mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] bpf: Cancel special fields on rhashtab value recycle instead of freeing
@ 2026-08-24 10:35 Muhammad Falak R Wani
  2026-08-24 11:32 ` bot+bpf-ci
  2026-08-24 15:51 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Muhammad Falak R Wani @ 2026-08-24 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko,
	Eduard Zingerman, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Martin KaFai Lau,
	Song Liu, Yonghong Song, Jiri Olsa, Emil Tsalapatis,
	Ihor Solodrai, Shuah Khan, Mykyta Yatsenko, bpf, linux-kernel,
	linux-kselftest
  Cc: Muhammad Falak R Wani

Commit a3a81d2476512 ("bpf: Cancel special fields on map value recycle")
changed array and hashtab update/delete paths to avoid full special-field
destruction while recycling a map value. Such paths can run in NMI
context for tracing programs, where referenced kptr destructors are not
generally safe. Instead, bpf_obj_cancel_fields() cancels the NMI-safe
timer, workqueue, and task_work fields and leaves referenced kptr cleanup
to a later safe destruction path.

Resizable hashtable special-field support was added four days earlier by
commit 6905f8601298e ("bpf: Allow special fields in resizable hashtab"),
but its equivalent paths were not converted. BPF_MAP_TYPE_RHASH permits
referenced kptr fields and can be used by perf-event programs, which may
run in NMI context. rhtab_map_update_existing() and rhtab_delete_elem()
therefore still call bpf_obj_free_fields() directly and may invoke a
referenced kptr destructor from NMI context.

bpf_disable_instrumentation() around the rhashtable operations only
prevents a nested instrumentation program from reentering a bucket lock.
It does not change the execution context of the current program and
therefore does not make a subsequent destructor call NMI-safe.

Use bpf_obj_cancel_fields() in both paths, matching array and hashtab.
On delete, the allocator destructor performs full cleanup after the RCU
grace periods. On an in-place update, the kptr remains attached to the
map value until a BPF program explicitly removes it or the element is
later freed, matching the array-map semantics promised when rhashtable
special-field support was introduced.

Extend the map kptr lifetime test with an rhashtable variant. It stashes
a referenced kptr, updates the ordinary fields of the existing value,
and verifies that the update does not release the reference.

Fixes: 6905f8601298e ("bpf: Allow special fields in resizable hashtab")
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Falak R Wani <falakreyaz@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c                          | 26 ++++++++-----------
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c       | 11 ++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr.c  | 12 +++++++++
 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
index d40cb5dd446ca..a395928a3cf20 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
@@ -2864,16 +2864,6 @@ static int rhtab_map_alloc_check(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	return htab_map_alloc_check(attr);
 }
 
-static void rhtab_check_and_free_fields(struct bpf_rhtab *rhtab,
-					struct rhtab_elem *elem)
-{
-	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rhtab->map.record))
-		return;
-
-	bpf_obj_free_fields(rhtab->map.record,
-			    rhtab_elem_value(elem, rhtab->map.key_size));
-}
-
 static void rhtab_mem_dtor(void *obj, void *ctx)
 {
 	struct htab_btf_record *hrec = ctx;
@@ -2963,8 +2953,12 @@ static int rhtab_delete_elem(struct bpf_rhtab *rhtab, struct rhtab_elem *elem, v
 		rhtab_read_elem_value(&rhtab->map, copy, elem, flags);
 		check_and_init_map_value(&rhtab->map, copy);
 	}
-	/* Release internal structs: kptr, bpf_timer, task_work, wq */
-	rhtab_check_and_free_fields(rhtab, elem);
+	/*
+	 * Cancel timer, workqueue, and task_work fields before deferring the
+	 * element free. Referenced kptr destruction is not NMI-safe, so leave
+	 * it for rhtab_mem_dtor() after the RCU grace periods.
+	 */
+	bpf_obj_cancel_fields(&rhtab->map, rhtab_elem_value(elem, rhtab->map.key_size));
 	bpf_mem_cache_free_rcu(&rhtab->ma, elem);
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -3022,10 +3016,12 @@ static long rhtab_map_update_existing(struct bpf_map *map, struct rhtab_elem *el
 	 * BPF_F_LOCK, matching arraymap semantics.
 	 *
 	 * copy_map_value() skips special-field offsets, so old timers/
-	 * kptrs/etc. still sit in the slot. Cancel them after the copy
-	 * to match arraymap's update semantics.
+	 * kptrs/etc. still sit in the slot. This path may run in NMI context,
+	 * so only cancel timer/workqueue/task_work here. Keep kptr fields
+	 * attached to the value, matching arraymap semantics; referenced
+	 * kptrs are destroyed when the element is eventually freed.
 	 */
-	rhtab_check_and_free_fields(rhtab, elem);
+	bpf_obj_cancel_fields(&rhtab->map, old_val);
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c
index 17e707dddda8d..9fddf03387bb8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c
@@ -98,6 +98,12 @@ static void test_map_kptr_success(bool test_run)
 	ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_kptr_ref3 refcount");
 	ASSERT_OK(opts.retval, "test_map_kptr_ref3 retval");
 
+	ret = bpf_map__delete_elem(skel->maps.rhash_map, &key, sizeof(key), 0);
+	ASSERT_OK(ret, "rhash_map delete");
+	ret = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_map_kptr_ref3), &opts);
+	ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_kptr_ref3 refcount");
+	ASSERT_OK(opts.retval, "test_map_kptr_ref3 retval");
+
 	ret = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_ls_map_kptr_ref_del), &lopts);
 	ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_ls_map_kptr_ref_del delete");
 	skel->data->ref--;
@@ -147,6 +153,7 @@ enum map_update_kptr_case {
 	MAP_UPDATE_KPTR_ARRAY,
 	MAP_UPDATE_KPTR_HASH,
 	MAP_UPDATE_KPTR_HASH_MALLOC,
+	MAP_UPDATE_KPTR_RHASH,
 };
 
 static struct bpf_program *map_update_kptr_prog(struct map_kptr *skel,
@@ -159,6 +166,8 @@ static struct bpf_program *map_update_kptr_prog(struct map_kptr *skel,
 		return skel->progs.test_hash_map_update_kptr;
 	case MAP_UPDATE_KPTR_HASH_MALLOC:
 		return skel->progs.test_hash_malloc_map_update_kptr;
+	case MAP_UPDATE_KPTR_RHASH:
+		return skel->progs.test_rhash_map_update_kptr;
 	}
 
 	return NULL;
@@ -204,6 +213,8 @@ void serial_test_map_kptr(void)
 		test_map_update_kptr(MAP_UPDATE_KPTR_HASH);
 	if (test__start_subtest("update_hash_malloc_map_kptr"))
 		test_map_update_kptr(MAP_UPDATE_KPTR_HASH_MALLOC);
+	if (test__start_subtest("update_rhash_map_kptr"))
+		test_map_update_kptr(MAP_UPDATE_KPTR_RHASH);
 
 	skel = rcu_tasks_trace_gp__open_and_load();
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "rcu_tasks_trace_gp__open_and_load"))
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr.c
index 0d87c97dac991..44210dd3c0ec9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr.c
@@ -57,6 +57,14 @@ struct hash_malloc_map {
 	__uint(map_flags, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
 } hash_malloc_map SEC(".maps");
 
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_RHASH);
+	__type(key, int);
+	__type(value, struct map_value);
+	__uint(max_entries, 1);
+	__uint(map_flags, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
+} rhash_map SEC(".maps");
+
 struct pcpu_hash_malloc_map {
 	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH);
 	__type(key, int);
@@ -421,6 +429,7 @@ int test_map_kptr_ref1(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
 	bpf_map_update_elem(&hash_map, &key, &val, 0);
 	bpf_map_update_elem(&hash_malloc_map, &key, &val, 0);
 	bpf_map_update_elem(&lru_hash_map, &key, &val, 0);
+	bpf_map_update_elem(&rhash_map, &key, &val, 0);
 
 	bpf_map_update_elem(&pcpu_hash_map, &key, &val, 0);
 	bpf_map_update_elem(&pcpu_hash_malloc_map, &key, &val, 0);
@@ -430,6 +439,7 @@ int test_map_kptr_ref1(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
 	TEST(hash_map);
 	TEST(hash_malloc_map);
 	TEST(lru_hash_map);
+	TEST(rhash_map);
 
 	TEST_PCPU(pcpu_array_map);
 	TEST_PCPU(pcpu_hash_map);
@@ -468,6 +478,7 @@ int test_map_kptr_ref2(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
 	TEST(hash_map);
 	TEST(hash_malloc_map);
 	TEST(lru_hash_map);
+	TEST(rhash_map);
 
 	TEST_PCPU(pcpu_array_map);
 	TEST_PCPU(pcpu_hash_map);
@@ -599,6 +610,7 @@ int name(void *ctx)						\
 
 DEFINE_HASH_UPDATE_KPTR_TEST(test_hash_map_update_kptr, hash_map)
 DEFINE_HASH_UPDATE_KPTR_TEST(test_hash_malloc_map_update_kptr, hash_malloc_map)
+DEFINE_HASH_UPDATE_KPTR_TEST(test_rhash_map_update_kptr, rhash_map)
 
 SEC("syscall")
 int test_ls_map_kptr_ref1(void *ctx)
-- 
2.55.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] bpf: Cancel special fields on rhashtab value recycle instead of freeing
  2026-08-24 10:35 [PATCH] bpf: Cancel special fields on rhashtab value recycle instead of freeing Muhammad Falak R Wani
@ 2026-08-24 11:32 ` bot+bpf-ci
  2026-08-24 15:51 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: bot+bpf-ci @ 2026-08-24 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: falakreyaz, ast, daniel, andrii, eddyz87, memxor, martin.lau,
	song, yonghong.song, jolsa, emil, ihor.solodrai, shuah, yatsenko,
	bpf, linux-kernel, linux-kselftest
  Cc: falakreyaz, ast, andrii, daniel, martin.lau, eddyz87,
	yonghong.song, clm, ihor.solodrai

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5360 bytes --]

> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> index d40cb5dd446c..a395928a3cf2 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> @@ -2864,16 +2864,6 @@ static int rhtab_map_alloc_check(union bpf_attr *attr)
>  	return htab_map_alloc_check(attr);
>  }
>
> -static void rhtab_check_and_free_fields(struct bpf_rhtab *rhtab,
> -					struct rhtab_elem *elem)
> -{
> -	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rhtab->map.record))
> -		return;
> -
> -	bpf_obj_free_fields(rhtab->map.record,
> -			    rhtab_elem_value(elem, rhtab->map.key_size));
> -}
> -
>  static void rhtab_mem_dtor(void *obj, void *ctx)
>  {
>  	struct htab_btf_record *hrec = ctx;

> @@ -2963,8 +2953,12 @@ static int rhtab_delete_elem(struct bpf_rhtab *rhtab, struct rhtab_elem *elem, v
>  		rhtab_read_elem_value(&rhtab->map, copy, elem, flags);
>  		check_and_init_map_value(&rhtab->map, copy);
>  	}
> -	/* Release internal structs: kptr, bpf_timer, task_work, wq */
> -	rhtab_check_and_free_fields(rhtab, elem);
> +	/*
> +	 * Cancel timer, workqueue, and task_work fields before deferring the
> +	 * element free. Referenced kptr destruction is not NMI-safe, so leave
> +	 * it for rhtab_mem_dtor() after the RCU grace periods.
> +	 */
> +	bpf_obj_cancel_fields(&rhtab->map, rhtab_elem_value(elem, rhtab->map.key_size));
>  	bpf_mem_cache_free_rcu(&rhtab->ma, elem);
>  	return 0;
>  }

Is the deferred referenced kptr release on this path guaranteed to happen?

bpf_mem_cache_free_rcu() only queues the element.  rhtab_mem_dtor() is
reached only through free_all(), which is the sole caller of c->dtor:

kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:free_all() {
	llist_for_each_safe(pos, t, llnode) {
		if (c->dtor)
			c->dtor((void *)pos + LLIST_NODE_SZ, c->dtor_ctx);
		free_one(pos, percpu);
		cnt++;
	}
}

But alloc_bulk() can pull the element back out of the pending-free lists
before free_all() ever sees it, and it recycles the object directly:

kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:alloc_bulk() {
	for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
		...
		obj = llist_del_first(&c->free_by_rcu_ttrace);
		if (!obj)
			break;
		add_obj_to_free_list(c, obj);
	}
	...
	for (; i < cnt; i++) {
		obj = llist_del_first(&c->waiting_for_gp_ttrace);
		if (!obj)
			break;
		add_obj_to_free_list(c, obj);
	}
	...
}

Since bpf_obj_cancel_fields() leaves the BPF_KPTR_REF field populated, does
that element go back onto c->free_llist still holding a live reference, with
rhtab_mem_dtor() never running for it?

The next allocation then reuses it in rhtab_map_update_elem():

kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:rhtab_map_update_elem() {
	...
	elem = bpf_mem_cache_alloc(&rhtab->ma);
	if (!elem)
		return -ENOMEM;

	memcpy(elem->data, key, map->key_size);
	copy_map_value(map, rhtab_elem_value(elem, map->key_size), value);
	check_and_init_map_value(map, rhtab_elem_value(elem, map->key_size));
	...
}

check_and_init_map_value() -> bpf_obj_init_field() memsets the kptr slot to
zero, so can the old pointer be dropped without the reference ever being
released?  That would leak the pointee (a task_struct or cgroup reference,
for example) on any delete-then-insert workload on an RHASH map with a
__kptr field.

For comparison, the array and hashtab conversion in a3a81d247651 does not
have this window: htab's non-prealloc allocation path never re-initialises
the value, so a recycled element inherits the old kptr instead of having it
zeroed.

Would one of these work instead?

  - release referenced kptrs in rhtab_delete_elem() when not in NMI
    context, since the value is already unlinked from the rhashtable and
    unreachable to other CPUs
  - drop the check_and_init_map_value() call in rhtab_map_update_elem() for
    reused elements, so the recycled element inherits the old kptr the way
    alloc_htab_elem() does
  - defer the kptr release to a context that is guaranteed to run before
    the element can be reused, rather than to the allocator destructor

> [ ... ]

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c
> index 17e707dddda8..9fddf03387bb 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c
> @@ -98,6 +98,12 @@ static void test_map_kptr_success(bool test_run)
>  	ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_kptr_ref3 refcount");
>  	ASSERT_OK(opts.retval, "test_map_kptr_ref3 retval");
>
> +	ret = bpf_map__delete_elem(skel->maps.rhash_map, &key, sizeof(key), 0);
> +	ASSERT_OK(ret, "rhash_map delete");
> +	ret = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_map_kptr_ref3), &opts);
> +	ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_kptr_ref3 refcount");
> +	ASSERT_OK(opts.retval, "test_map_kptr_ref3 retval");
> +

This new delete on rhash_map, combined with the
bpf_map_update_elem(&rhash_map, ...) added to test_map_kptr_ref1(), looks
like the delete-then-insert sequence described above.

> [ ... ]

Also, the commit message states:

>     On delete, the allocator destructor performs full cleanup after the RCU
>     grace periods.

Does this hold for elements that alloc_bulk() reclaims out of
c->free_by_rcu_ttrace or c->waiting_for_gp_ttrace before free_all() runs?


---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md

CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/32718933772

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] bpf: Cancel special fields on rhashtab value recycle instead of freeing
  2026-08-24 10:35 [PATCH] bpf: Cancel special fields on rhashtab value recycle instead of freeing Muhammad Falak R Wani
  2026-08-24 11:32 ` bot+bpf-ci
@ 2026-08-24 15:51 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
  2026-08-25  3:00   ` Muhammad Falak Reyaz
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mykyta Yatsenko @ 2026-08-24 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Muhammad Falak R Wani, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Eduard Zingerman, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi,
	Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, Jiri Olsa,
	Emil Tsalapatis, Ihor Solodrai, Shuah Khan, Mykyta Yatsenko, bpf,
	linux-kernel, linux-kselftest

On 8/24/26 11:35 AM, Muhammad Falak R Wani wrote:
> Commit a3a81d2476512 ("bpf: Cancel special fields on map value recycle")
> changed array and hashtab update/delete paths to avoid full special-field
> destruction while recycling a map value. Such paths can run in NMI
> context for tracing programs, where referenced kptr destructors are not
> generally safe. Instead, bpf_obj_cancel_fields() cancels the NMI-safe
> timer, workqueue, and task_work fields and leaves referenced kptr cleanup
> to a later safe destruction path.
> 
> Resizable hashtable special-field support was added four days earlier by
> commit 6905f8601298e ("bpf: Allow special fields in resizable hashtab"),
> but its equivalent paths were not converted. BPF_MAP_TYPE_RHASH permits
> referenced kptr fields and can be used by perf-event programs, which may
> run in NMI context. rhtab_map_update_existing() and rhtab_delete_elem()
> therefore still call bpf_obj_free_fields() directly and may invoke a
> referenced kptr destructor from NMI context.
> 
> bpf_disable_instrumentation() around the rhashtable operations only
> prevents a nested instrumentation program from reentering a bucket lock.
> It does not change the execution context of the current program and
> therefore does not make a subsequent destructor call NMI-safe.
> 
> Use bpf_obj_cancel_fields() in both paths, matching array and hashtab.
> On delete, the allocator destructor performs full cleanup after the RCU
> grace periods. On an in-place update, the kptr remains attached to the
> map value until a BPF program explicitly removes it or the element is
> later freed, matching the array-map semantics promised when rhashtable
> special-field support was introduced.
> 
> Extend the map kptr lifetime test with an rhashtable variant. It stashes
> a referenced kptr, updates the ordinary fields of the existing value,
> and verifies that the update does not release the reference.
> 
> Fixes: 6905f8601298e ("bpf: Allow special fields in resizable hashtab")
> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Falak R Wani <falakreyaz@gmail.com>
> ---

It looks like Yuan is already on v2 of the same bug:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260824143621.2098856-1-chenyuan_fl@163.com/

I suggest we review those patches, instead of creating new.

>  kernel/bpf/hashtab.c                          | 26 ++++++++-----------
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c       | 11 ++++++++
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr.c  | 12 +++++++++
>  3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> index d40cb5dd446ca..a395928a3cf20 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> @@ -2864,16 +2864,6 @@ static int rhtab_map_alloc_check(union bpf_attr *attr)
>  	return htab_map_alloc_check(attr);
>  }
>  
> -static void rhtab_check_and_free_fields(struct bpf_rhtab *rhtab,
> -					struct rhtab_elem *elem)
> -{
> -	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rhtab->map.record))
> -		return;
> -
> -	bpf_obj_free_fields(rhtab->map.record,
> -			    rhtab_elem_value(elem, rhtab->map.key_size));
> -}
> -
>  static void rhtab_mem_dtor(void *obj, void *ctx)
>  {
>  	struct htab_btf_record *hrec = ctx;
> @@ -2963,8 +2953,12 @@ static int rhtab_delete_elem(struct bpf_rhtab *rhtab, struct rhtab_elem *elem, v
>  		rhtab_read_elem_value(&rhtab->map, copy, elem, flags);
>  		check_and_init_map_value(&rhtab->map, copy);
>  	}
> -	/* Release internal structs: kptr, bpf_timer, task_work, wq */
> -	rhtab_check_and_free_fields(rhtab, elem);
> +	/*
> +	 * Cancel timer, workqueue, and task_work fields before deferring the
> +	 * element free. Referenced kptr destruction is not NMI-safe, so leave
> +	 * it for rhtab_mem_dtor() after the RCU grace periods.
> +	 */
> +	bpf_obj_cancel_fields(&rhtab->map, rhtab_elem_value(elem, rhtab->map.key_size));
>  	bpf_mem_cache_free_rcu(&rhtab->ma, elem);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -3022,10 +3016,12 @@ static long rhtab_map_update_existing(struct bpf_map *map, struct rhtab_elem *el
>  	 * BPF_F_LOCK, matching arraymap semantics.
>  	 *
>  	 * copy_map_value() skips special-field offsets, so old timers/
> -	 * kptrs/etc. still sit in the slot. Cancel them after the copy
> -	 * to match arraymap's update semantics.
> +	 * kptrs/etc. still sit in the slot. This path may run in NMI context,
> +	 * so only cancel timer/workqueue/task_work here. Keep kptr fields
> +	 * attached to the value, matching arraymap semantics; referenced
> +	 * kptrs are destroyed when the element is eventually freed.
>  	 */
> -	rhtab_check_and_free_fields(rhtab, elem);
> +	bpf_obj_cancel_fields(&rhtab->map, old_val);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c
> index 17e707dddda8d..9fddf03387bb8 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c
> @@ -98,6 +98,12 @@ static void test_map_kptr_success(bool test_run)
>  	ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_kptr_ref3 refcount");
>  	ASSERT_OK(opts.retval, "test_map_kptr_ref3 retval");
>  
> +	ret = bpf_map__delete_elem(skel->maps.rhash_map, &key, sizeof(key), 0);
> +	ASSERT_OK(ret, "rhash_map delete");
> +	ret = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_map_kptr_ref3), &opts);
> +	ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_kptr_ref3 refcount");
> +	ASSERT_OK(opts.retval, "test_map_kptr_ref3 retval");
> +
>  	ret = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_ls_map_kptr_ref_del), &lopts);
>  	ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_ls_map_kptr_ref_del delete");
>  	skel->data->ref--;
> @@ -147,6 +153,7 @@ enum map_update_kptr_case {
>  	MAP_UPDATE_KPTR_ARRAY,
>  	MAP_UPDATE_KPTR_HASH,
>  	MAP_UPDATE_KPTR_HASH_MALLOC,
> +	MAP_UPDATE_KPTR_RHASH,
>  };
>  
>  static struct bpf_program *map_update_kptr_prog(struct map_kptr *skel,
> @@ -159,6 +166,8 @@ static struct bpf_program *map_update_kptr_prog(struct map_kptr *skel,
>  		return skel->progs.test_hash_map_update_kptr;
>  	case MAP_UPDATE_KPTR_HASH_MALLOC:
>  		return skel->progs.test_hash_malloc_map_update_kptr;
> +	case MAP_UPDATE_KPTR_RHASH:
> +		return skel->progs.test_rhash_map_update_kptr;
>  	}
>  
>  	return NULL;
> @@ -204,6 +213,8 @@ void serial_test_map_kptr(void)
>  		test_map_update_kptr(MAP_UPDATE_KPTR_HASH);
>  	if (test__start_subtest("update_hash_malloc_map_kptr"))
>  		test_map_update_kptr(MAP_UPDATE_KPTR_HASH_MALLOC);
> +	if (test__start_subtest("update_rhash_map_kptr"))
> +		test_map_update_kptr(MAP_UPDATE_KPTR_RHASH);
>  
>  	skel = rcu_tasks_trace_gp__open_and_load();
>  	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "rcu_tasks_trace_gp__open_and_load"))
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr.c
> index 0d87c97dac991..44210dd3c0ec9 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr.c
> @@ -57,6 +57,14 @@ struct hash_malloc_map {
>  	__uint(map_flags, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
>  } hash_malloc_map SEC(".maps");
>  
> +struct {
> +	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_RHASH);
> +	__type(key, int);
> +	__type(value, struct map_value);
> +	__uint(max_entries, 1);
> +	__uint(map_flags, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
> +} rhash_map SEC(".maps");
> +
>  struct pcpu_hash_malloc_map {
>  	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH);
>  	__type(key, int);
> @@ -421,6 +429,7 @@ int test_map_kptr_ref1(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
>  	bpf_map_update_elem(&hash_map, &key, &val, 0);
>  	bpf_map_update_elem(&hash_malloc_map, &key, &val, 0);
>  	bpf_map_update_elem(&lru_hash_map, &key, &val, 0);
> +	bpf_map_update_elem(&rhash_map, &key, &val, 0);
>  
>  	bpf_map_update_elem(&pcpu_hash_map, &key, &val, 0);
>  	bpf_map_update_elem(&pcpu_hash_malloc_map, &key, &val, 0);
> @@ -430,6 +439,7 @@ int test_map_kptr_ref1(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
>  	TEST(hash_map);
>  	TEST(hash_malloc_map);
>  	TEST(lru_hash_map);
> +	TEST(rhash_map);
>  
>  	TEST_PCPU(pcpu_array_map);
>  	TEST_PCPU(pcpu_hash_map);
> @@ -468,6 +478,7 @@ int test_map_kptr_ref2(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
>  	TEST(hash_map);
>  	TEST(hash_malloc_map);
>  	TEST(lru_hash_map);
> +	TEST(rhash_map);
>  
>  	TEST_PCPU(pcpu_array_map);
>  	TEST_PCPU(pcpu_hash_map);
> @@ -599,6 +610,7 @@ int name(void *ctx)						\
>  
>  DEFINE_HASH_UPDATE_KPTR_TEST(test_hash_map_update_kptr, hash_map)
>  DEFINE_HASH_UPDATE_KPTR_TEST(test_hash_malloc_map_update_kptr, hash_malloc_map)
> +DEFINE_HASH_UPDATE_KPTR_TEST(test_rhash_map_update_kptr, rhash_map)
>  
>  SEC("syscall")
>  int test_ls_map_kptr_ref1(void *ctx)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] bpf: Cancel special fields on rhashtab value recycle instead of freeing
  2026-08-24 15:51 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
@ 2026-08-25  3:00   ` Muhammad Falak Reyaz
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Muhammad Falak Reyaz @ 2026-08-25  3:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mykyta Yatsenko
  Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko,
	Eduard Zingerman, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Martin KaFai Lau,
	Song Liu, Yonghong Song, Jiri Olsa, Emil Tsalapatis,
	Ihor Solodrai, Shuah Khan, Mykyta Yatsenko, bpf, linux-kernel,
	linux-kselftest

On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 9:21 PM Mykyta Yatsenko
<mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com> wrote:

> I suggest we review those patches, instead of creating new.
>

Sure, Thanks Mykyta.

Humbly,
-mfrw

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-25  3:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-24 10:35 [PATCH] bpf: Cancel special fields on rhashtab value recycle instead of freeing Muhammad Falak R Wani
2026-08-24 11:32 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-24 15:51 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-08-25  3:00   ` Muhammad Falak Reyaz

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®