mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Peter J. Stieber" <developer@toyon.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 10:29:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00bb01c558aa$75bb2210$1600a8c0@toyon.corp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01cd01c55805$df437cf0$1600a8c0@toyon.corp>

CW = Christopher Warner
CW>>>>>> 2.6.11.5 kernel,
CW>>>>>> Tyan S2882/dual AMD 246 opterons
CW>>>>>> sh:18983: mm/memory.c:99: bad pmd
CW>>>>>> ffff810005974cc8(00007ffffffffe46).
CW>>>>>> sh:18983: mm/memory.c:99: bad pmd
CW>>>>>> ffff810005974cd0(00007ffffffffe47).

DJ = Dave Jones
DJ>>>>> That's the 3rd or 4th time I've seen this
DJ>>>>> reported on this hardware.
DJ>>>>> It's not exclusive to it, but it does seem more
DJ>>>>> susceptible for some reason. Spooky.

AK = Andi Kleen wrote:
AK>>>> It seems to be clear now that it is hardware
AK>>>> independent.
AK>>>>
AK>>>> I actually got it once now too, but only after
AK>>>> 24+h stress test :/
AK>>>>
AK>>>> I have a better debugging patch now that I will be
AK>>>> testing soon, hopefully that turns something up.

DJ = Dave Jones
DJ>>> Ok, I'm respinning the Fedora update kernel today
DJ>>> for other reasons, if you have that patch in time,
DJ>>> I'll toss it in too.
DJ>>>
DJ>>> Though as yet, no further reports from our users.

PJS = Peter J. Stieber
PJS> I posted some information on the fedora-list
PJS> concerning my experience with this problem. I
PJS> am using a Tyan S2885/dual 244 Opterons. For HW and
PJS> driver details see:
PJS> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2005-May/msg01690.html
PJS> I have been using Dave's FC3 test kernel
PJS> (2.6.11-1.24_FC3smp) for a little over a day and
PJS> have been unable to generate the problem with the
PJS> computer under a larger than normal load.
PJS>
PJS> Prior to May 12, I had been seeing the problem very
PJS> regularly. It started around April 14. I believe this
PJS> is about the time I first started using the
PJS> 2.6.11-1.14_FC3smp kernel. I remember I had to get a
PJS> BIOS upgrade from Tyan
PJS> (http://www.tyan.com/support/html/b_s2885.html
PJS> unfortunately a Beta release) to get my network back
PJS> once I started using the new kernel. After that the
PJS> memory.c messages started showing up. I though it
PJS> might be BIOS related (see the note on the referenced
PJS> Tyan page), but when I saw Christopher's post I
PJS> thought maybe it was the kernel because his MOBO
PJS> doesn't have a Beta BIOS release. I googled and
PJS> found this thread, and subscribed to this list.
PJS>
PJS> I have "memory.c:97 bad pmd" entries in my
PJS> /var/log/messages files going back to April 14.
PJS> The only days I don't have them are April 20, 22, 23,
PJS> 24 and April 29 (22, 23, and 24 are a weekend with
PJS> less activity). I have had them every day in May
PJS> until I installed Dave's test kernel.
PJS>
PJS> I am very computer literate, but not a kernel
PJS> developer. I hope I didn't offend you guys by
PJS> posting here. I would be willing to be your guinea
PJS> pig for testing. Currently I am unable to reproduce
PJS> the problem. If I am able to reproduce the problem,
PJS> would you prefer I post here or on the
PJS> fedora list?
PJS>
PJS> Thanks for all of your efforts,

My Tyan S2885 just exhibited the problem with Dave's test FC3 kernel
(2.6.11-1.24_FC3smp):

