What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Martin Eriksson]

I'm hearing rumours about my University wanting to set up a cluster with AMD
Athlon XP+DDR computers, so I wonder what chipset is most stable under
Linux?

I assume it's the AMD DDR chipset, but I want to be pretty sure.

Btw, do compilators currently optimize for the third floating-point unit in
Athlon XP processors?

_____________________________________________________
|  Martin Eriksson <nitrax@giron.wox.org>
|  MSc CSE student, department of Computing Science
|  Umeå University, Sweden

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Pascal Schmidt]

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Martin Eriksson wrote:

> I'm hearing rumours about my University wanting to set up a cluster with AMD
> Athlon XP+DDR computers, so I wonder what chipset is most stable under
> Linux?
> I assume it's the AMD DDR chipset, but I want to be pretty sure.

I have no problems with the ALi Magik 1 chipset. I'm running a 1 GHz Duron 
with 512 MB DDR-RAM at the moment.

-- 
Ciao, Pascal

-<[ pharao90@tzi.de, netmail 2:241/215.72, home http://cobol.cjb.net/) ]>-

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Jeffrey W. Baker]

On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 05:19, Martin Eriksson wrote:
> I'm hearing rumours about my University wanting to set up a cluster with AMD
> Athlon XP+DDR computers, so I wonder what chipset is most stable under
> Linux?
> 
> I assume it's the AMD DDR chipset, but I want to be pretty sure.

I have no problems with the 1400MHz Athlon on AMD 760, including DRI
using the AGP bridge.

-jwb

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Calin A. Culianu]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN, Size: 2268 bytes --]

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Martin Eriksson wrote:

> I'm hearing rumours about my University wanting to set up a cluster with AMD
> Athlon XP+DDR computers, so I wonder what chipset is most stable under
> Linux?
>
> I assume it's the AMD DDR chipset, but I want to be pretty sure.
>
> Btw, do compilators currently optimize for the third floating-point unit in
> Athlon XP processors?

Well, here's my little anecdote:

We bought 33 1.4 GHz AMD Athlons (non-XP) with the slightly deprecated VIA
KT266 Chipset (Spacewalker AK31 motherboards.. not exactly the Lexus of
the M/B world but oh well)..

Anyway, after trying various (2.4) kernel versions, both with and without
the new VM, both with and without Alan's magik, I can say that the only
way we got 99% uptime on these systems (as opposed to like the 70% uptime
I was getting from random kernel oopses) was to turn any Athlon and/or
Pentium optimizations off when compiling the kernel.  With any form of
compilation for a CPU >386, the kernel would crash on at least 2 of the
boxes per day.  The oops stack trace seemed to always indicate a crash
when in the paging code.. so it was a virtual memory problem? (I can only
speculate and I haven't bothered to investigate much further).  I am not
sure if I encountered some unknown bug in my motherboard that needs some
yet undiscovered workaround or what.  All I can say is stay away from the
KT266 chipset (however the newer KT266A seems to work fine based on what I
have seen and am told) if you can.  But then again I may be crazy and/or
there may be workarounds or bios fixes for my problem, if it was really
kernel-related. (I suspect it was, but haven't bothered to figure out
exactly how to reproduce it so as to submit a patch.. the systems would
crash randomly and invesitigating it futher seemed onerous).

-Calin

>
> _____________________________________________________
> |  Martin Eriksson <nitrax@giron.wox.org>
> |  MSc CSE student, department of Computing Science
> |  Umeå University, Sweden
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Brian]

We've tried a number of boards for our application servers and the only UP 
AMD DDR board I trust right now is the Gigabyte GA-7DX.  They are rock 
solid.

Other AMD 761 boards may work, but I've made too many late night trips to 
the colo to stray from what I know works.  DDR support seems to be the 
breaking point on most boards.

	-- Brian

On Tuesday 13 November 2001 04:08 pm, Calin A. Culianu wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Martin Eriksson wrote:
> > I'm hearing rumours about my University wanting to set up a cluster
> > with AMD Athlon XP+DDR computers, so I wonder what chipset is most
> > stable under Linux?
> >
> > I assume it's the AMD DDR chipset, but I want to be pretty sure.
> >
> > Btw, do compilators currently optimize for the third floating-point
> > unit in Athlon XP processors?
>
> Well, here's my little anecdote:
>
> We bought 33 1.4 GHz AMD Athlons (non-XP) with the slightly deprecated
> VIA KT266 Chipset (Spacewalker AK31 motherboards.. not exactly the Lexus
> of the M/B world but oh well)..

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Paul G. Allen]

Brian wrote:
> 
> We've tried a number of boards for our application servers and the only UP
> AMD DDR board I trust right now is the Gigabyte GA-7DX.  They are rock
> solid.
> 
> Other AMD 761 boards may work, but I've made too many late night trips to
> the colo to stray from what I know works.  DDR support seems to be the
> breaking point on most boards.
> 

Another thing to remember about Athlons is they need power and cooling. I've seen many a system with either a cheap power supply or a poorly ventilated case,
and often both. Athlons WILL push the hardware harder, not to mention the power they suck down themselves, and need a power supply that can handle the load as
well as the fast switching transitions. They also require more cooling, and not just on the CPU, but also on the chipset and throughout the case.

My dual 1.4GHz (K7 Thunder) has 12 fans in it. My single 1.4GHz has 8. They both have 400W+ power supplies.

PGA
-- 
Paul G. Allen
UNIX Admin II/Programmer
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
www.akamai.com
Work: (858)909-3630

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Calin A. Culianu]

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Paul G. Allen wrote:

> Brian wrote:
> >
> > We've tried a number of boards for our application servers and the only UP
> > AMD DDR board I trust right now is the Gigabyte GA-7DX.  They are rock
> > solid.
> >
> > Other AMD 761 boards may work, but I've made too many late night trips to
> > the colo to stray from what I know works.  DDR support seems to be the
> > breaking point on most boards.
> >
>
> Another thing to remember about Athlons is they need power and cooling. I've seen many a system with either a cheap power supply or a poorly ventilated case,
> and often both. Athlons WILL push the hardware harder, not to mention the power they suck down themselves, and need a power supply that can handle the load as
> well as the fast switching transitions. They also require more cooling, and not just on the CPU, but also on the chipset and throughout the case.

Very true.  I think good numbers to shoot for are like around 40-50
degrees C for the CPU temp, probably a bit lower for the M/B temp (like
around high 30's?).

>
> My dual 1.4GHz (K7 Thunder) has 12 fans in it. My single 1.4GHz has 8. They both have 400W+ power supplies.
>
> PGA
>

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Stuart Young]

At 05:39 PM 13/11/01 -0500, Calin A. Culianu wrote:
> > > Other AMD 761 boards may work, but I've made too many late night trips to
> > > the colo to stray from what I know works.  DDR support seems to be the
> > > breaking point on most boards.
> >
> > Another thing to remember about Athlons is they need power and cooling.
>
>Very true.  I think good numbers to shoot for are like around 40-50
>degrees C for the CPU temp, probably a bit lower for the M/B temp (like
>around high 30's?).

I get from 26-36 (Celsius) for the chipset, and 32-45 for the CPU at the 
moment. Average of 6-9 degrees difference between chipset and CPU. Main 
thing that changes this is ambient air temp, and not process load. I don't 
use APM or ACPI to put the cpu into power saving stuff in idle or shutting 
down drives or what not, so my temp stays quite stable.

Cases are in general badly designed, and do not allow for any decent 
airflow, wether convectional or forced. I've noticed this leading to all 
sorts of failure, particularly in hard drives, which do not like heat at 
all (and if someone could please shoot the nutcase at WD who started 
wrapping their drives in rubber cases.. I'd be immensely grateful *grin*). 
It's not too hard to augment some normal cases to have some decent airflow. 
Just make sure to turn off all the power saving features (APM, ACPI, etc) 
otherwise you won't get reliable results that you can compare against.

> > My dual 1.4GHz (K7 Thunder) has 12 fans in it. My single 1.4GHz has 8. 
> They both have 400W+ power supplies.

I'm running a 1.4Ghz fine with 4 x 80mm fans (really nice case with very 
good airflow - about 120cfm in my case - it's a rackmount 3RU case known as 
a Spinserver) and a 7000rpm fan on the CPU heatsink that has a copper core 
(in which almost all the air that goes through the case goes past the CPU 
heatsink). The m/board in this is an Asus A7M (AMD761 & Via 686b). Also in 
the damn thing is a GeForce3, SBLive! and a 3Com 3c905B, so they add to the 
extra juice draw (and the heat), and I run quite happily on a 300W PSU.

This system of mine was previously stable with 2.4.7, then 2.4.9, then it 
wouldn't work properly with anything till 2.4.14. Now I get great disk 
throughput, fast mem IO, and even better frame rates in OpenGL apps (using 
the binary Nvidia driver no less, telling it to use AGPgart) than any 
previous kernel. And it's the most stable system I've run as a user system 
(and I do hit it pretty hard sometimes).

And yeah, a user (desktop) machine in rackmount case may not make sense 
some people, but it's fine for me. *grin*


AMC Enterprises P/L    - Stuart Young
First Floor            - Network and Systems Admin
3 Chesterville Rd      - sgy@amc.com.au
Cheltenham Vic 3192    - Ph:  (03) 9584-2700
http://www.amc.com.au/ - Fax: (03) 9584-2755

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Calin A. Culianu]

On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Stuart Young wrote:

> At 05:39 PM 13/11/01 -0500, Calin A. Culianu wrote:
> > > > Other AMD 761 boards may work, but I've made too many late night trips to
> > > > the colo to stray from what I know works.  DDR support seems to be the
> > > > breaking point on most boards.
> > >
> > > Another thing to remember about Athlons is they need power and cooling.
> >
> >Very true.  I think good numbers to shoot for are like around 40-50
> >degrees C for the CPU temp, probably a bit lower for the M/B temp (like
> >around high 30's?).
>
> I get from 26-36 (Celsius) for the chipset, and 32-45 for the CPU at the
> moment. Average of 6-9 degrees difference between chipset and CPU. Main
> thing that changes this is ambient air temp, and not process load. I don't
> use APM or ACPI to put the cpu into power saving stuff in idle or shutting
> down drives or what not, so my temp stays quite stable.
>
> Cases are in general badly designed, and do not allow for any decent
> airflow, wether convectional or forced. I've noticed this leading to all
> sorts of failure, particularly in hard drives, which do not like heat at
> all (and if someone could please shoot the nutcase at WD who started
> wrapping their drives in rubber cases.. I'd be immensely grateful *grin*).
> It's not too hard to augment some normal cases to have some decent airflow.
> Just make sure to turn off all the power saving features (APM, ACPI, etc)
> otherwise you won't get reliable results that you can compare against.

Yes, true.  At least while testing out your cooling setup, it helps to
have the cpu heating up as much as it can.  That pesky 'hlt'
instruction... :)

 >
> > > My dual 1.4GHz (K7 Thunder) has 12 fans in it. My single 1.4GHz has 8.
> > They both have 400W+ power supplies.
>
> I'm running a 1.4Ghz fine with 4 x 80mm fans (really nice case with very
> good airflow - about 120cfm in my case - it's a rackmount 3RU case known as
> a Spinserver) and a 7000rpm fan on the CPU heatsink that has a copper core
> (in which almost all the air that goes through the case goes past the CPU
> heatsink). The m/board in this is an Asus A7M (AMD761 & Via 686b). Also in
> the damn thing is a GeForce3, SBLive! and a 3Com 3c905B, so they add to the
> extra juice draw (and the heat), and I run quite happily on a 300W PSU.
>
> This system of mine was previously stable with 2.4.7, then 2.4.9, then it
> wouldn't work properly with anything till 2.4.14. Now I get great disk
> throughput, fast mem IO, and even better frame rates in OpenGL apps (using
> the binary Nvidia driver no less, telling it to use AGPgart) than any
> previous kernel. And it's the most stable system I've run as a user system
> (and I do hit it pretty hard sometimes).
>
> And yeah, a user (desktop) machine in rackmount case may not make sense
> some people, but it's fine for me. *grin*
>
>
> AMC Enterprises P/L    - Stuart Young
> First Floor            - Network and Systems Admin
> 3 Chesterville Rd      - sgy@amc.com.au
> Cheltenham Vic 3192    - Ph:  (03) 9584-2700
> http://www.amc.com.au/ - Fax: (03) 9584-2755
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[David S. Miller]

   From: Brian <hiryuu@envisiongames.net>
   Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 16:37:28 -0500

   We've tried a number of boards for our application servers and the only UP 
   AMD DDR board I trust right now is the Gigabyte GA-7DX.  They are rock 
   solid.
   
Try to use the AGP slot with a Radeon of GeForce card, do something
as simple as playing some quake with com_maxfps > 85 and the machine
will hang solidly.

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Dan Hollis]

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
> Try to use the AGP slot with a Radeon of GeForce card, do something
> as simple as playing some quake with com_maxfps > 85 and the machine
> will hang solidly.

I thought there was a northbridge configuration workaroud for this errata.
(And no smarty pants replies like "yeah, dont use AGP")

-Dan
-- 
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Brian]

The original question was for a cluster (of, presumably, servers).
If you're playing a quake client on an application server, you deserve 
what you get.

	-- Brian

On Tuesday 13 November 2001 09:32 pm, David S. Miller wrote:
>    From: Brian <hiryuu@envisiongames.net>
>    Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 16:37:28 -0500
>
>    We've tried a number of boards for our application servers and the
> only UP AMD DDR board I trust right now is the Gigabyte GA-7DX.  They
> are rock solid.
>
> Try to use the AGP slot with a Radeon of GeForce card, do something
> as simple as playing some quake with com_maxfps > 85 and the machine
> will hang solidly.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
> in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Joel Jaeggli]

I have three asus a7v266 with 40-60 day uptimes under load at this point. 
these have the older version of the via kt266 chipset.

joelja


On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Brian wrote:

> The original question was for a cluster (of, presumably, servers).
> If you're playing a quake client on an application server, you deserve 
> what you get.
> 
> 	-- Brian
> 
> On Tuesday 13 November 2001 09:32 pm, David S. Miller wrote:
> >    From: Brian <hiryuu@envisiongames.net>
> >    Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 16:37:28 -0500
> >
> >    We've tried a number of boards for our application servers and the
> > only UP AMD DDR board I trust right now is the Gigabyte GA-7DX.  They
> > are rock solid.
> >
> > Try to use the AGP slot with a Radeon of GeForce card, do something
> > as simple as playing some quake with com_maxfps > 85 and the machine
> > will hang solidly.
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
> > in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Joel Jaeggli				       joelja@darkwing.uoregon.edu    
Academic User Services			     consult@gladstone.uoregon.edu
     PGP Key Fingerprint: 1DE9 8FCA 51FB 4195 B42A 9C32 A30D 121E
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is clear that the arm of criticism cannot replace the criticism of
arms.  Karl Marx -- Introduction to the critique of Hegel's Philosophy of
the right, 1843.

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Calin A. Culianu]

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Joel Jaeggli wrote:

> I have three asus a7v266 with 40-60 day uptimes under load at this point.
> these have the older version of the via kt266 chipset.

Ok, actually i was a little drastic there.  I think maybe I should have
said "shuttle AK31 motherboards with the kt266 seem problematic at leasts
in my experience".  Yeah many people seem to be using the kt266 just fine.

Are you running with Athlon or pentium optimizations turned on?

-Calin

>
> joelja
>
>
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Brian wrote:
>
> > The original question was for a cluster (of, presumably, servers).
> > If you're playing a quake client on an application server, you deserve
> > what you get.
> >
> > 	-- Brian
> >
> > On Tuesday 13 November 2001 09:32 pm, David S. Miller wrote:
> > >    From: Brian <hiryuu@envisiongames.net>
> > >    Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 16:37:28 -0500
> > >
> > >    We've tried a number of boards for our application servers and the
> > > only UP AMD DDR board I trust right now is the Gigabyte GA-7DX.  They
> > > are rock solid.
> > >
> > > Try to use the AGP slot with a Radeon of GeForce card, do something
> > > as simple as playing some quake with com_maxfps > 85 and the machine
> > > will hang solidly.
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
> > > in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
>
>

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[David S. Miller]

   From: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>
   Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 19:05:11 -0800 (PST)

   On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
   > Try to use the AGP slot with a Radeon of GeForce card, do something
   > as simple as playing some quake with com_maxfps > 85 and the machine
   > will hang solidly.
   
   I thought there was a northbridge configuration workaroud for this errata.
   (And no smarty pants replies like "yeah, dont use AGP")
   
No, the AMD761 AGP problems have no known fixes (outside of AMD).
AMD's windows drivers have the workarounds.

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Dan Hollis]

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
> Try to use the AGP slot with a Radeon of GeForce card, do something
> as simple as playing some quake with com_maxfps > 85 and the machine
> will hang solidly.

BTW this bug apparently doesnt affect AMD760MP as I am able to use
geforce2 with quake and unreal tournament for hours straight without any
problems.

Havent tried radeon on 760MP. But geforce2 works fine.

-Dan
-- 
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[David S. Miller]

   From: Brian <hiryuu@envisiongames.net>
   Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 22:11:29 -0500

   The original question was for a cluster (of, presumably, servers).
   If you're playing a quake client on an application server, you deserve 
   what you get.
   
Yes, but the "is rock solid" statement sounded rather
generic and I wanted to correct that :-)

Franks a lot,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Mike Dresser]

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, David S. Miller wrote:

>    From: Brian <hiryuu@envisiongames.net>
>    Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 22:11:29 -0500
>
>    The original question was for a cluster (of, presumably, servers).
>    If you're playing a quake client on an application server, you deserve
>    what you get.
>
> Yes, but the "is rock solid" statement sounded rather
> generic and I wanted to correct that :-)

Talcum, or diamond?


Mike

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[David S. Miller]

   From: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>
   Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 19:11:56 -0800 (PST)

   BTW this bug apparently doesnt affect AMD760MP as I am able to use
   geforce2 with quake and unreal tournament for hours straight without any
   problems.

What is your quake3 com_maxfps set to?  By default it is 85, and
that can hide the bug.  Set it to 130 or something like that.

Just bring down the quake3 console (with ') and type

/com_maxfps 130

Try that for a while.

I'm rather sure the AMD761 problems are motherboard vendor
independant, because I have 2 systems so far, using totally different
AMD761 based motherboards, which both hang pretty reliably with AGP.

Franks a lot,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Ion Badulescu]

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 19:16:07 -0800 (PST), David S. Miller <davem@redhat.com> wrote:
>   From: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>
>   Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 19:11:56 -0800 (PST)
> 
>   BTW this bug apparently doesnt affect AMD760MP as I am able to use
>   geforce2 with quake and unreal tournament for hours straight without any
>   problems.
> 
> I'm rather sure the AMD761 problems are motherboard vendor
> independant, because I have 2 systems so far, using totally different
> AMD761 based motherboards, which both hang pretty reliably with AGP.

As far as I know, the 760MP chipset uses a 762 North Bridge, not a 761. 
That might explain why the 760MP is stable and the 760 is not.

Ion

-- 
  It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool,
            than to open it and remove all doubt.

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Paul G. Allen]

"David S. Miller" wrote:
> 
>    From: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>
>    Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 19:11:56 -0800 (PST)
> 
>    BTW this bug apparently doesnt affect AMD760MP as I am able to use
>    geforce2 with quake and unreal tournament for hours straight without any
>    problems.
> 
> What is your quake3 com_maxfps set to?  By default it is 85, and
> that can hide the bug.  Set it to 130 or something like that.
> 
> Just bring down the quake3 console (with ') and type
> 
> /com_maxfps 130
> 
> Try that for a while.
> 
> I'm rather sure the AMD761 problems are motherboard vendor
> independant, because I have 2 systems so far, using totally different
> AMD761 based motherboards, which both hang pretty reliably with AGP.
> 

My dual Tyan runs Q3A, UT, and Tribes 2 at over 100fps at times with no problems UNLESS I enable DMA for the IDE drive. Q3a will go above 130fps (map and game
dependent), UT will go even higher, and Tribes 2 will hit right around 140fps if I'm in a room (any outdoor areas slow WAY down).

I am running 2.4.9ac10 with a few minor tweaks, agpgart slightly tweaked compiled in, and a tweaked Detonator 3 nVidia driver. I plan to upgrade all these soon
and see what happens.

My A7V133 however is crap when it comes to playing games. It's been demoted to straight server duty. :)

PGA
-- 
Paul G. Allen
UNIX Admin II/Programmer
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
www.akamai.com
Work: (858)909-3630

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Dan Hollis]

On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Paul G. Allen wrote:
> I am running 2.4.9ac10 with a few minor tweaks, agpgart slightly tweaked
> compiled in, and a tweaked Detonator 3 nVidia driver
                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
???

-Dan
-- 
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Stuart Young]

At 05:15 PM 14/11/01 -0800, Dan Hollis wrote:
>On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Paul G. Allen wrote:
> > I am running 2.4.9ac10 with a few minor tweaks, agpgart slightly tweaked
> > compiled in, and a tweaked Detonator 3 nVidia driver
>                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>???

Damn binary thing.

It's the same core code as the Windows Detonator 3 driver. Hence the mention.

The next one will be based on the Detonator 4 core code, so things like 
OpenGL 1.3 (which is supposedly available with the Detonator 4 drivers 
under Windows) will be available.

Paul, you may want to see my post earlier re 2.4.14 vanilla and my 
experiences so far, which have all been good.


AMC Enterprises P/L    - Stuart Young
First Floor            - Network and Systems Admin
3 Chesterville Rd      - sgy@amc.com.au
Cheltenham Vic 3192    - Ph:  (03) 9584-2700
http://www.amc.com.au/ - Fax: (03) 9584-2755

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Paul G. Allen]

Stuart Young wrote:
> 
> At 05:15 PM 14/11/01 -0800, Dan Hollis wrote:
> >On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Paul G. Allen wrote:
> > > I am running 2.4.9ac10 with a few minor tweaks, agpgart slightly tweaked
> > > compiled in, and a tweaked Detonator 3 nVidia driver
> >                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >???
> 

I made a couple small changes so that it would recognize the MP chipset and not drop to a generic operational mode. The generic mode did not work properly and
would cause occasional system hangs. Fast writes still won't work, but I think a BIOS upgrade might fix that.

> Damn binary thing.
> 
> It's the same core code as the Windows Detonator 3 driver. Hence the mention.
> 
> The next one will be based on the Detonator 4 core code, so things like
> OpenGL 1.3 (which is supposedly available with the Detonator 4 drivers
> under Windows) will be available.
> 
> Paul, you may want to see my post earlier re 2.4.14 vanilla and my
> experiences so far, which have all been good.
> 

I just saw it. I am a registered nVidia developer, but have been too busy with other things (mainly working on the V12 game engine) to look into updating my
actual system software and ping on nVidia about their Linux driver. I asked them once a while back, and they said "A new driver will be released soon, so wait
for that."

I'm getting ready to do it though, since I need to wait for another developer to fix some code (in the game engine) before I can continue.

PGA
-- 
Paul G. Allen
UNIX Admin II/Programmer
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
www.akamai.com
Work: (858)909-3630

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Paul G. Allen]

Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 05:03:21PM -0800, Paul G. Allen wrote:
> 
>     I am running 2.4.9ac10 with a few minor tweaks, agpgart slightly
>     tweaked compiled in, and a tweaked Detonator 3 nVidia driver. I
>     plan to upgrade all these soon and see what happens.
> 
> Is this different from 1541? If so, where might I find this
> 

I just D/L, modified and compiled 1541. A cat of /proc/nv/card0 shows:

[root@keroon /root]# cat /proc/nv/card0 
----- Driver Info ----- 
NVRM Version: 1.0-1541
------ Card Info ------
Model:        GeForce3
IRQ:          17
Video BIOS:   03.20.00.10
------ AGP Info -------
AGP status:   Enabled
AGP Driver:   NVIDIA
Bridge:       AMD Irongate MP
SBA:          Supported [enabled]
FW:           Supported [disabled]
Rates:        4x 2x 1x  [4x]
Registers:    0x0f000217:0x00000304
[root@keroon /root]# 

So, AGP 4x and Side Band Addressing is enabled, but for some reason Fast
Writes are not. I am still using the 2.06 Tyan BIOS (as shipped) and
need to upgrade to the latest (I've had trouble getting the BIOS file
from the Tyan web site). agpgart is not compiled into this kernel, so as
you can see it's using the NVIDIA driver instead. I e-mailed developer
support at nVidia to ask why FW is disabled even though it's supported
(it could very well be the BIOS).

I also installed thier GLX libraries.

PGA
-- 
Paul G. Allen
UNIX Admin II/Network Security
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
www.akamai.com

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Gérard Roudier]

On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Paul G. Allen wrote:

> Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 05:03:21PM -0800, Paul G. Allen wrote:
> >
> >     I am running 2.4.9ac10 with a few minor tweaks, agpgart slightly
> >     tweaked compiled in, and a tweaked Detonator 3 nVidia driver. I
> >     plan to upgrade all these soon and see what happens.
> >
> > Is this different from 1541? If so, where might I find this
> >
>
> I just D/L, modified and compiled 1541. A cat of /proc/nv/card0 shows:
>
> [root@keroon /root]# cat /proc/nv/card0
> ----- Driver Info -----
> NVRM Version: 1.0-1541
> ------ Card Info ------
> Model:        GeForce3
> IRQ:          17
> Video BIOS:   03.20.00.10
> ------ AGP Info -------
> AGP status:   Enabled
> AGP Driver:   NVIDIA
> Bridge:       AMD Irongate MP
> SBA:          Supported [enabled]
> FW:           Supported [disabled]
> Rates:        4x 2x 1x  [4x]
> Registers:    0x0f000217:0x00000304
> [root@keroon /root]#
>
> So, AGP 4x and Side Band Addressing is enabled, but for some reason Fast
> Writes are not. I am still using the 2.06 Tyan BIOS (as shipped) and
> need to upgrade to the latest (I've had trouble getting the BIOS file
> from the Tyan web site). agpgart is not compiled into this kernel, so as
> you can see it's using the NVIDIA driver instead. I e-mailed developer
> support at nVidia to ask why FW is disabled even though it's supported
> (it could very well be the BIOS).

May-be, FW works quite well here, but they just want to enable it in some
future driver version and then claim 50% speed improvement. :-) :o)

To be serious, FW needs special handling in AGP, notably flow-control by
the target using WBF for example. As a result, it could well be broken for
your board forever due to some errata in signalling.

> I also installed thier GLX libraries.

You seem to like bloat. :)

  Gérard.

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[David S. Miller]

You won't see the problem with the GeForce3 because it has stricter
AGP timings.

The problem is going to show up with cards that are a little bit out
of the AGP spec, this includes the Radeon and the GeForce2.

Franks a lot,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Marvin Justice]

We've acutally had next to no hangs on the Thunder K7 using a FireGL2 card 
--- if you don't mind spending $1000+ for high end 3D graphics :-) Stay away 
from nVidia for now; though I understand they're working on fixes for this 
chipset for their next driver release. 

On Tuesday 13 November 2001 08:32 pm, David S. Miller wrote:
>    From: Brian <hiryuu@envisiongames.net>
>    Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 16:37:28 -0500
>
>    We've tried a number of boards for our application servers and the only
> UP AMD DDR board I trust right now is the Gigabyte GA-7DX.  They are rock
> solid.
>
> Try to use the AGP slot with a Radeon of GeForce card, do something
> as simple as playing some quake with com_maxfps > 85 and the machine
> will hang solidly.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-- 
Marvin Justice
Software Developer
BOXX Technologies, Inc.
www.boxxtech.com
512-235-6318 (V)
512-835-0434 (F)

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Chris Meadors]

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Marvin Justice wrote:

> We've acutally had next to no hangs on the Thunder K7 using a FireGL2 card
> --- if you don't mind spending $1000+ for high end 3D graphics :-) Stay away
> from nVidia for now; though I understand they're working on fixes for this
> chipset for their next driver release.

Saw in your sig, I know who Boxx Tech is, they build machines like I build
for myself, but for less money.  :P

Anyway, to keep this kinda kernel related.  How well supported are the
FireGL cards?  That is DRM wise, and of course X to go with that.

-Chris
-- 
Two penguins were walking on an iceberg.  The first penguin said to the
second, "you look like you are wearing a tuxedo."  The second penguin
said, "I might be..."                         --David Lynch, Twin Peaks

Re:[OT] What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Marvin Justice]

On Wednesday 14 November 2001 07:27 am, Chris Meadors wrote:
> Anyway, to keep this kinda kernel related.  How well supported are the
> FireGL cards?  That is DRM wise, and of course X to go with that.
>
> -Chris

Drivers are distributed pretty much the same way as nVidia, ie., as a binary 
core along with the necessary wrappers to compile for new kernels, private 
libGL.so, etc.  Aside from that, we've generally had pretty positive 
experiences.

These aren't quake cards; in fact the demo1 fps are  surprisingly low. In 
serious OpenGL benchmarks, however,  
(http://www.specbench.org/gpc/opc.static/opcview.htm ) they're currently the 
fastest cards available for Linux by a long shot.

I think FGL is what people at ILM, Dreamworks, Digital Domain etc. are using 
at the moment in the gradual shift toward Linux on the artist's desktop. Not 
cheap --- unless you've already forked over $16K for Maya ;-)

-- 
Marvin Justice
Software Developer
BOXX Technologies, Inc.
www.boxxtech.com
512-235-6318 (V)
512-835-0434 (F)

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Stuart Young]

At 07:16 PM 13/11/01 -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
>What is your quake3 com_maxfps set to?  By default it is 85, and
>that can hide the bug.  Set it to 130 or something like that.
>
><snip!>
>
>I'm rather sure the AMD761 problems are motherboard vendor
>independant, because I have 2 systems so far, using totally different
>AMD761 based motherboards, which both hang pretty reliably with AGP.

Last night I decided to test this out on my Asus A7M (AMD761 and VIA 686b), 
which has a 1.4 Ghz Athlon, Creative SBLive!, 3Com 3c905B, and an Asus 
V8200 (GeForce3 64Mb DDR). The case has very good airflow, at about 120 
Cubic Feet per Minute, and most of this passes past the CPU. PSU is a 300W 
Enhance (brand name) power supply - use a lot of this brand, and they are 
good quality. Linux kernel is 2.4.14 vanilla, with the Nvidia 1.0-1541 
binary driver (using kernel AGPgart, and Nvidia module options for speed), 
XFree86 4.1.0 that is currently in Debian sid. Was running at 1024x768 at 
24 bit, defaults for Q3A texture settings, sound, etc, with /com_maxfps set 
to 255. I played the single player setup against the bots (in the medium 
hardness setting - I didn't lose a round, which kept the 3D going as 
continuous as possible) from the start to the finish (all 6 tiers and the 
final Z tier) without a lockup. Note: I do not run the Riva FrameBuffer 
module, nor do I enable ANY of the APM options (eg: Make CPU Idle calls, 
Enable console blanking, etc) in the kernel, just the generic APM support 
itself - mainly so the machine shuts off automatically after shutdown).

AGP and bad Power Supplies are always a problem, especially when you try 
and exploit anything greater than 1x AGP, and the power drain really rises. 
Heat is always an issue, but with good cooling, most problems vanish.

Sure that beanie of yours isn't cutting off the circulation, or that you've 
been drinking too much V again Dave? *joke*

BTW: As a member of a group called the LGL (or Linux Gamers League) here in 
Australia, I help out a lot of people who want to get their systems running 
games, particularly 3D stuff like Q3A, UT, and Tribes2. I've been able to 
track down most of the crash issues with AMD 76x chipsets to either 1) bad 
quality components, 2) heat or 3) power supplies. Admittedly AMD 760 
(vanilla, not sure about MP) chipsets don't like doing more than 1x AGP, 
but since they are a bit old in the tooth now, this isn't so much of a 
problem for us gamers. If there was a huge issue with this, I'm sure you'd 
hear a hell of a lot of the guys and girls (yes, girls play games under 
Linux too!) in the LGL complaining about it. *grin*

Take care.


AMC Enterprises P/L    - Stuart Young
First Floor            - Network and Systems Admin
3 Chesterville Rd      - sgy@amc.com.au
Cheltenham Vic 3192    - Ph:  (03) 9584-2700
http://www.amc.com.au/ - Fax: (03) 9584-2755

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[DevilKin]

I've been pushing my AMD Abit KG7 board to the limits without crashing, 
using a Thunderbird 1.4.
Don't forget that cooling is also an important issue with these 
processors/motherboards!!

(Mobo is using an AMD 761 AGP Bridge and the rest is from Via ... (don't 
recall, not behind pc)

DK

At 16:37 13/11/2001 -0500, Brian wrote:
>We've tried a number of boards for our application servers and the only UP
>AMD DDR board I trust right now is the Gigabyte GA-7DX.  They are rock
>solid.
>
>Other AMD 761 boards may work, but I've made too many late night trips to
>the colo to stray from what I know works.  DDR support seems to be the
>breaking point on most boards.
>
>         -- Brian
>
>On Tuesday 13 November 2001 04:08 pm, Calin A. Culianu wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Martin Eriksson wrote:
> > > I'm hearing rumours about my University wanting to set up a cluster
> > > with AMD Athlon XP+DDR computers, so I wonder what chipset is most
> > > stable under Linux?
> > >
> > > I assume it's the AMD DDR chipset, but I want to be pretty sure.
> > >
> > > Btw, do compilators currently optimize for the third floating-point
> > > unit in Athlon XP processors?
> >
> > Well, here's my little anecdote:
> >
> > We bought 33 1.4 GHz AMD Athlons (non-XP) with the slightly deprecated
> > VIA KT266 Chipset (Spacewalker AK31 motherboards.. not exactly the Lexus
> > of the M/B world but oh well)..

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Dan Hollis]

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Martin Eriksson wrote:
> I'm hearing rumours about my University wanting to set up a cluster with AMD
> Athlon XP+DDR computers, so I wonder what chipset is most stable under
> Linux?
> I assume it's the AMD DDR chipset, but I want to be pretty sure.

AMD761 or AMD760MP(|X) is what you want. They seem to have by far the
least bugs of all the Athlon chipsets (and coming from AMD, you would
certainly hope so).

-Dan
-- 
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[David S. Miller]

   From: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>
   Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 13:19:07 -0800 (PST)
   
   AMD761 ... is what you want.

Unless you actually plan on actually using the AGP slot without
crashes/hangs.

Franks a lot,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[David S. Miller]

   From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
   Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:51:49 +0000 (GMT)
   
   Only if your card hits the AMD errata, and that specifically claims
   the card is the problem. It mostly appears to afflict nvidia users
   so its not a problem ;)

And radeon users...

Franks a lot,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Alan Cox]

>    From: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>
>    Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 13:19:07 -0800 (PST)
>    
>    AMD761 ... is what you want.
> 
> Unless you actually plan on actually using the AGP slot without
> crashes/hangs.

Only if your card hits the AMD errata, and that specifically claims the
card is the problem. It mostly appears to afflict nvidia users so its not
a problem ;)

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[David S. Miller]

   From: "Marek Mentel" <mmark@koala.ichpw.zabrze.pl>
   Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:57:31 -0500 (EST)
   
   Is Matrox G200 on this list ( or where can I find this  document ? )
   I am not addicted to Q3  :) , but testing my DRI configuration
   Q3 locks my system in 2-3   min after game start   . 

Ask AMD, they won't tell us...

My rule has been, if AGP usage makes it hang under Linux it must be on
their list.  Does this answer your question? :-)

Re: What Athlon chipset is most stable in Linux?

[Marek Mentel]

On Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:51:49 +0000 (GMT), Alan Cox wrote:

>>    From: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>
>>    Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 13:19:07 -0800 (PST)
>>    
>>    AMD761 ... is what you want.
>> 
>> Unless you actually plan on actually using the AGP slot without
>> crashes/hangs.
>
>Only if your card hits the AMD errata, and that specifically claims the
>card is the problem. It mostly appears to afflict nvidia users so its not
>a problem ;)

Is Matrox G200 on this list ( or where can I find this  document ? )
I am not addicted to Q3  :) , but testing my DRI configuration
Q3 locks my system in 2-3   min after game start   . 


   sytem   Abit KT7E
   AMD DURON  800
   256 MB RAM  noname
   Matrox G200  
   HD Maxtor 20 GB UDMA100
--------------------------------------------------------
 Marek Mentel  mmark@koala.ichpw.zabrze.pl  2:484/3.8          
 INSTITUTE FOR CHEMICAL PROCESSING OF COAL , Zabrze , POLAND
 NOTE: my opinions are strictly my own and not those of my employer