From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
To: "Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"Jerome Brunet" <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
"Martin Blumenstingl" <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
"Neil Armstrong" <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@baylibre.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"thierry.reding@gmail.com" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Amlogic Meson..."
<linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] pwm: meson: make full use of common clock framework
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 09:23:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ca531c1a-3c62-5fb1-6765-68ec1e541483@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cb79d313-c7a2-42e9-639a-63cb5366521a@gmail.com>
On 13/04/2023 07:54, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Newer versions of the PWM block use a core clock with external mux,
> divider, and gate. These components either don't exist any longer in
> the PWM block, or they are bypassed.
> To minimize needed changes for supporting the new version, the internal
> divider and gate should be handled by CCF too.
>
> I didn't see a good way to split the patch, therefore it's somewhat
> bigger. What it does:
>
> - The internal mux is handled by CCF already. Register also internal
> divider and gate with CCF, so that we have one representation of the
> input clock: [mux] parent of [divider] parent of [gate]
>
> - Now that CCF selects an appropriate mux parent, we don't need the
> DT-provided default parent any longer. Accordingly we can also omit
> setting the mux parent directly in the driver.
>
> - Instead of manually handling the pre-div divider value, let CCF
> set the input clock. Targeted input clock frequency is
> 0xffff * 1/period for best precision.
>
> - For the "inverted pwm disabled" scenario target an input clock
> frequency of 1GHz. This ensures that the remaining low pulses
> have minimum length.
>
> I don't have hw with the old PWM block, therefore I couldn't test this
> patch. With the not yet included extension for the new PWM block
> (channel->clk coming directly from get_clk(external_clk)) I didn't
> notice any problem. My system uses PWM for the CPU voltage regulator
> and for the SDIO 32kHz clock.
>
> Note: The clock gate in the old PWM block is permanently disabled.
> This seems to indicate that it's not used by the new PWM block.
>
> Tested-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes to RFT/RFC version:
> - use parent_hws instead of parent_names for div/gate clock
> - use devm_clk_hw_register where the struct clk * returned by
> devm_clk_register isn't needed
>
> v2:
> - add patch 1
> - add patch 3
> - switch to using clk_parent_data in all relevant places
> v3:
> - add flag CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED
> v4:
> - remove variable tmp in meson_pwm_get_state
> - don't use deprecated function devm_clk_register
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c | 142 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
> index 40a8709ff..80ac71cbc 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
> #define REG_MISC_AB 0x8
> #define MISC_B_CLK_EN 23
> #define MISC_A_CLK_EN 15
> -#define MISC_CLK_DIV_MASK 0x7f
> +#define MISC_CLK_DIV_WIDTH 7
> #define MISC_B_CLK_DIV_SHIFT 16
> #define MISC_A_CLK_DIV_SHIFT 8
> #define MISC_B_CLK_SEL_SHIFT 6
> @@ -87,12 +87,13 @@ static struct meson_pwm_channel_data {
> };
>
> struct meson_pwm_channel {
> + unsigned long rate;
> unsigned int hi;
> unsigned int lo;
> - u8 pre_div;
>
> - struct clk *clk_parent;
> struct clk_mux mux;
> + struct clk_divider div;
> + struct clk_gate gate;
> struct clk *clk;
> };
>
> @@ -125,16 +126,6 @@ static int meson_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> struct device *dev = chip->dev;
> int err;
>
> - if (channel->clk_parent) {
> - err = clk_set_parent(channel->clk, channel->clk_parent);
> - if (err < 0) {
> - dev_err(dev, "failed to set parent %s for %s: %d\n",
> - __clk_get_name(channel->clk_parent),
> - __clk_get_name(channel->clk), err);
> - return err;
> - }
> - }
> -
> err = clk_prepare_enable(channel->clk);
> if (err < 0) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed to enable clock %s: %d\n",
