* list suggestion!
@ 2003-03-12 5:57 David Shirley
2003-03-12 8:11 ` John Bradford
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Shirley @ 2003-03-12 5:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi All,
No doubt you have all noticed that there is quite a lot of
traffic on the linux-kernel ML.
I had an idea. Why dont you split the list into a 2.4 list and a 2.5 list?
If this has already been suggested please dont hurt me :P
Cheers
Dave
/-----------------------------------
David Shirley
System's Administrator
Computer Science - Curtin University
(08) 9266 2986
-----------------------------------/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: list suggestion!
2003-03-12 5:57 list suggestion! David Shirley
@ 2003-03-12 8:11 ` John Bradford
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: John Bradford @ 2003-03-12 8:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Shirley; +Cc: linux-kernel
> No doubt you have all noticed that there is quite a lot of
> traffic on the linux-kernel ML.
>
> I had an idea. Why dont you split the list into a 2.4 list and a 2.5 list?
>
> If this has already been suggested please dont hurt me :P
It's suggested about once every two months :-)
Seriously, the main problems with doing that are that:
* Most developers would end up subscribing to both lists anyway
* Some issues are common to both trees and would be posted to both
lists, creating even more traffic.
John.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-03-12 7:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-12 5:57 list suggestion! David Shirley
2003-03-12 8:11 ` John Bradford
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®