Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: meson: Constify some structure

[Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>]

On Wed 07 Aug 2024 at 17:08, Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:

> Le 07/08/2024 à 16:14, Jerome Brunet a écrit :
>> On Wed 07 Aug 2024 at 11:30, Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>> 
>>> These 3 patches constify some structures in order to move some data to a
>>> read-only section, so increase overall security.
>>>
>>> It is splitted in 3 to ease review.
>> I'm not entirely sure it eases review in this case.
>> If a v2 is necessary, I think a single patch would be better.
>> 
>>> Patch 1: struct meson_pmx_group and meson_pmx_func
>>> patch 2: struct meson_bank
>>> patch 3: struct meson_pmx_bank
>> Is there any reason for leaving out 'struct meson_pinctrl_data' and
>> 'struct meson_axg_pmx_data' ? I don't think they get modified but maybe
>> I missed it.
>
> No good reasons.
>
> I'll send a v2 with everything constified all at once.
>
> Should I take the R-b and T-b below, for the v2?
>

Leave them out. I'll test again and report.
Thanks for this

>
> Thanks for the review and comment.
>
> CJ
>
>> 
>>>
>>> All patches are only compile tested.
>> Looks good anyway
>> Reviewed-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
>> On the vim3l:
>> Tested-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
>> 

-- 
Jerome

_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic