[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.20 027/117] clk: meson: meson8b: add support for more M/N values in sys_pll

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.20 027/117] clk: meson: meson8b: add support for more M/N values in sys_pll

[Sasha Levin]

From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>

[ Upstream commit e36c7e9898f2ba34becf37bda37b70e984b0bf4e ]

The sys_pll on the EC-100 board is configured to 1584MHz at boot
(either by u-boot, firmware or chip defaults). This is achieved by using
M = 66, N = 1 (24MHz * 66 / 1).
At boot the CPU clock is running off sys_pll divided by 2 which results
in 792MHz. Thus M = 66 is considered to be a "safe" value for Meson8b.

To achieve 1608MHz (one of the CPU OPPs on Meson8 and Meson8m2) we need
M = 67, N = 1. I ran "stress --cpu 4" while infinitely cycling through
all available frequencies on my Meson8m2 board and could not spot any
issues with this setting (after ~12 hours of running this).

On Meson8, Meson8b and Meson8m2 we also want to be able to use 408MHz
and 816MHz CPU frequencies. These can be achieved by dividing sys_pll by
4 (for 408MHz) or 2 (for 816MHz). That means that sys_pll has to run at
1632MHz which can be generated using M = 68, N = 1.
Similarily we also want to be able to use 1008MHz as CPU frequency. This
means that sys_pll has to run either at 1008MHz or 2016MHz. The former
would result in an M value of 42, which is lower than the smallest value
used by the 3.10 GPL kernel sources from Amlogic (50 is the lower limit
there). Thus we need to run sys_pll at 2016MHz which can ge generated
using M = 84, N = 1.
I tested M = 68 and M = 84 on my Meson8b Odroid-C1 and my Meson8m2 board
by running "stress --cpu 4" while infinitely cycling thorugh all
available frequencies. I could not spot any issues after ~12 hours of
running this.

Amlogic's 3.10 GPL kernel sources have more M/N combinations. I did not
add them yet because M = 74 (to achieve close to 1800MHz on Meson8) and
M = 82 (to achieve close to 1992MHz on Meson8 as well) caused my
Meson8m2 board to hang randomly. It's not clear why this is (for example
because the board's voltage regulator design is bad, some missing bits
for these values in our clk-pll driver, etc.). Thus the following M
values from the Amlogic 3.10 GPL kernel sources are skipped as of now:
69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, 86, 88, 90, 92, 94, 96, 98

Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181115224048.13511-5-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/clk/meson/meson8b.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/meson/meson8b.c b/drivers/clk/meson/meson8b.c
index 346b9e165b7a..a059db63907c 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/meson/meson8b.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/meson/meson8b.c
@@ -42,6 +42,11 @@ static const struct pll_params_table sys_pll_params_table[] = {
 	PLL_PARAMS(62, 1),
 	PLL_PARAMS(63, 1),
 	PLL_PARAMS(64, 1),
+	PLL_PARAMS(65, 1),
+	PLL_PARAMS(66, 1),
+	PLL_PARAMS(67, 1),
+	PLL_PARAMS(68, 1),
+	PLL_PARAMS(84, 1),
 	{ /* sentinel */ },
 };
 
-- 
2.19.1


_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.20 028/117] clk: meson: meson8b: fix incorrect divider mapping in cpu_scale_table

[Sasha Levin]

From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>

[ Upstream commit ad9b2b8e53af61375322e3c7d624acf3a3ef53b0 ]

The public S805 datasheet only mentions that
HHI_SYS_CPU_CLK_CNTL1[20:29] contains a divider called "cpu_scale_div".
Unfortunately it does not mention how to use the register contents.

The Amlogic 3.10 GPL kernel sources are using the following code to
calculate the CPU clock based on that register (taken from
arch/arm/mach-meson8/clock.c in the 3.10 Amlogic kernel, shortened to
make it easier to read):
N = (aml_read_reg32(P_HHI_SYS_CPU_CLK_CNTL1) >> 20) & 0x3FF;
if (sel == 3) /* use cpu_scale_div */
  div = 2 * N;
else
  div = ... /* not relevant for this example */
cpu_clk = parent_clk / div;

This suggests that the formula is: parent_rate / 2 * register_value
However, running perf (which can measure the CPU clock rate thanks to
the ARM PMU) shows that this formula is not correct.
This can be reproduced with the following steps:
1. boot into u-boot
2. let the CPU clock run off the XTAL clock:
   mw.l 0xC110419C 0x30 1
3. set the cpu_scale_div register:
   to value 0x1: mw.l 0xC110415C 0x801016A2 1
   to value 0x2: mw.l 0xC110415C 0x802016A2 1
   to value 0x5: mw.l 0xC110415C 0x805016A2 1
4. let the CPU clock run off cpu_scale_div:
   mw.l 0xC110419C 0xbd 1
5. boot Linux
6. run: perf stat -aB stress --cpu 4 --timeout 10
7. check the "cycles" value

I get the following results depending on the cpu_scale_div value:
- (cpu_in_sel - this is the input clock for cpu_scale_div - runs at
   1.2GHz)
- 0x1 = 300MHz
- 0x2 = 200MHz
- 0x5 = 100MHz

This means that the actual formula to calculate the output of the
cpu_scale_div clock is: parent_rate / 2 * (register value + 1).

The register value 0x0 is reserved. When letting the CPU clock run off
the cpu_scale_div while the value is 0x0 the whole board hangs (even in
u-boot).

I also verified this with the TWD timer: when adding this to the .dts
without specifying it's clock it will auto-detect the PERIPH (which is
the input clock of the TWD) clock rate (and the result is shown in the
kernel log). On Meson8, Meson8b and Meson8m2 the PERIPH clock is CPUCLK
divided by 4. This also matched for all three test-cases from above (in
all cases the TWD timer clock rate was approx. one fourth of the CPU
clock rate).

A small note regarding the "fixes" tag: the original issue seems to
exist virtually since forever. Even commit 28b9fcd016126e ("clk:
meson8b: Add support for Meson8b clocks") seems to handle this wrong. I
still decided to use commit 251b6fd38bcb9c ("clk: meson: rework meson8b
cpu clock") because this is the first commit which gets the CPU hiearchy
correct and thus it's the first commit where the cpu_scale_div register
is used correctly (apart from the bug in the cpu_scale_table).

Fixes: 251b6fd38bcb9c ("clk: meson: rework meson8b cpu clock")
Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180927085921.24627-2-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/clk/meson/meson8b.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/meson/meson8b.c b/drivers/clk/meson/meson8b.c
index a059db63907c..1d39273d7a04 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/meson/meson8b.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/meson/meson8b.c
@@ -584,13 +584,14 @@ static struct clk_fixed_factor meson8b_cpu_div3 = {
 };
 
 static const struct clk_div_table cpu_scale_table[] = {
-	{ .val = 2, .div = 4 },
-	{ .val = 3, .div = 6 },
-	{ .val = 4, .div = 8 },
-	{ .val = 5, .div = 10 },
-	{ .val = 6, .div = 12 },
-	{ .val = 7, .div = 14 },
-	{ .val = 8, .div = 16 },
+	{ .val = 1, .div = 4 },
+	{ .val = 2, .div = 6 },
+	{ .val = 3, .div = 8 },
+	{ .val = 4, .div = 10 },
+	{ .val = 5, .div = 12 },
+	{ .val = 6, .div = 14 },
+	{ .val = 7, .div = 16 },
+	{ .val = 8, .div = 18 },
 	{ /* sentinel */ },
 };
 
-- 
2.19.1


_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic