From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
"Sergey S. Kostyliov" <rathamahata@ehouse.ru>,
Clem Taylor <clem.taylor@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 19:24:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050415172408.GB8511@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050414182712.GG493@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 11:27:12AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de) wrote:
> > > I will take a closer look at the rc1/rc2 patches later this evening
> > > and see if I can spot something. Can only report back tomorrow though.
> >
> > Actually itt started in .11 already - sigh - on rereading the thread.
> > That will make the code audit harder :/
>
> Yes, I've seen it in .11 and earlier kernels. Happen to have same
> "x86_64" string on my bad pmd dumps, but can't reproduce it at all.
> So, for now, I can hold off on adding the reload cr3 patch to -stable
> unless you think it should be there anyway.
It is a bug fix (actually there is another related patch that fixes
a similar bug), but we lived with the problems for years so I guess
they can wait for .12.
If there was a fix for the bad pmd problem it might be a candidate
for stable, but so far we dont know what causes it yet.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-15 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-30 21:44 x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 Dave Jones
2005-03-31 10:41 ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-31 21:52 ` Dave Jones
2005-04-01 11:52 ` Sergey S. Kostyliov
2005-04-07 2:49 ` Dave Jones
2005-04-07 6:29 ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-14 13:54 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-04-14 17:01 ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-14 17:34 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-04-14 18:10 ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-14 18:11 ` x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II Andi Kleen
2005-04-14 18:27 ` Chris Wright
2005-04-15 17:24 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2005-04-15 17:28 ` Chris Wright
2005-04-15 17:58 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-04-15 18:07 ` Dave Jones
2005-04-22 17:37 ` Debugging patch was " Andi Kleen
2005-04-27 14:23 ` New debugging " Andi Kleen
2005-04-27 17:37 ` Dave Jones
2005-04-29 11:07 ` Hans Kristian Rosbach
2005-04-19 13:35 ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-19 15:52 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-04-29 11:12 ` Christopher Warner
2005-04-29 16:13 ` Chris Wright
2005-04-29 17:32 ` Dave Jones
2005-05-02 17:00 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-02 15:28 ` Christopher Warner
2005-05-02 20:33 ` Chris Wright
2005-05-02 21:08 ` Dave Jones
2005-05-03 14:28 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-03 15:15 ` Dave Jones
2005-05-10 9:36 ` Christopher Warner
2005-05-10 16:26 ` Chris Wright
2005-05-10 12:03 ` Christopher Warner
2005-05-10 16:38 ` Dave Jones
2005-05-10 16:46 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-10 16:59 ` Dave Jones
2005-05-10 20:32 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-10 20:43 ` Chris Wright
2005-05-12 21:23 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-13 21:51 ` Peter J. Stieber
2005-05-14 17:29 ` Peter J. Stieber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050415172408.GB8511@wotan.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=clem.taylor@gmail.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rathamahata@ehouse.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®