* what happened to RELATIME?
@ 2007-12-03 20:16 Joakim Tjernlund
2007-12-03 21:34 ` Mark Fasheh
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2007-12-03 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Looking in 2.6.23 sources it seems like only ocfs2 has added
support for RELATIME. Was RELATIME a bad idea or is there
some other reason other filesystems hasn't added support?
Jocke
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: what happened to RELATIME?
2007-12-03 20:16 what happened to RELATIME? Joakim Tjernlund
@ 2007-12-03 21:34 ` Mark Fasheh
2007-12-03 23:46 ` Joakim Tjernlund
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Fasheh @ 2007-12-03 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joakim Tjernlund; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:16:15PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Looking in 2.6.23 sources it seems like only ocfs2 has added
> support for RELATIME. Was RELATIME a bad idea or is there
> some other reason other filesystems hasn't added support?
Ocfs2 just needs a bit of explicit support - as far as I recall, other file
systems should have gotten it automagically via the generic vfs changes.
--Mark
--
Mark Fasheh
Senior Software Developer, Oracle
mark.fasheh@oracle.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* RE: what happened to RELATIME?
2007-12-03 21:34 ` Mark Fasheh
@ 2007-12-03 23:46 ` Joakim Tjernlund
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Tjernlund @ 2007-12-03 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Mark Fasheh'; +Cc: linux-kernel
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Fasheh [mailto:mark.fasheh@oracle.com]
> Sent: den 3 december 2007 22:34
> To: Joakim Tjernlund
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: what happened to RELATIME?
>
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:16:15PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Looking in 2.6.23 sources it seems like only ocfs2 has added
> > support for RELATIME. Was RELATIME a bad idea or is there
> > some other reason other filesystems hasn't added support?
>
> Ocfs2 just needs a bit of explicit support - as far as I
> recall, other file
> systems should have gotten it automagically via the generic
> vfs changes.
> --Mark
Ahh, that explains it. Can anyone confirm that all in
FS:es honours relatime?
Thanks, Jocke
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-12-03 23:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-12-03 20:16 what happened to RELATIME? Joakim Tjernlund
2007-12-03 21:34 ` Mark Fasheh
2007-12-03 23:46 ` Joakim Tjernlund
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®