RE: [PATCHv2 09/11] unicore32 core architecture: timer and time handling

["Guan Xuetao" <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:arnd@arndb.de]
> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 1:31 AM
> To: Guan Xuetao
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arch@vger.kernel.org; 'Greg KH'
> Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 09/11] unicore32 core architecture: timer and time handling
> 
> On Sunday 13 February 2011, Guan Xuetao wrote:
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/unicore32/include/asm/timex.h b/arch/unicore32/include/asm/timex.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..faf16ba
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/unicore32/include/asm/timex.h
> > +#ifndef __UNICORE_TIMEX_H__
> > +#define __UNICORE_TIMEX_H__
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_FPGA
> > +
> > +/* in FPGA, APB clock is 33M, and OST clock is 32K, */
> > +/* so, 1M is selected for timer interrupt correctly */
> > +#define        CLOCK_TICK_RATE         (32*1024)
> > +
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_PUV3_DB0913)                \
> > +       || defined(CONFIG_PUV3_NB0916)  \
> > +       || defined(CONFIG_PUV3_SMW0919)
> > +
> > +#define  CLOCK_TICK_RATE         (14318000)
> > +
> > +#endif
> 
> I believe that we don't use CLOCK_TICK_RATE in the kernel any more,
> so there is no reason to define it.
CLOCK_TICK_RATE is an important value for the kernel.
And perhaps I misunderstanding your meaning...
> 
> 	Arnd

Thanks & Regards.
Guan Xuetao