mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: "'Christoph Hellwig'" <hch@lst.de>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, "'Jan Kara'" <jack@suse.cz>,
	"'Jens Axboe'" <axboe@fb.com>,
	"'LKML'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Regression caused by using node_to_bdi()
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 20:27:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <041101d076ae$5c56e4d0$1504ae70$@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150413173257.GA14616@lst.de>

Hi, Christoph

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 'Christoph Hellwig' [mailto:hch@lst.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 1:33 AM
> To: Zhao Lei
> Cc: 'Christoph Hellwig'; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; 'Jan Kara'; 'Jens Axboe';
> 'LKML'
> Subject: Re: Regression caused by using node_to_bdi()
> 
> Tejun posted a series last week that moves node_to_bdi back inline to -fsdevel.
> 
> Can you apply patches 1-18 of the series
> 
> "[PATCHSET 1/3 v3 block/for-4.1/core] writeback: cgroup writeback support"
> 
> and see if that helps your benchmark?
I done performance test for this patchset(1~18).

But the result is not changed, performace is not increased:

v3.19-rc1              : io_speed: valcnt=10 avg=214.688 range=[211.460,216.190] diff=  2.24% stdev=1.417 cv=0.66%
v3.19                  : io_speed: valcnt=10 avg=212.529 range=[206.160,216.980] diff=  5.25% stdev=3.588 cv=1.69%

# This is 3 patch before
v3.19_04754_1b30e6     : io_speed: valcnt=10 avg=214.072 range=[210.690,217.440] diff=  3.20% stdev=2.222 cv=1.04%
v3.19_04765_495a27     : io_speed: valcnt=10 avg=210.163 range=[205.130,215.630] diff=  5.12% stdev=3.140 cv=1.49%
v3.19_04766_26ff13     : io_speed: valcnt=10 avg=210.045 range=[207.590,212.550] diff=  2.39% stdev=1.860 cv=0.89%

# This is patch of using node_to_bdi()
v3.19_04767_de1414     : io_speed: valcnt=10 avg=205.216 range=[202.870,206.620] diff=  1.85% stdev=0.977 cv=0.48%

# This is 3 patch after
v3.19_04768_b83ae6     : io_speed: valcnt=10 avg=205.265 range=[203.720,206.170] diff=  1.20% stdev=0.721 cv=0.35%
v3.19_04769_e4d275     : io_speed: valcnt=10 avg=205.787 range=[205.250,206.150] diff=  0.44% stdev=0.306 cv=0.15%
v3.19_04770_7b14a2     : io_speed: valcnt=10 avg=203.558 range=[203.110,204.020] diff=  0.45% stdev=0.308 cv=0.15%

v4.0-rc1               : io_speed: valcnt=10 avg=204.917 range=[203.370,205.890] diff=  1.24% stdev=0.663 cv=0.32%

# This is 1~18 of above patchset on top of v4.0-rc1
v4.0-rc1_00018_579465  : io_speed: valcnt=10 avg=205.348 range=[204.430,206.120] diff=  0.83% stdev=0.572 cv=0.28%

v4.0                   : io_speed: valcnt=10 avg=205.442 range=[204.680,207.290] diff=  1.28% stdev=0.831 cv=0.40%

(Above performance data is changed with my first mail,
because the old harddisk was broken, then I replaced to a
new one and run all performance test again)

Thanks
Zhaolei



  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-14 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-10 11:25 Zhao Lei
2015-04-12 11:33 ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-04-12 14:39   ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-04-13  1:20     ` Zhao Lei
2015-04-13  7:00     ` Zhao Lei
2015-04-13 10:22     ` Zhao Lei
2015-04-13 12:31       ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-04-14 12:14         ` Zhao Lei
2015-04-13 12:21   ` Jan Kara
2015-04-13 12:44     ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-04-13 17:32 ` 'Christoph Hellwig'
2015-04-14 12:27   ` Zhao Lei [this message]
     [not found] <003f01d057c6$eb48c3e0$c1da4ba0$@cn.fujitsu.com>
     [not found] ` <20150308102916.GD3743@quack.suse.cz>
     [not found]   ` <20150308153423.GA24154@lst.de>
2015-04-01  9:56     ` Zhao Lei
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-03-06  4:37 Zhao Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='041101d076ae$5c56e4d0$1504ae70$@cn.fujitsu.com' \
    --to=zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome