* RE:2.5 and DRM/3D infrastructure?
@ 2002-08-11 1:50 Hell.Surfers
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Hell.Surfers @ 2002-08-11 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: _deepfire, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 196 bytes --]
Couldn't support be in user space? The kernel doesnt even come with a bootloader, and 3d is more xfree86 ish...
On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 16:20:54 +0400 "Samium Gromoff" <_deepfire@mail.ru> wrote:
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2429 bytes --]
From: "Samium Gromoff" <_deepfire@mail.ru>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 2.5 and DRM/3D infrastructure?
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 16:20:54 +0400
Message-ID: <E17dVEk-000HFm-00@f19.mail.ru>
Regarding the list of planned changes for 2.5 i found that
nothing is announced regarding DRI/DRM infrastructure.
So i wonder whether the current situation is enough satisfactory,
or is it just that nobody is interested in such kind of developement?
Anyhow the current situation looks a bit odd, because we
basically have support for a quite narrow diapasone of 3D
accelerators.
Does it look like the current interface could be not enough mature?
(Note: this message is intended to catalyse
a fruitful
discussion. hint, hint...)
---
cheers,
Samium Gromoff__________________
________________
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-08-11 1:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-08-11 1:50 RE:2.5 and DRM/3D infrastructure? Hell.Surfers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®