From: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com>,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 7/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Protect rmaps independently with SRCU
Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 11:42:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210506184241.618958-8-bgardon@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210506184241.618958-1-bgardon@google.com>
In preparation for lazily allocating the rmaps when the TDP MMU is in
use, protect the rmaps with SRCU. Unfortunately, this requires
propagating a pointer to struct kvm around to several functions.
Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 6 ++---
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 730ea84bf7e7..48067c572c02 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -927,13 +927,18 @@ static void pte_list_remove(struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head, u64 *sptep)
__pte_list_remove(sptep, rmap_head);
}
-static struct kvm_rmap_head *__gfn_to_rmap(gfn_t gfn, int level,
+static struct kvm_rmap_head *__gfn_to_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
+ int level,
struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
{
+ struct kvm_rmap_head *head;
unsigned long idx;
idx = gfn_to_index(gfn, slot->base_gfn, level);
- return &slot->arch.rmap[level - PG_LEVEL_4K][idx];
+ head = srcu_dereference_check(slot->arch.rmap[level - PG_LEVEL_4K],
+ &kvm->srcu,
+ lockdep_is_held(&kvm->slots_arch_lock));
+ return &head[idx];
}
static struct kvm_rmap_head *gfn_to_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
@@ -944,7 +949,7 @@ static struct kvm_rmap_head *gfn_to_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
slots = kvm_memslots_for_spte_role(kvm, sp->role);
slot = __gfn_to_memslot(slots, gfn);
- return __gfn_to_rmap(gfn, sp->role.level, slot);
+ return __gfn_to_rmap(kvm, gfn, sp->role.level, slot);
}
static bool rmap_can_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -1194,7 +1199,8 @@ static void kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm,
return;
while (mask) {
- rmap_head = __gfn_to_rmap(slot->base_gfn + gfn_offset + __ffs(mask),
+ rmap_head = __gfn_to_rmap(kvm,
+ slot->base_gfn + gfn_offset + __ffs(mask),
PG_LEVEL_4K, slot);
__rmap_write_protect(kvm, rmap_head, false);
@@ -1227,7 +1233,8 @@ static void kvm_mmu_clear_dirty_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm,
return;
while (mask) {
- rmap_head = __gfn_to_rmap(slot->base_gfn + gfn_offset + __ffs(mask),
+ rmap_head = __gfn_to_rmap(kvm,
+ slot->base_gfn + gfn_offset + __ffs(mask),
PG_LEVEL_4K, slot);
__rmap_clear_dirty(kvm, rmap_head, slot);
@@ -1270,7 +1277,7 @@ bool kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
if (kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(kvm)) {
for (i = PG_LEVEL_4K; i <= KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; ++i) {
- rmap_head = __gfn_to_rmap(gfn, i, slot);
+ rmap_head = __gfn_to_rmap(kvm, gfn, i, slot);
write_protected |= __rmap_write_protect(kvm, rmap_head,
true);
}
@@ -1373,17 +1380,19 @@ struct slot_rmap_walk_iterator {
};
static void
-rmap_walk_init_level(struct slot_rmap_walk_iterator *iterator, int level)
+rmap_walk_init_level(struct kvm *kvm, struct slot_rmap_walk_iterator *iterator,
+ int level)
{
iterator->level = level;
iterator->gfn = iterator->start_gfn;
- iterator->rmap = __gfn_to_rmap(iterator->gfn, level, iterator->slot);
- iterator->end_rmap = __gfn_to_rmap(iterator->end_gfn, level,
+ iterator->rmap = __gfn_to_rmap(kvm, iterator->gfn, level,
+ iterator->slot);
+ iterator->end_rmap = __gfn_to_rmap(kvm, iterator->end_gfn, level,
iterator->slot);
}
static void
-slot_rmap_walk_init(struct slot_rmap_walk_iterator *iterator,
+slot_rmap_walk_init(struct kvm *kvm, struct slot_rmap_walk_iterator *iterator,
struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, int start_level,
int end_level, gfn_t start_gfn, gfn_t end_gfn)
{
@@ -1393,7 +1402,7 @@ slot_rmap_walk_init(struct slot_rmap_walk_iterator *iterator,
iterator->start_gfn = start_gfn;
iterator->end_gfn = end_gfn;
- rmap_walk_init_level(iterator, iterator->start_level);
+ rmap_walk_init_level(kvm, iterator, iterator->start_level);
}
static bool slot_rmap_walk_okay(struct slot_rmap_walk_iterator *iterator)
@@ -1401,7 +1410,8 @@ static bool slot_rmap_walk_okay(struct slot_rmap_walk_iterator *iterator)
return !!iterator->rmap;
}
-static void slot_rmap_walk_next(struct slot_rmap_walk_iterator *iterator)
+static void slot_rmap_walk_next(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct slot_rmap_walk_iterator *iterator)
{
if (++iterator->rmap <= iterator->end_rmap) {
iterator->gfn += (1UL << KVM_HPAGE_GFN_SHIFT(iterator->level));
@@ -1413,15 +1423,15 @@ static void slot_rmap_walk_next(struct slot_rmap_walk_iterator *iterator)
return;
}
