* Re: pte_offset and pte_offset_map
2003-10-05 14:42 pte_offset and pte_offset_map Breno
@ 2003-09-04 16:01 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2003-09-04 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Breno; +Cc: linux-kernel
"Breno" <brenosp@brasilsec.com.br> wrote:
>
> pte_offset() in 2.4 is the same as pte_offset_map in 2.6 ?
Yes.
> What´s PageCompound bit flag ?
It indicates that the page is part of a "higher order" allocation: It was
obtained via a 2, 4, 8... page allocation.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* pte_offset and pte_offset_map
@ 2003-10-05 14:42 Breno
2003-09-04 16:01 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Breno @ 2003-10-05 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kernel List
pte_offset() in 2.4 is the same as pte_offset_map in 2.6 ?
What´s PageCompound bit flag ?
Breno
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-04 16:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-05 14:42 pte_offset and pte_offset_map Breno
2003-09-04 16:01 ` Andrew Morton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®