From: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
To: "'Thierry Reding'" <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "'Jingoo Han'" <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: samsung: fix the number of PWMs
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 08:17:59 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001001cd7105$0e465d40$2ad317c0$%han@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120802095354.GA18945@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de>
On Thursday, August 02, 2012 6:54 PM Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 05:56:27PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > Samsung SoC can provide 4 PWMs; thus, the number of PWMs should be
> > set as 4.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
> > index e5187c0..32562c6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
> > @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static int s3c_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > s3c->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
> > s3c->chip.ops = &s3c_pwm_ops;
> > s3c->chip.base = -1;
> > - s3c->chip.npwm = 1;
> > + s3c->chip.npwm = 4;
>
> I don't think this is correct. The driver seems to be using the platform
> device id as index currently, which indicates that the driver is bound
> against 4 different platform devices, each representing a single PWM. If
> you want to service multiple PWM devices by a single instance you need
> to make further changes to the driver. For instance the tcon_base is
> initialized based on the platform id. This could easily be replaced by
> making it depend on the .hwpwm member of pwm_device.
I just want to use pwm backlight on Samsung SoC boards.
After moving samusng pwm driver from 'arch/arm/plat-samsung/'
to 'drivers/pwm/', pwm bakclight does not work properly.
When pwm_id is '1' and PWM backlight calls pwm_request(data->pwm_id,
"pwm-backlight"), pwm_to_device() returns NULL.
Then, do you mean that?
s3c->chip.npwm = id + 1;
>
> You may also want to consider making the driver a proper module if that
> works on the platforms that need it. I see that it is currently an
> arch_initcall, but it might be cleaner to use deferred driver probe
> instead.
Sorry, I cannot understand what you say.
>
> Thierry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-02 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-02 8:56 Jingoo Han
2012-08-02 9:53 ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-02 23:17 ` Jingoo Han [this message]
2012-08-03 5:03 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001001cd7105$0e465d40$2ad317c0$%han@samsung.com' \
--to=jg1.han@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@avionic-design.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®