- rmap_walk_init_level(iterator, iterator->level);
+ rmap_walk_init_level(kvm, iterator, iterator->level);
}
-#define for_each_slot_rmap_range(_slot_, _start_level_, _end_level_, \
- _start_gfn, _end_gfn, _iter_) \
- for (slot_rmap_walk_init(_iter_, _slot_, _start_level_, \
- _end_level_, _start_gfn, _end_gfn); \
- slot_rmap_walk_okay(_iter_); \
- slot_rmap_walk_next(_iter_))
+#define for_each_slot_rmap_range(_kvm_, _slot_, _start_level_, _end_level_, \
+ _start_gfn, _end_gfn, _iter_) \
+ for (slot_rmap_walk_init(_kvm_, _iter_, _slot_, _start_level_, \
+ _end_level_, _start_gfn, _end_gfn); \
+ slot_rmap_walk_okay(_iter_); \
+ slot_rmap_walk_next(_kvm_, _iter_))
typedef bool (*rmap_handler_t)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
@@ -1434,8 +1444,9 @@ static __always_inline bool kvm_handle_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm,
struct slot_rmap_walk_iterator iterator;
bool ret = false;
- for_each_slot_rmap_range(range->slot, PG_LEVEL_4K, KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL,
- range->start, range->end - 1, &iterator)
+ for_each_slot_rmap_range(kvm, range->slot, PG_LEVEL_4K,
+ KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL, range->start,
+ range->end - 1, &iterator)
ret |= handler(kvm, iterator.rmap, range->slot, iterator.gfn,
iterator.level, range->pte);
@@ -5233,8 +5244,8 @@ slot_handle_level_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
{
struct slot_rmap_walk_iterator iterator;
- for_each_slot_rmap_range(memslot, start_level, end_level, start_gfn,
- end_gfn, &iterator) {
+ for_each_slot_rmap_range(kvm, memslot, start_level, end_level,
+ start_gfn, end_gfn, &iterator) {
if (iterator.rmap)
flush |= fn(kvm, iterator.rmap, memslot);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index d7a40ce342cc..1098ab73a704 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -10854,9 +10854,9 @@ static int alloc_memslot_rmap(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
lpages = gfn_to_index(slot->base_gfn + npages - 1,
slot->base_gfn, level) + 1;
- slot->arch.rmap[i] =
- kvcalloc(lpages, sizeof(*slot->arch.rmap[i]),
- GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
+ rcu_assign_pointer(slot->arch.rmap[i],
+ kvcalloc(lpages, sizeof(*slot->arch.rmap[i]),
+ GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT));
if (!slot->arch.rmap[i])
goto out_free;
}
--
2.31.1.607.g51e8a6a459-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-06 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-06 18:42 [PATCH v3 0/8] Lazily allocate memslot rmaps Ben Gardon
2021-05-06 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Deduplicate rmap freeing Ben Gardon
2021-05-07 7:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-06 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out allocating memslot rmap Ben Gardon
2021-05-07 7:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-10 16:29 ` Ben Gardon
2021-05-06 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] KVM: mmu: Refactor memslot copy Ben Gardon
2021-05-07 7:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-06 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] KVM: mmu: Add slots_arch_lock for memslot arch fields Ben Gardon
2021-05-06 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Add a field to control memslot rmap allocation Ben Gardon
2021-05-06 23:44 ` Ben Gardon
2021-05-07 7:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-07 8:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-10 16:14 ` Ben Gardon
2021-05-10 16:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-10 16:37 ` Ben Gardon
2021-05-06 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Skip rmap operations if rmaps not allocated Ben Gardon
2021-05-06 23:07 ` kernel test robot
2021-05-06 18:42 ` Ben Gardon [this message]
2021-05-06 23:58 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Protect rmaps independently with SRCU kernel test robot
2021-05-07 0:56 ` kernel test robot
2021-05-07 8:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-10 17:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-10 17:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-10 18:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-11 16:22 ` Ben Gardon
2021-05-11 16:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-06 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Lazily allocate memslot rmaps Ben Gardon
2021-05-07 1:10 ` kernel test robot
2021-05-07 8:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-07 7:40 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] " David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210506184241.618958-8-bgardon@google.com \
--to=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
--cc=yulei.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=zhukeqian1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®