> @@ -157,8 +148,9 @@ static int meson_pwm_calc(struct meson_pwm *meson, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> const struct pwm_state *state)
> {
> struct meson_pwm_channel *channel = &meson->channels[pwm->hwpwm];
> - unsigned int duty, period, pre_div, cnt, duty_cnt;
> + unsigned int duty, period, cnt, duty_cnt;
> unsigned long fin_freq;
> + u64 freq;
>
> duty = state->duty_cycle;
> period = state->period;
> @@ -166,7 +158,11 @@ static int meson_pwm_calc(struct meson_pwm *meson, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> if (state->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
> duty = period - duty;
>
> - fin_freq = clk_get_rate(channel->clk);
> + freq = div64_u64(NSEC_PER_SEC * (u64)0xffff, period);
> + if (freq > ULONG_MAX)
> + freq = ULONG_MAX;
> +
> + fin_freq = clk_round_rate(channel->clk, freq);
> if (fin_freq == 0) {
> dev_err(meson->chip.dev, "invalid source clock frequency\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -174,46 +170,35 @@ static int meson_pwm_calc(struct meson_pwm *meson, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>
> dev_dbg(meson->chip.dev, "fin_freq: %lu Hz\n", fin_freq);
>
> - pre_div = div64_u64(fin_freq * (u64)period, NSEC_PER_SEC * 0xffffLL);
> - if (pre_div > MISC_CLK_DIV_MASK) {
> - dev_err(meson->chip.dev, "unable to get period pre_div\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> - cnt = div64_u64(fin_freq * (u64)period, NSEC_PER_SEC * (pre_div + 1));
> + cnt = div64_u64(fin_freq * (u64)period, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> if (cnt > 0xffff) {
> dev_err(meson->chip.dev, "unable to get period cnt\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - dev_dbg(meson->chip.dev, "period=%u pre_div=%u cnt=%u\n", period,
> - pre_div, cnt);
> + dev_dbg(meson->chip.dev, "period=%u cnt=%u\n", period, cnt);
>
> if (duty == period) {
> - channel->pre_div = pre_div;
> channel->hi = cnt;
> channel->lo = 0;
> } else if (duty == 0) {
> - channel->pre_div = pre_div;
> channel->hi = 0;
> channel->lo = cnt;
> } else {
> - /* Then check is we can have the duty with the same pre_div */
> - duty_cnt = div64_u64(fin_freq * (u64)duty,
> - NSEC_PER_SEC * (pre_div + 1));
> + duty_cnt = div64_u64(fin_freq * (u64)duty, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> if (duty_cnt > 0xffff) {
> dev_err(meson->chip.dev, "unable to get duty cycle\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - dev_dbg(meson->chip.dev, "duty=%u pre_div=%u duty_cnt=%u\n",
> - duty, pre_div, duty_cnt);
> + dev_dbg(meson->chip.dev, "duty=%u duty_cnt=%u\n", duty, duty_cnt);
>
> - channel->pre_div = pre_div;
> channel->hi = duty_cnt;
> channel->lo = cnt - duty_cnt;
> }
>
> + channel->rate = fin_freq;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -223,16 +208,15 @@ static void meson_pwm_enable(struct meson_pwm *meson, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> struct meson_pwm_channel_data *channel_data;
> unsigned long flags;
> u32 value;
> + int err;
>
> channel_data = &meson_pwm_per_channel_data[pwm->hwpwm];
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&meson->lock, flags);
> + err = clk_set_rate(channel->clk, channel->rate);
> + if (err)
> + dev_err(meson->chip.dev, "setting clock rate failed\n");
>
> - value = readl(meson->base + REG_MISC_AB);
> - value &= ~(MISC_CLK_DIV_MASK << channel_data->clk_div_shift);
> - value |= channel->pre_div << channel_data->clk_div_shift;
> - value |= BIT(channel_data->clk_en_bit);
> - writel(value, meson->base + REG_MISC_AB);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&meson->lock, flags);
>
> value = FIELD_PREP(PWM_HIGH_MASK, channel->hi) |
> FIELD_PREP(PWM_LOW_MASK, channel->lo);
> @@ -271,16 +255,16 @@ static int meson_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> /*
> * This IP block revision doesn't have an "always high"
> * setting which we can use for "inverted disabled".
> - * Instead we achieve this using the same settings
> - * that we use a pre_div of 0 (to get the shortest
> - * possible duration for one "count") and
> + * Instead we achieve this by setting an arbitrary,
> + * very high frequency, resulting in the shortest
> + * possible duration for one "count" and
> * "period == duty_cycle". This results in a signal
> * which is LOW for one "count", while being HIGH for
> * the rest of the (so the signal is HIGH for slightly
> * less than 100% of the period, but this is the best
> * we can achieve).
> */
> - channel->pre_div = 0;
> + channel->rate = 1000000000;
> channel->hi = ~0;
> channel->lo = 0;
This looks like a really bad idea... please don't do that and instead introduce
some pinctrl states where we set the PWM pin as GPIO mode high/low state like we
did for SPI:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221004-up-aml-fix-spi-v4-2-0342d8e10c49@baylibre.com
>
> @@ -305,7 +289,6 @@ static unsigned int meson_pwm_cnt_to_ns(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> struct meson_pwm *meson = to_meson_pwm(chip);
> struct meson_pwm_channel *channel;
> unsigned long fin_freq;
> - u32 fin_ns;
>
> /* to_meson_pwm() can only be used after .get_state() is called */
> channel = &meson->channels[pwm->hwpwm];
> @@ -314,9 +297,7 @@ static unsigned int meson_pwm_cnt_to_ns(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> if (fin_freq == 0)
> return 0;
>
> - fin_ns = div_u64(NSEC_PER_SEC, fin_freq);
> -
> - return cnt * fin_ns * (channel->pre_div + 1);
> + return div_u64(NSEC_PER_SEC * (u64)cnt, fin_freq);
> }
>
> static int meson_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> @@ -325,7 +306,7 @@ static int meson_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> struct meson_pwm *meson = to_meson_pwm(chip);
> struct meson_pwm_channel_data *channel_data;
> struct meson_pwm_channel *channel;
> - u32 value, tmp;
> + u32 value;
>
> if (!state)
> return 0;
> @@ -335,11 +316,8 @@ static int meson_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>
> value = readl(meson->base + REG_MISC_AB);
>
> - tmp = BIT(channel_data->pwm_en_bit) | BIT(channel_data->clk_en_bit);
> - state->enabled = (value & tmp) == tmp;
> -
> - tmp = value >> channel_data->clk_div_shift;
> - channel->pre_div = FIELD_GET(MISC_CLK_DIV_MASK, tmp);
> + state->enabled = __clk_is_enabled(channel->clk) &&
> + value & BIT(channel_data->pwm_en_bit);
>
> value = readl(meson->base + channel_data->reg_offset);
>
> @@ -480,6 +458,7 @@ static int meson_pwm_init_channels(struct meson_pwm *meson)
>
> for (i = 0; i < meson->chip.npwm; i++) {
> struct meson_pwm_channel *channel = &meson->channels[i];
> + struct clk_parent_data div_parent = {}, gate_parent = {};
> struct clk_init_data init = {};
>
> snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s#mux%u", dev_name(dev), i);
> @@ -499,18 +478,63 @@ static int meson_pwm_init_channels(struct meson_pwm *meson)
> channel->mux.table = NULL;
> channel->mux.hw.init = &init;
>
> - channel->clk = devm_clk_register(dev, &channel->mux.hw);
> - if (IS_ERR(channel->clk)) {
> - err = PTR_ERR(channel->clk);
> + err = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &channel->mux.hw);
> + if (err) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed to register %s: %d\n", name, err);
> return err;
> }
>
> - snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "clkin%u", i);
> + snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s#div%u", dev_name(dev), i);
> +
> + init.name = name;
> + init.ops = &clk_divider_ops;
> + init.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT;
> + div_parent.index = -1;
> + div_parent.hw = &channel->mux.hw;
> + init.parent_data = &div_parent;
> + init.num_parents = 1;
> +
> + channel->div.reg = meson->base + REG_MISC_AB;
> + channel->div.shift = meson_pwm_per_channel_data[i].clk_div_shift;
> + channel->div.width = MISC_CLK_DIV_WIDTH;
> + channel->div.hw.init = &init;
> + channel->div.flags = 0;
> + channel->div.lock = &meson->lock;
> +
> + err = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &channel->div.hw);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to register %s: %d\n", name, err);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s#gate%u", dev_name(dev), i);
> +
> + init.name = name;
> + init.ops = &clk_gate_ops;
> + init.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED;
> + gate_parent.index = -1;
> + gate_parent.hw = &channel->div.hw;
> + init.parent_data = &gate_parent;
> + init.num_parents = 1;
> +
> + channel->gate.reg = meson->base + REG_MISC_AB;
> + channel->gate.bit_idx = meson_pwm_per_channel_data[i].clk_en_bit;
> + channel->gate.hw.init = &init;
> + channel->gate.flags = 0;
> + channel->gate.lock = &meson->lock;
> +
> + err = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &channel->gate.hw);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to register %s: %d\n", name, err);
> + return err;
> + }
>
> - channel->clk_parent = devm_clk_get_optional(dev, name);
> - if (IS_ERR(channel->clk_parent))
> - return PTR_ERR(channel->clk_parent);
> + channel->clk = devm_clk_hw_get_clk(dev, &channel->gate.hw, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(channel->clk)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(channel->clk);
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to register %s: %d\n", name, err);
> + return err;
> + }
> }
>
> return 0;
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-17 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-13 5:48 [PATCH v4 0/4] " Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-13 5:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] pwm: meson: switch to using struct clk_parent_data for mux parents Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-13 5:50 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] pwm: meson: don't use hdmi/video clock as mux parent Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-13 5:51 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] pwm: meson: change clk/pwm gate from mask to bit Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-13 5:54 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] pwm: meson: make full use of common clock framework Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-14 19:39 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2023-04-15 6:39 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-16 19:26 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2023-04-16 21:34 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-23 20:55 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2023-04-17 7:23 ` Neil Armstrong [this message]
2023-04-17 9:17 ` Thierry Reding
2023-04-17 9:53 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-17 9:59 ` neil.armstrong
2023-04-17 10:36 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-17 12:21 ` neil.armstrong
2023-04-19 19:58 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-21 7:39 ` neil.armstrong
2023-04-23 20:58 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2023-05-01 13:39 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-05-19 15:30 ` Dmitry Rokosov
2023-05-19 16:53 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-05-22 13:37 ` Dmitry Rokosov
2023-05-22 20:10 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-05-23 10:28 ` Dmitry Rokosov
2023-05-23 19:22 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-04-17 7:19 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] " Neil Armstrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ca531c1a-3c62-5fb1-6765-68ec1e541483@linaro.org \
--to=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®