mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
To: "erich" <erich@areca.com.tw>
Cc: axboe@suse.de, dax@gurulabs.com, billion.wu@areca.com.tw,
	viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, akpm@osdl.org, matti.aarnio@zmailer.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@steeleye.com,
	ccaputo@alt.net
Subject: Re: new Areca driver in 2.6.16-rc6-mm2 appears to be broken
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 08:38:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060420083812.d47a74bb.rdunlap@xenotime.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001e01c66451$f9a470f0$b100a8c0@erich2003>

On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:11:04 +0800 erich wrote:

> Dear Dear Jens Axboe,
> 
> Thanks for your notification and advice.
> Areca's firmware has max sg entries of 38 limit.
> In my debug driver I had add this condition check.
> But no one request more than 38 sg.

Yesterday I saw a request with 70 sg pieces.  It was while
running mkfs.ext3 .

> Both transfer length all have a lot of requests equal with 38 sg.
> But why it ocur only at 4096 sectors?
> If the /sys/block/sda/queue/max_sectors_kb equal 256 all operation running 
> well.
> But if I modify it more than 256, the bug appeared.
> I  will do more research about why there were a lot of requests equal with 
> 38 sg in all file system.
> And only it ocur at the volume that format with mkfs.ext2.
> Thanks again.
> 
> Best Regards
> Erich Chen
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jens Axboe" <axboe@suse.de>
> To: "erich" <erich@areca.com.tw>
> Cc: <dax@gurulabs.com>; <billion.wu@areca.com.tw>; "Al Viro" 
> <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>; "Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>; "Randy.Dunlap" 
> <rdunlap@xenotime.net>; "Matti Aarnio" <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org>; 
> <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; "James Bottomley" 
> <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>; "Chris Caputo" <ccaputo@alt.net>
> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 2:42 PM
> Subject: Re: new Areca driver in 2.6.16-rc6-mm2 appears to be broken
> 
> 
> > On Thu, Apr 20 2006, erich wrote:
> >> Dear Jens Axboe,
> >>
> >> I  do "fsck -fy /dev/sda1" on driver MAX_XFER_SECTORS 512.
> >> The file system was not clean.
> >> I attach mesg.txt for you refer to.
> >>
> >> =====================================
> >> == boot with driver MAX_XFER_SECTORS 4096
> >> =====================================
> >> #mkfs.ext2 /dev/sda1
> >> #reboot
> >> =====================================
> >> == boot with driver MAX_XFER_SECTORS 512
> >> =====================================
> >> #fsck -fy /dev/sda1
> >> /dev/sda1:clean,.............
> >> #reboot
> >> =====================================
> >> == boot with driver MAX_XFER_SECTORS 4096
> >> =====================================
> >> #mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/sda1
> >> #cp /root/aa /mnt/sda1
> >> #reboot
> >> =====================================
> >> == boot with driver MAX_XFER_SECTORS 512
> >> =====================================
> >> #fsck -fy /dev/sda1
> >> /dev/sda1: no clean,........and dump message such as the attach file
> >> mesg.txt.
> >
> > So the conclusion is that your driver and/or hardware corrupts data when
> > you set MAX_XFER_SECTORS too high. I can't help you anymore with this,
> > you should be in the best position to debug the driver and/or hardware
> > :-)
> >
> > It could be that the higher setting just exposes another transfer
> > setting bug, like maximum number of segments or segment size, etc.
> >
> > -- 
> > Jens Axboe
> > 
> 
> 


---
~Randy

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-04-20 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603212310070.20655@nacho.alt.net>
2006-03-30  8:54 ` erich
2006-03-30 15:46   ` Chris Caputo
     [not found]     ` <004a01c65470$412daaa0$b100a8c0@erich2003>
     [not found]       ` <20060330192057.4bd8c568.akpm@osdl.org>
     [not found]         ` <20060331074237.GH14022@suse.de>
2006-03-31  8:36           ` erich
2006-04-12 13:20           ` erich
2006-04-19 10:40             ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-19 13:16               ` erich
2006-04-19 13:19                 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20  1:54                   ` erich
2006-04-20  6:42                     ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20  8:11                       ` erich
2006-04-20  8:23                         ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20  9:32                           ` erich
2006-04-20  9:39                             ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20 12:53                           ` James Bottomley
2006-04-20 15:38                         ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2006-04-25  8:45                           ` erich
2006-04-25 16:02                             ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-04-26  3:24                               ` erich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060420083812.d47a74bb.rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --to=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=billion.wu@areca.com.tw \
    --cc=ccaputo@alt.net \
    --cc=dax@gurulabs.com \
    --cc=erich@areca.com.tw \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matti.aarnio@zmailer.org \
    --cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®