mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "erich" <erich@areca.com.tw>
To: "Jens Axboe" <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: <dax@gurulabs.com>, <billion.wu@areca.com.tw>,
	"\"Al Viro\"" <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
	"\"Andrew Morton\"" <akpm@osdl.org>,
	"\"Randy.Dunlap\"" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
	"\"Matti Aarnio\"" <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"\"James Bottomley\"" <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>,
	"\"Chris Caputo\"" <ccaputo@alt.net>
Subject: Re: new Areca driver in 2.6.16-rc6-mm2 appears to be broken
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:11:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <001e01c66451$f9a470f0$b100a8c0@erich2003> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060420064249.GO614@suse.de>

Dear Dear Jens Axboe,

Thanks for your notification and advice.
Areca's firmware has max sg entries of 38 limit.
In my debug driver I had add this condition check.
But no one request more than 38 sg.
Both transfer length all have a lot of requests equal with 38 sg.
But why it ocur only at 4096 sectors?
If the /sys/block/sda/queue/max_sectors_kb equal 256 all operation running 
well.
But if I modify it more than 256, the bug appeared.
I  will do more research about why there were a lot of requests equal with 
38 sg in all file system.
And only it ocur at the volume that format with mkfs.ext2.
Thanks again.

Best Regards
Erich Chen

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jens Axboe" <axboe@suse.de>
To: "erich" <erich@areca.com.tw>
Cc: <dax@gurulabs.com>; <billion.wu@areca.com.tw>; "Al Viro" 
<viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>; "Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>; "Randy.Dunlap" 
<rdunlap@xenotime.net>; "Matti Aarnio" <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org>; 
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; "James Bottomley" 
<James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>; "Chris Caputo" <ccaputo@alt.net>
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: new Areca driver in 2.6.16-rc6-mm2 appears to be broken


> On Thu, Apr 20 2006, erich wrote:
>> Dear Jens Axboe,
>>
>> I  do "fsck -fy /dev/sda1" on driver MAX_XFER_SECTORS 512.
>> The file system was not clean.
>> I attach mesg.txt for you refer to.
>>
>> =====================================
>> == boot with driver MAX_XFER_SECTORS 4096
>> =====================================
>> #mkfs.ext2 /dev/sda1
>> #reboot
>> =====================================
>> == boot with driver MAX_XFER_SECTORS 512
>> =====================================
>> #fsck -fy /dev/sda1
>> /dev/sda1:clean,.............
>> #reboot
>> =====================================
>> == boot with driver MAX_XFER_SECTORS 4096
>> =====================================
>> #mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/sda1
>> #cp /root/aa /mnt/sda1
>> #reboot
>> =====================================
>> == boot with driver MAX_XFER_SECTORS 512
>> =====================================
>> #fsck -fy /dev/sda1
>> /dev/sda1: no clean,........and dump message such as the attach file
>> mesg.txt.
>
> So the conclusion is that your driver and/or hardware corrupts data when
> you set MAX_XFER_SECTORS too high. I can't help you anymore with this,
> you should be in the best position to debug the driver and/or hardware
> :-)
>
> It could be that the higher setting just exposes another transfer
> setting bug, like maximum number of segments or segment size, etc.
>
> -- 
> Jens Axboe
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2006-04-20  8:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603212310070.20655@nacho.alt.net>
2006-03-30  8:54 ` erich
2006-03-30 15:46   ` Chris Caputo
     [not found]     ` <004a01c65470$412daaa0$b100a8c0@erich2003>
     [not found]       ` <20060330192057.4bd8c568.akpm@osdl.org>
     [not found]         ` <20060331074237.GH14022@suse.de>
2006-03-31  8:36           ` erich
2006-04-12 13:20           ` erich
2006-04-19 10:40             ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-19 13:16               ` erich
2006-04-19 13:19                 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20  1:54                   ` erich
2006-04-20  6:42                     ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20  8:11                       ` erich [this message]
2006-04-20  8:23                         ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20  9:32                           ` erich
2006-04-20  9:39                             ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20 12:53                           ` James Bottomley
2006-04-20 15:38                         ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-04-25  8:45                           ` erich
2006-04-25 16:02                             ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-04-26  3:24                               ` erich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='001e01c66451$f9a470f0$b100a8c0@erich2003' \
    --to=erich@areca.com.tw \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=billion.wu@areca.com.tw \
    --cc=ccaputo@alt.net \
    --cc=dax@gurulabs.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matti.aarnio@zmailer.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome