* Is gcc 3.2.2 suitable for kernel builds?
@ 2004-01-27 6:15 John Heil
2004-01-27 10:19 ` m0sia
2004-01-27 10:37 ` Daniel Andersen
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: John Heil @ 2004-01-27 6:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
It seems that some gcc 3.2.2 optimizations are generating
bogus code sequences.
Has anyone else had compiler issues w gcc 3.2.2?
Thanks much,
johnh
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
John Heil
South Coast Software
Custom systems software for UNIX and IBM MVS mainframes
1-714-774-6952
johnhscs@sc-software.com
http://www.sc-software.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Is gcc 3.2.2 suitable for kernel builds?
2004-01-27 6:15 Is gcc 3.2.2 suitable for kernel builds? John Heil
@ 2004-01-27 10:19 ` m0sia
2004-01-27 10:37 ` Daniel Andersen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: m0sia @ 2004-01-27 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Heil; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:15:29 -0800 (PST)
John Heil <kerndev@sc-software.com> wrote:
>
> It seems that some gcc 3.2.2 optimizations are generating
> bogus code sequences.
>
> Has anyone else had compiler issues w gcc 3.2.2?
>
> Thanks much,
>
> johnh
>
> -
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> John Heil
> South Coast Software
> Custom systems software for UNIX and IBM MVS mainframes
> 1-714-774-6952
> johnhscs@sc-software.com
> http://www.sc-software.com
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
I'm using gcc 3.2.2 and everything is "ok". What optimization are you
using? Maybe you will upgrade to 3.2.3?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Is gcc 3.2.2 suitable for kernel builds?
2004-01-27 6:15 Is gcc 3.2.2 suitable for kernel builds? John Heil
2004-01-27 10:19 ` m0sia
@ 2004-01-27 10:37 ` Daniel Andersen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Andersen @ 2004-01-27 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Heil; +Cc: linux-kernel
> It seems that some gcc 3.2.2 optimizations are generating
> bogus code sequences.
>
> Has anyone else had compiler issues w gcc 3.2.2?
>
> Thanks much,
>
> johnh
As recently posted in a thread "gcc 2.95.3", please have a look at
http://developer.osdl.org/cherry/compile/
3.2.2 and 2.6.x should work fine under most circumstances.
What kernel-version, optimizations and architecture are you using?
Daniel Andersen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-27 10:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-27 6:15 Is gcc 3.2.2 suitable for kernel builds? John Heil
2004-01-27 10:19 ` m0sia
2004-01-27 10:37 ` Daniel Andersen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome