From: "Mario Limonciello (AMD) (kernel.org)" <superm1@kernel.org>
To: Antheas Kapenekakis <lkml@antheas.dev>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 0/2] platform/x86/amd: Add AMD DPTCi driver for TDP control in devices without vendor-specific controls
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2026 13:51:01 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <061b13d9-2415-46e0-8671-26ce0f608c8e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGwozwGTPKH5Lc4pEzmrNd7YhHJpZHod=YhViYVVcJTVbLX9ug@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/3/2026 1:16 PM, Antheas Kapenekakis wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2026 at 19:59, Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> A high level question - why aren't these vendors implementing PMF? It's
>> 1000% less work to enable PMF. All the values that match the design get
>> stored in BIOS, driver pulls the information and uses it.
>
> From my understanding they do not implement anything and just use
> ryzenadj with their windows vendor software.
>
>> Same approach for Windows and Linux.
>>
>> More comments below.
>>
>> On 3/3/26 12:17 PM, Antheas Kapenekakis wrote:
>>> Many AMD-based handheld PCs (GPD, AYANEO, OneXPlayer, AOKZOE, OrangePi)
>>> ship with the AGESA ALIB method at \_SB.ALIB, which accepts Function 0x0C
>>> (the Dynamic Power and Thermal Configuration Interface, DPTCi). This
>>> allows software to adjust APU power and thermal parameters at runtime:
>>> STAPM limit, fast/slow PPT limits, skin-temperature TDP limit, slow/STAPM
>>> time constants, and the thermal control target.
>>>
>>> Until now userspace has reached this interface through the acpi_call out-
>>> of-tree module or ryzenadj, which carry no ABI guarantees and no per-device
>>> safety limits. This driver replaces that with a proper in-kernel
>>> implementation that:
>>>
>>> * Exposes all seven parameters through the firmware-attributes sysfs ABI,
>>> so that standard tools (fwupd, systemd-bios-vendor, etc.) can enumerate
>>
>> What is systemd-bios-vendor? I guess I'm not familiar with this and a
>> quick web search didn't turn anything obvious up.
>
> I used some AI assistance to compile this from my userspace
> implementation and the ASEGA pdf from the AMD site. I need to go
> through _everything_ before this moves to non-RFC. Same with
> copyright year. I focused on the implementation doing the things I
> want it to do for now.
Got it; so it's a made up tool :P
>
>>> and modify them without device-specific knowledge.
>>>
>>> * Enforces tiered per-device and per-SoC limits. The default "device"
>>> mode restricts writes to a curated safe range (smin..smax) derived from
>>> the device's thermal design.
>>
>> Can you please elaborate where you got all these numbers from? I don't
>> know if they're accurate or not. Someone would probably need to cross
>> reference them to be sure.
>
> Trial and error, research, references from Windows, etc. All of the
> devices in this driver have been tested with a userspace
> implementation using the same limits for ppt/sppt/fppt. Nobody has
> complained about them. To be honest, I usually do not set tctl slow
> and fast time limits, so those are referenced from the Legion Go and
> for tctl I go lower than what manufacturers usually set. Users like
> tctl because some of them like their device to stay cooler.
>
> The big idea for this driver is to allow locking /dev/mem and ACPI.
> Other than the legion go fan curves, and the Zotac Zone driver which
> needs a cleanup, everything else is handled in the kernel now.
>
> But this approach works fine for the Zotac Zone as they seem to be
> using a very simple WMI shim.
I mean at a high level I conceptually like the idea of getting rid of
the need to use software that manipulates /dev/mem and especially
anything that means people relying on out of tree patches.
This is a strong balancing act though to ratify interfaces to things
that we don't have a stable ABI contract and documentation of the
implications on getting it wrong.
>
>>> An "expanded" mode exposes the full
>>> hardware-validated range. An optional CONFIG_AMD_DPTC_EXTENDED Kconfig
>>> adds "soc" (raw ALIB_PARAMS envelope) and "unbound" tiers for advanced
>>> use. The active tier is itself a firmware-attribute, switchable at
>>> runtime.
>>>
>>> * Stages values and commits them atomically in a single ALIB call,
>>> matching the protocol's intended bulk-update semantics. A save_settings
>>> attribute (per firmware-attributes ABI) controls whether writes commit
>>> immediately ("single" mode) or are held until an explicit "save".
>>>
>>> * When in "single" mode, re-applies staged values after system resume,
>>> so suspend/resume cycles do not silently revert to firmware defaults.
>>
>> This isn't the only interface for setting power limits. How do you make
>> sure that the EC for example isn't stepping on toes on these designs?
>
> For the DMI matched devices it is not. For the ones that are not
> matched, the driver does not autoload and needs a kconfig parameter to
> even load.
>
> OneXPlayer is a bit more complex with their turbo button doing TDP
> swaps but turbo takeover in oxpec takes care of that and then you are
> supposed use ryzenadj.
>
>> I /guess/ it always will need to be opt-in a device by device basis.
>>
>> What happens if the vendor enables PMF in a BIOS update? How does this
>> avoid conflicts?
>
> Some manufacturers enable pmf without implementing the tables. From my
> understanding none of them implement pmf with limits. If a
> manufacturer wants to move to pmf, we can amend the DMI entry with a
> bios match. However, from my understanding, there is no TDP slider
> equivalent for PMF.
