From: "erich" <erich@areca.com.tw>
To: "Jens Axboe" <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: <dax@gurulabs.com>, <billion.wu@areca.com.tw>,
"\"Al Viro\"" <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
"\"Andrew Morton\"" <akpm@osdl.org>,
"\"Randy.Dunlap\"" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
"\"Matti Aarnio\"" <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"\"James Bottomley\"" <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>,
"\"Chris Caputo\"" <ccaputo@alt.net>
Subject: Re: new Areca driver in 2.6.16-rc6-mm2 appears to be broken
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:11:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001e01c66451$f9a470f0$b100a8c0@erich2003> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060420064249.GO614@suse.de>
Dear Dear Jens Axboe,
Thanks for your notification and advice.
Areca's firmware has max sg entries of 38 limit.
In my debug driver I had add this condition check.
But no one request more than 38 sg.
Both transfer length all have a lot of requests equal with 38 sg.
But why it ocur only at 4096 sectors?
If the /sys/block/sda/queue/max_sectors_kb equal 256 all operation running
well.
But if I modify it more than 256, the bug appeared.
I will do more research about why there were a lot of requests equal with
38 sg in all file system.
And only it ocur at the volume that format with mkfs.ext2.
Thanks again.
Best Regards
Erich Chen
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jens Axboe" <axboe@suse.de>
To: "erich" <erich@areca.com.tw>
Cc: <dax@gurulabs.com>; <billion.wu@areca.com.tw>; "Al Viro"
<viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>; "Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>; "Randy.Dunlap"
<rdunlap@xenotime.net>; "Matti Aarnio" <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org>;
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; "James Bottomley"
<James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>; "Chris Caputo" <ccaputo@alt.net>
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: new Areca driver in 2.6.16-rc6-mm2 appears to be broken
> On Thu, Apr 20 2006, erich wrote:
>> Dear Jens Axboe,
>>
>> I do "fsck -fy /dev/sda1" on driver MAX_XFER_SECTORS 512.
>> The file system was not clean.
>> I attach mesg.txt for you refer to.
>>
>> =====================================
>> == boot with driver MAX_XFER_SECTORS 4096
>> =====================================
>> #mkfs.ext2 /dev/sda1
>> #reboot
>> =====================================
>> == boot with driver MAX_XFER_SECTORS 512
>> =====================================
>> #fsck -fy /dev/sda1
>> /dev/sda1:clean,.............
>> #reboot
>> =====================================
>> == boot with driver MAX_XFER_SECTORS 4096
>> =====================================
>> #mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/sda1
>> #cp /root/aa /mnt/sda1
>> #reboot
>> =====================================
>> == boot with driver MAX_XFER_SECTORS 512
>> =====================================
>> #fsck -fy /dev/sda1
>> /dev/sda1: no clean,........and dump message such as the attach file
>> mesg.txt.
>
> So the conclusion is that your driver and/or hardware corrupts data when
> you set MAX_XFER_SECTORS too high. I can't help you anymore with this,
> you should be in the best position to debug the driver and/or hardware
> :-)
>
> It could be that the higher setting just exposes another transfer
> setting bug, like maximum number of segments or segment size, etc.
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-20 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603212310070.20655@nacho.alt.net>
2006-03-30 8:54 ` erich
2006-03-30 15:46 ` Chris Caputo
[not found] ` <004a01c65470$412daaa0$b100a8c0@erich2003>
[not found] ` <20060330192057.4bd8c568.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <20060331074237.GH14022@suse.de>
2006-03-31 8:36 ` erich
2006-04-12 13:20 ` erich
2006-04-19 10:40 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-19 13:16 ` erich
2006-04-19 13:19 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20 1:54 ` erich
2006-04-20 6:42 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20 8:11 ` erich [this message]
2006-04-20 8:23 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20 9:32 ` erich
2006-04-20 9:39 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20 12:53 ` James Bottomley
2006-04-20 15:38 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-04-25 8:45 ` erich
2006-04-25 16:02 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-04-26 3:24 ` erich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001e01c66451$f9a470f0$b100a8c0@erich2003' \
--to=erich@areca.com.tw \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=billion.wu@areca.com.tw \
--cc=ccaputo@alt.net \
--cc=dax@gurulabs.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matti.aarnio@zmailer.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome