From: Miaoqing Pan <quic_miaoqing@quicinc.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>,
Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, <ath11k@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] wifi: ath11k: fix dest ring-buffer corruption
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 15:03:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <026b710f-b50f-4302-ad4f-36932c2558ff@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250526114803.2122-2-johan+linaro@kernel.org>
On 5/26/2025 7:48 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Add the missing memory barriers to make sure that destination ring
> descriptors are read after the head pointers to avoid using stale data
> on weakly ordered architectures like aarch64.
>
> Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.1 WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.41
>
> Fixes: d5c65159f289 ("ath11k: driver for Qualcomm IEEE 802.11ax devices")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.6
> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_tx.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c
> index ea2959305dec..dfe2d889c20f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c
> @@ -3851,6 +3851,9 @@ int ath11k_dp_process_rx_err(struct ath11k_base *ab, struct napi_struct *napi,
>
> ath11k_hal_srng_access_begin(ab, srng);
>
> + /* Make sure descriptor is read after the head pointer. */
> + dma_rmb();
> +
Thanks Johan, for continuing to follow up on this issue. I have some
different opinions.
This change somewhat deviates from the fix approach described in
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250321095219.19369-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org/.
In this case, the descriptor might be accessed before it is updated or
while it is still being updated. Therefore, a dma_rmb() should be added
after the call to ath11k_hal_srng_dst_get_next_entry() and before
accessing ath11k_hal_ce_dst_status_get_length(), to ensure that the DMA
has completed before reading the descriptor.
However, in this patch, the memory barrier is used to protect the head
pointer (HP). I don't think a memory barrier is necessary for HP,
because even if an outdated HP is fetched,
ath11k_hal_srng_dst_get_next_entry() will return NULL and exit safely.
So, placing the memory barrier inside
ath11k_hal_srng_dst_get_next_entry() would be more appropriate.
@@ -678,6 +678,8 @@ u32 *ath11k_hal_srng_dst_get_next_entry(struct
ath11k_base *ab,
if (srng->flags & HAL_SRNG_FLAGS_CACHED)
ath11k_hal_srng_prefetch_desc(ab, srng);
+ dma_rmb();
+
return desc;
}
> while (budget &&
> (desc = ath11k_hal_srng_dst_get_next_entry(ab, srng))) {
> struct hal_reo_dest_ring *reo_desc = (struct hal_reo_dest_ring *)desc;
> @@ -4154,6 +4157,9 @@ int ath11k_dp_rx_process_wbm_err(struct ath11k_base *ab,
>
> ath11k_hal_srng_access_begin(ab, srng);
>
> + /* Make sure descriptor is read after the head pointer. */
> + dma_rmb();
> +
> while (budget) {
> rx_desc = ath11k_hal_srng_dst_get_next_entry(ab, srng);
> if (!rx_desc)
> @@ -4280,6 +4286,9 @@ int ath11k_dp_process_rxdma_err(struct ath11k_base *ab, int mac_id, int budget)
>
> ath11k_hal_srng_access_begin(ab, srng);
>
> + /* Make sure descriptor is read after the head pointer. */
> + dma_rmb();
> +
> while (quota-- &&
> (desc = ath11k_hal_srng_dst_get_next_entry(ab, srng))) {
> ath11k_hal_rx_reo_ent_paddr_get(ab, desc, &paddr, &desc_bank);
> @@ -4353,6 +4362,9 @@ void ath11k_dp_process_reo_status(struct ath11k_base *ab)
>
> ath11k_hal_srng_access_begin(ab, srng);
>
> + /* Make sure descriptor is read after the head pointer. */
> + dma_rmb();
> +
> while ((reo_desc = ath11k_hal_srng_dst_get_next_entry(ab, srng))) {
> tag = FIELD_GET(HAL_SRNG_TLV_HDR_TAG, *reo_desc);
>
> @@ -5168,6 +5180,9 @@ static void ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process(struct ath11k *ar, int mac_id,
> rx_bufs_used = 0;
> rx_mon_stats = &pmon->rx_mon_stats;
>
> + /* Make sure descriptor is read after the head pointer. */
> + dma_rmb();
> +
> while ((ring_entry = ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek(ar->ab, mon_dst_srng))) {
> struct sk_buff *head_msdu, *tail_msdu;
>
> @@ -5630,6 +5645,10 @@ static int ath11k_dp_full_mon_process_rx(struct ath11k_base *ab, int mac_id,
> spin_lock_bh(&mon_dst_srng->lock);
>
> ath11k_hal_srng_access_begin(ar->ab, mon_dst_srng);
> +
> + /* Make sure descriptor is read after the head pointer. */
> + dma_rmb();
> +
> while ((ring_entry = ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek(ar->ab, mon_dst_srng))) {
> head_msdu = NULL;
> tail_msdu = NULL;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_tx.c
> index 8522c67baabf..549d17d90503 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_tx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_tx.c
> @@ -700,6 +700,9 @@ void ath11k_dp_tx_completion_handler(struct ath11k_base *ab, int ring_id)
>
> ath11k_hal_srng_access_begin(ab, status_ring);
>
> + /* Make sure descriptor is read after the head pointer. */
> + dma_rmb();
> +
> while ((ATH11K_TX_COMPL_NEXT(tx_ring->tx_status_head) !=
> tx_ring->tx_status_tail) &&
> (desc = ath11k_hal_srng_dst_get_next_entry(ab, status_ring))) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-29 7:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-26 11:48 [PATCH 0/3] " Johan Hovold
2025-05-26 11:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Johan Hovold
2025-05-29 7:03 ` Miaoqing Pan [this message]
2025-06-02 8:03 ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-03 10:52 ` Baochen Qiang
2025-06-03 11:51 ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-04 2:16 ` Baochen Qiang
2025-06-04 6:59 ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-05 8:16 ` Baochen Qiang
2025-06-04 2:34 ` Miaoqing Pan
2025-06-04 5:32 ` Miaoqing Pan
2025-06-04 7:06 ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-04 7:57 ` Miaoqing Pan
2025-06-04 8:07 ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-04 8:18 ` Miaoqing Pan
2025-06-04 16:24 ` Jeff Johnson
2025-06-05 4:01 ` Miaoqing Pan
2025-06-05 10:17 ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-05 10:54 ` Baochen Qiang
2025-06-06 0:52 ` Miaoqing Pan
2025-06-06 2:02 ` Baochen Qiang
2025-06-06 7:43 ` Miaoqing Pan
2025-06-25 2:06 ` Baochen Qiang
2025-06-25 9:34 ` Johan Hovold
2025-05-26 11:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] wifi: ath11k: use plain access for descriptor length Johan Hovold
2025-05-26 11:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] wifi: ath11k: use plain accesses for monitor descriptor Johan Hovold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=026b710f-b50f-4302-ad4f-36932c2558ff@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_miaoqing@quicinc.com \
--cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=jjohnson@kernel.org \
--cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®