>
>>>
>>> Device limits are supplied for GPD Win Mini / Win 4 / Win 5 / Win Max 2 /
>>> Duo / Pocket 4, OrangePi NEO-01, AOKZOE A1/A2, OneXPlayer F1/2/X1/G1,
>>> and numerous AYANEO models. The SoC table covers Ryzen 5000, 6000, 7040,
>>> 8000, Z1, AI 9 HX 370, and the Ryzen AI MAX series.
>>>
>>> Tested on a GPD Win 5 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395). Confirmed with ryzenadj -i
>>> that committed values are applied to hardware, and that fast/slow PPT
>>> limits are honoured under a full-CPU stress load.
>>>
>>> @Mario: can you suggest a CC list for V2? Thanks. Even if not merged, this
>>> driver is still good for downstream use.
>>
>> You should include Shyam (AMD), Denis and Derek (community).
>
> Sure.
>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Usage
>>> -----
>>>
>>> List all exposed attributes (read-only, no root required):
>>>
>>> $ fwupdmgr get-bios-settings
>>>
>>> This enumerates every attribute under /sys/class/firmware-attributes/,
>>> including current_value, default_value, min_value, max_value, and
>>> display_name for each DPTCi parameter.
>>
>> AFAIK - fwupd doesn't understand "save_settings" today
>
> Yes, I do not expect it to even allow writing, but at least you can
> preview the values which is useful. And from what I saw defaults are
> not shown either.
>
> Antheas
>
>>>
>>> Sysfs direct usage
>>> ------------------
>>>
>>> All paths are under:
>>>
>>> ATTR=/sys/class/firmware-attributes/amd_dptc/attributes
>>>
>>> Inspect a parameter (no root needed):
>>>
>>> $ cat $ATTR/stapm_limit/{display_name,min_value,max_value,default_value,current_value}
>>> Sustained TDP (mW)
>>> 4000
>>> 85000
>>> 25000
>>> <- empty: nothing staged yet
>>>
>>> Stage values (held in memory, not yet sent to firmware):
>>>
>>> $ echo 25000 | sudo tee $ATTR/stapm_limit/current_value
>>> $ echo 40000 | sudo tee $ATTR/fast_limit/current_value
>>> $ echo 27000 | sudo tee $ATTR/slow_limit/current_value
>>> $ echo 25000 | sudo tee $ATTR/skin_limit/current_value
>>> $ echo 85 | sudo tee $ATTR/temp_target/current_value
>>>
>>> Commit all staged values in one ALIB call:
>>>
>>> $ echo save | sudo tee $ATTR/save_settings
>>>
>>> Switch to auto-commit (each write commits immediately):
>>>
>>> $ echo single | sudo tee $ATTR/save_settings
>>>
>>> Return to bulk mode:
>>>
>>> $ echo bulk | sudo tee $ATTR/save_settings
>>>
>>> Clear a staged value without committing:
>>>
>>> $ echo | sudo tee $ATTR/stapm_limit/current_value
>>>
>>> Query or change the active limit tier (device/expanded/soc/unbound):
>>>
>>> $ cat $ATTR/limit_mode/possible_values
>>> device;expanded;soc;unbound
>>> $ echo expanded | sudo tee $ATTR/limit_mode/current_value
>>>
>>> Switching tiers clears all staged values (old values may fall outside the
>>> new range). Stages and commits must be redone after a mode switch.
>>>
>>> Antheas Kapenekakis (2):
>>> Documentation: firmware-attributes: generalize save_settings entry
>>> platform/x86/amd: Add AMD DPTCi driver
>>>
>>> .../testing/sysfs-class-firmware-attributes | 41 +-
>>> MAINTAINERS | 6 +
>>> drivers/platform/x86/amd/Kconfig | 27 +
>>> drivers/platform/x86/amd/Makefile | 2 +
>>> drivers/platform/x86/amd/dptc.c | 1325 +++++++++++++++++
>>> 5 files changed, 1386 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/amd/dptc.c
>>>
>>>
>>> base-commit: c89ce241c1909d2c2bdde88334c33f3000d364fb
>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-03 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-03 18:17 Antheas Kapenekakis
2026-03-03 18:17 ` [RFC v1 1/2] Documentation: firmware-attributes: generalize save_settings entry Antheas Kapenekakis
2026-03-03 18:17 ` [RFC v1 2/2] platform/x86/amd: Add AMD DPTCi driver Antheas Kapenekakis
2026-03-03 20:10 ` Mario Limonciello (AMD) (kernel.org)
2026-03-03 20:40 ` Antheas Kapenekakis
2026-03-03 20:54 ` Mario Limonciello (AMD) (kernel.org)
2026-03-03 21:20 ` Antheas Kapenekakis
2026-03-03 21:44 ` Sasha Levin
2026-03-03 22:08 ` Antheas Kapenekakis
2026-03-03 18:59 ` [RFC v1 0/2] platform/x86/amd: Add AMD DPTCi driver for TDP control in devices without vendor-specific controls Mario Limonciello
2026-03-03 19:16 ` Antheas Kapenekakis
2026-03-03 19:23 ` Antheas Kapenekakis
2026-03-03 19:27 ` Armin Wolf
2026-03-03 19:34 ` Antheas Kapenekakis
2026-03-03 21:50 ` Armin Wolf
2026-03-03 23:47 ` Antheas Kapenekakis
2026-03-03 19:51 ` Mario Limonciello (AMD) (kernel.org) [this message]
2026-03-03 20:04 ` Antheas Kapenekakis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=061b13d9-2415-46e0-8671-26ce0f608c8e@kernel.org \
--to=superm1@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@antheas.dev \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome