mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>,
	Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Lazily allocate memslot rmaps
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 09:40:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <05848766-b13c-2a58-81da-0f1e839a6cd0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210506184241.618958-1-bgardon@google.com>

On 06.05.21 20:42, Ben Gardon wrote:
> This series enables KVM to save memory when using the TDP MMU by waiting
> to allocate memslot rmaps until they are needed. To do this, KVM tracks
> whether or not a shadow root has been allocated. In order to get away
> with not allocating the rmaps, KVM must also be sure to skip operations
> which iterate over the rmaps. If the TDP MMU is in use and we have not
> allocated a shadow root, these operations would essentially be op-ops
> anyway. Skipping the rmap operations has a secondary benefit of avoiding
> acquiring the MMU lock in write mode in many cases, substantially
> reducing MMU lock contention.
> 
> This series was tested on an Intel Skylake machine. With the TDP MMU off
> and on, this introduced no new failures on kvm-unit-tests or KVM selftests.
> 

Happy to see this change pop up, I remember discussing this with Paolo 
recently.

Another step to reduce the rmap overhead could be looking into using a 
dynamic datastructure to manage the rmap, instead of allocating a 
fixed-sized array. That could also significantly reduce memory overhead 
in some setups and give us more flexibility, for example, for resizing 
or splitting slots atomically.

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb


      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-07  7:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-06 18:42 Ben Gardon
2021-05-06 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Deduplicate rmap freeing Ben Gardon
2021-05-07  7:42   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-06 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out allocating memslot rmap Ben Gardon
2021-05-07  7:46   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-10 16:29     ` Ben Gardon
2021-05-06 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] KVM: mmu: Refactor memslot copy Ben Gardon
2021-05-07  7:48   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-06 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] KVM: mmu: Add slots_arch_lock for memslot arch fields Ben Gardon
2021-05-06 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Add a field to control memslot rmap allocation Ben Gardon
2021-05-06 23:44   ` Ben Gardon
2021-05-07  7:50     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-07  8:28     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-10 16:14       ` Ben Gardon
2021-05-10 16:33         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-10 16:37           ` Ben Gardon
2021-05-06 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Skip rmap operations if rmaps not allocated Ben Gardon
2021-05-06 23:07   ` kernel test robot
2021-05-06 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Protect rmaps independently with SRCU Ben Gardon
2021-05-06 23:58   ` kernel test robot
2021-05-07  0:56   ` kernel test robot
2021-05-07  8:42   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-10 17:45     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-10 17:53       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-10 18:28         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-11 16:22           ` Ben Gardon
2021-05-11 16:45             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-06 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Lazily allocate memslot rmaps Ben Gardon
2021-05-07  1:10   ` kernel test robot
2021-05-07  8:28   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-07  7:40 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=05848766-b13c-2a58-81da-0f1e839a6cd0@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=pshier@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
    --cc=yulei.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhukeqian1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®