mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Modules Debate
@ 2003-02-20 17:53 Matthew D. Pitts
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Matthew D. Pitts @ 2003-02-20 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

Fellow kernel hackers,

I think that we have missed the point that Rusty has been trying to make.
The existing modutils have to support multiple interfaces and as he has said
in the past, some of those interfaces are difficult, if not impossible to
use as the authors intended. He is trying to get all coders on the same page
with his new module interface, and it is normal that some are upset with his
decision to change things. But Linus seems to understand where Rusty is
trying to take the development effort and has chosen to go with Rusty's
ideas. Those that don't want to change are free, as always, to make their
code available to those that wish to use it. Rusty, correct me if I'm wrong,
but wasn't the gist of what you said at the Kernel Summit last summer that
we should build in as much as we knew we needed to support our hardware and
use modules for stuff we weren't going to use as often?

Matthew D. Pitts


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-02-20 17:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-02-20 17:53 Modules Debate Matthew D. Pitts

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®