May 14 10:00:18 maggie kernel: collect2:14167: mm/memory.c:98: bad pmd
ffff81005856d008(0000000000000008).
May 14 10:00:18 maggie kernel: collect2:14167: mm/memory.c:98: bad pmd
ffff81005856d018(0000000000000009).
May 14 10:00:18 maggie kernel: collect2:14167: mm/memory.c:98: bad pmd
ffff81005856d020(0000000000401b80).
May 14 10:00:18 maggie kernel: collect2:14167: mm/memory.c:98: bad pmd
ffff81005856d028(000000000000000b).
May 14 10:00:18 maggie kernel: collect2:14167: mm/memory.c:98: bad pmd
ffff81005856d030(00000000000001f4).
May 14 10:00:18 maggie kernel: collect2:14167: mm/memory.c:98: bad pmd
ffff81005856d038(000000000000000c).
May 14 10:00:18 maggie kernel: collect2:14167: mm/memory.c:98: bad pmd
ffff81005856d040(00000000000001f4).
May 14 10:00:18 maggie kernel: collect2:14167: mm/memory.c:98: bad pmd
ffff81005856d048(000000000000000d).
May 14 10:00:18 maggie kernel: collect2:14167: mm/memory.c:98: bad pmd
ffff81005856d050(00000000000001f7).
May 14 10:00:18 maggie kernel: collect2:14167: mm/memory.c:98: bad pmd
ffff81005856d058(000000000000000e).
May 14 10:00:18 maggie kernel: collect2:14167: mm/memory.c:98: bad pmd
ffff81005856d060(00000000000001f7).
May 14 10:00:18 maggie kernel: collect2:14167: mm/memory.c:98: bad pmd
ffff81005856d068(0000000000000017).
May 14 10:00:18 maggie kernel: collect2:14167: mm/memory.c:98: bad pmd
ffff81005856d078(000000000000000f).
May 14 10:00:18 maggie kernel: collect2:14167: mm/memory.c:98: bad pmd
ffff81005856d080(00007ffffffff0a4).
May 14 10:00:18 maggie kernel: collect2:14167: mm/memory.c:98: bad pmd
ffff81005856d0a0(5f36387800000000).
May 14 10:00:18 maggie kernel: collect2:14167: mm/memory.c:98: bad pmd
ffff81005856d0a8(0000000000003436).

It died while running configure. It was attempting to use gcc to make
sure C compiling was possible. In the past, if I run the script a second
time it works.

Sorry for my ignorance, but what other information do you need?
Pete 



      reply	other threads:[~2005-05-14 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-30 21:44 x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 Dave Jones
2005-03-31 10:41 ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-31 21:52   ` Dave Jones
2005-04-01 11:52     ` Sergey S. Kostyliov
2005-04-07  2:49   ` Dave Jones
2005-04-07  6:29     ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-14 13:54       ` Hugh Dickins
2005-04-14 17:01         ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-14 17:34           ` Hugh Dickins
2005-04-14 18:10             ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-14 18:11               ` x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II Andi Kleen
2005-04-14 18:27                 ` Chris Wright
2005-04-15 17:24                   ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-15 17:28                     ` Chris Wright
2005-04-15 17:58                       ` Hugh Dickins
2005-04-15 18:07                         ` Dave Jones
2005-04-22 17:37                           ` Debugging patch was " Andi Kleen
2005-04-27 14:23                           ` New debugging " Andi Kleen
2005-04-27 17:37                             ` Dave Jones
2005-04-29 11:07                               ` Hans Kristian Rosbach
2005-04-19 13:35                         ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-19 15:52                           ` Hugh Dickins
2005-04-29 11:12                             ` Christopher Warner
2005-04-29 16:13                               ` Chris Wright
2005-04-29 17:32                               ` Dave Jones
2005-05-02 17:00                                 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-02 15:28                                   ` Christopher Warner
2005-05-02 20:33                                     ` Chris Wright
2005-05-02 21:08                                       ` Dave Jones
2005-05-03 14:28                                         ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-03 15:15                                           ` Dave Jones
2005-05-10  9:36                                     ` Christopher Warner
2005-05-10 16:26                                       ` Chris Wright
2005-05-10 12:03                                         ` Christopher Warner
2005-05-10 16:38                                       ` Dave Jones
2005-05-10 16:46                                         ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-10 16:59                                           ` Dave Jones
2005-05-10 20:32                                             ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-10 20:43                                               ` Chris Wright
2005-05-12 21:23                                             ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-13 21:51                                               ` Peter J. Stieber
2005-05-14 17:29                                                 ` Peter J. Stieber [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='00bb01c558aa$75bb2210$1600a8c0@toyon.corp' \
    --to=developer@toyon.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®