From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jian Hu" <jian.hu@amlogic.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
robh@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] clk: meson: t7: Model PLL pre-divider as a divider clock
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 11:26:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260923112659.8A02B1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260923-meson_refactor_n-v1-3-3a8ce27121a2@amlogic.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] clk: meson: t7: PLL pre-dividers permanently stuck at 0 due to missing CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT
- [Low] clk: meson: build failure in drivers after struct meson_clk_pll_data change
--
commit 03f0a62ef49427b4fecb0de15b51e80cb45be623
Author: Jian Hu <jian.hu@amlogic.com>
clk: meson: t7: Model PLL pre-divider as a divider clock
This commit replaces the dedicated PLL pre-divider with a standalone
divider clock in the Meson T7 clock driver. The PLL DCO clocks are
updated to take the new pre-divider clock as their parent instead of
the input clock directly.
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/meson/t7-pll.c b/drivers/clk/meson/t7-pll.c
> index 0a622f45fa368..049f0c879c458 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/meson/t7-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/meson/t7-pll.c
> @@ -71,6 +71,34 @@
> #define MCLK_PLL_CNTL4 0x10
> #define MCLK_PLL_STS 0x14
>
> +static const struct clk_div_table t7_prediv_div_table[] = {
> + { .val = 1, .div = 1 },
> + { /* sentinel */ }
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_regmap t7_gp0_prediv = {
> + .data = &(struct clk_regmap_div_data){
> + .offset = GP0PLL_CTRL0,
> + .shift = 10,
> + .width = 5,
> + .table = t7_prediv_div_table,
> + /*
> + * The hardware reset value is 0. Allow it during clock registration
> + * to avoid a warning from the common divider code.
> + * set_rate() will program the valid divider value (1).
> + */
> + .flags = CLK_DIVIDER_ALLOW_ZERO,
[ ... ]
> @@ -97,11 +125,6 @@ static struct clk_regmap t7_gp0_pll_dco = {
> .shift = 0,
> .width = 8,
> },
> - .n = {
> - .reg_off = GP0PLL_CTRL0,
> - .shift = 10,
> - .width = 5,
> - },
[Severity: Low]
When removing the .n parameter initialization here (and presumably from
struct meson_clk_pll_data in a prerequisite commit), does this patch series
also update other Meson drivers like drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.c and
drivers/clk/meson/axg.c?
Looking at other drivers in the tree, they appear to still statically
initialize .n in their declarations:
drivers/clk/meson/gxbb.c:gxbb_fixed_pll_dco() {
...
.n = {
.reg_off = HHI_MPLL_CNTL,
.shift = 9,
.width = 5,
},
...
}
Will leaving these initializations in place cause a build failure with a
'has no member' error for those drivers?
> .l = {
> .reg_off = GP0PLL_STS,
> .shift = 31,
> @@ -119,8 +142,8 @@ static struct clk_regmap t7_gp0_pll_dco = {
> .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> .name = "gp0_pll_dco",
> .ops = &meson_clk_pll_ops,
> - .parent_data = &(const struct clk_parent_data) {
> - .fw_name = "in0",
> + .parent_hws = (const struct clk_hw *[]) {
> + &t7_gp0_prediv.hw
> },
> .num_parents = 1,
> },
[Severity: High]
Since the pre-divider relies on .set_rate() to correct the invalid
hardware reset value of 0, will the common clock framework ever actually
call .set_rate() on the pre-divider?
Without adding the CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag here on the DCO clock
(t7_gp0_pll_dco), rate requests to the DCO won't propagate up to the
pre-divider. Could this leave the pre-divider stuck at the invalid 0 state
and permanently prevent the PLL from functioning?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260923-meson_refactor_n-v1-0-3a8ce27121a2@amlogic.com?part=3
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-23 11:14 [PATCH RFC 0/3] clk: meson: Refactor " Jian Hu via B4 Relay
2026-09-23 11:14 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] clk: meson: pll: Remove the dedicated n parameter Jian Hu via B4 Relay
2026-09-23 11:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 11:14 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] dt-bindings: clock: amlogic: Add T7 pre-divider clock IDs Jian Hu via B4 Relay
2026-09-23 11:14 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] clk: meson: t7: Model PLL pre-divider as a divider clock Jian Hu via B4 Relay
2026-09-23 11:26 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260923112659.8A02B1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jian.hu@amlogic.com \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®