From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,fs,dax: mark dax_iomap_pmd_fault as const
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 13:38:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <03239288-0aff-98b7-e176-4954ecc6359c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170227203349.3318733-1-arnd@arndb.de>
On 02/27/2017 01:33 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The two alternative implementations of dax_iomap_fault have different
> prototypes, and one of them is obviously wrong as seen from this build
> warning:
>
> fs/dax.c: In function 'dax_iomap_fault':
> fs/dax.c:1462:35: error: passing argument 2 of 'dax_iomap_pmd_fault' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers]
>
> This marks the argument 'const' as in all the related functions.
>
> Fixes: a2d581675d48 ("mm,fs,dax: change ->pmd_fault to ->huge_fault")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Thanks Arnd. I posted the same fix this morning. :)
http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=148821429608976&w=2
> ---
> fs/dax.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> index d5712f42a2e6..85479428518f 100644
> --- a/fs/dax.c
> +++ b/fs/dax.c
> @@ -1436,7 +1436,7 @@ static int dax_iomap_pmd_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf,
> return result;
> }
> #else
> -static int dax_iomap_pmd_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct iomap_ops *ops)
> +static int dax_iomap_pmd_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf, const struct iomap_ops *ops)
> {
> return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK;
> }
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-27 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-27 20:33 Arnd Bergmann
2017-02-27 20:38 ` Dave Jiang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=03239288-0aff-98b7-e176-4954ecc6359c@intel.com \
--to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mawilcox@microsoft.com \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome