mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
To: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>, <andersson@kernel.org>,
	<mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: <hnagalla@ti.com>, <u-kumar1@ti.com>, <jm@ti.com>,
	<jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
	<jkangas@redhat.com>, <eballetbo@redhat.com>,
	<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/26] remoteproc: k3-m4: Use k3_rproc_mem_data structure for memory info
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 08:43:08 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0636d6a8-7de9-4887-82eb-3f5fd8a208d5@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250317120622.1746415-6-b-padhi@ti.com>

On 3/17/25 7:06 AM, Beleswar Padhi wrote:
> The ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c driver previously hardcoded device memory
> region addresses and names. Change this to use the k3_rproc_mem_data
> structure to store memory information. This aligns with DSP and R5
> drivers, and can be refactored out later.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
> ---
>   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++------
>   1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c
> index d0ee7a8d460d..e83bef7cfddf 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c
> @@ -20,9 +20,6 @@
>   #include "remoteproc_internal.h"
>   #include "ti_sci_proc.h"
>   
> -#define K3_M4_IRAM_DEV_ADDR 0x00000
> -#define K3_M4_DRAM_DEV_ADDR 0x30000
> -

So two patches ago when you did this same thing for R5, you kept the
K3_R5_TCM_DEV_ADDR define. But here you remove the adress #defines.
I don't care if you leave them or keep them, but just do the same
either way for both M4 and R5.

Andrew

>   /**
>    * struct k3_m4_rproc_mem - internal memory structure
>    * @cpu_addr: MPU virtual address of the memory region
> @@ -38,15 +35,29 @@ struct k3_m4_rproc_mem {
>   };
>   
>   /**
> - * struct k3_m4_rproc_mem_data - memory definitions for a remote processor
> + * struct k3_m4_mem_data - memory definitions for a remote processor
>    * @name: name for this memory entry
>    * @dev_addr: device address for the memory entry
>    */
> -struct k3_m4_rproc_mem_data {
> +struct k3_m4_mem_data {
>   	const char *name;
>   	const u32 dev_addr;
>   };
>   
> +/**
> + * struct k3_m4_dev_data - device data structure for a M4 core
> + * @mems: pointer to memory definitions for a M4 core
> + * @num_mems: number of memory regions in @mems
> + * @boot_align_addr: boot vector address alignment granularity
> + * @uses_lreset: flag to denote the need for local reset management
> + */
> +struct k3_m4_dev_data {
> +	const struct k3_m4_mem_data *mems;
> +	u32 num_mems;
> +	u32 boot_align_addr;
> +	bool uses_lreset;
> +};
> +
>   /**
>    * struct k3_m4_rproc - k3 remote processor driver structure
>    * @dev: cached device pointer
> @@ -56,6 +67,7 @@ struct k3_m4_rproc_mem_data {
>    * @rmem: reserved memory regions data
>    * @num_rmems: number of reserved memory regions
>    * @reset: reset control handle
> + * @data: pointer to M4-specific device data
>    * @tsp: TI-SCI processor control handle
>    * @ti_sci: TI-SCI handle
>    * @ti_sci_id: TI-SCI device identifier
> @@ -71,6 +83,7 @@ struct k3_m4_rproc {
>   	struct k3_m4_rproc_mem *rmem;
>   	int num_rmems;
>   	struct reset_control *reset;
> +	const struct k3_m4_dev_data *data;
>   	struct ti_sci_proc *tsp;
>   	const struct ti_sci_handle *ti_sci;
>   	u32 ti_sci_id;
> @@ -336,14 +349,13 @@ static void *k3_m4_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len, bool
>   static int k3_m4_rproc_of_get_memories(struct platform_device *pdev,
>   				       struct k3_m4_rproc *kproc)
>   {
> -	static const char * const mem_names[] = { "iram", "dram" };
> -	static const u32 mem_addrs[] = { K3_M4_IRAM_DEV_ADDR, K3_M4_DRAM_DEV_ADDR };
> +	const struct k3_m4_dev_data *data = kproc->data;
>   	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>   	struct resource *res;
>   	int num_mems;
>   	int i;
>   
> -	num_mems = ARRAY_SIZE(mem_names);
> +	num_mems = kproc->data->num_mems;
>   	kproc->mem = devm_kcalloc(kproc->dev, num_mems,
>   				  sizeof(*kproc->mem), GFP_KERNEL);
>   	if (!kproc->mem)
> @@ -351,17 +363,17 @@ static int k3_m4_rproc_of_get_memories(struct platform_device *pdev,
>   
>   	for (i = 0; i < num_mems; i++) {
>   		res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> -						   mem_names[i]);
> +						   data->mems[i].name);
>   		if (!res) {
>   			dev_err(dev, "found no memory resource for %s\n",
> -				mem_names[i]);
> +				data->mems[i].name);
>   			return -EINVAL;
>   		}
>   		if (!devm_request_mem_region(dev, res->start,
>   					     resource_size(res),
>   					     dev_name(dev))) {
>   			dev_err(dev, "could not request %s region for resource\n",
> -				mem_names[i]);
> +				data->mems[i].name);
>   			return -EBUSY;
>   		}
>   
> @@ -369,15 +381,15 @@ static int k3_m4_rproc_of_get_memories(struct platform_device *pdev,
>   							 resource_size(res));
>   		if (!kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr) {
>   			dev_err(dev, "failed to map %s memory\n",
> -				mem_names[i]);
> +				data->mems[i].name);
>   			return -ENOMEM;
>   		}
>   		kproc->mem[i].bus_addr = res->start;
> -		kproc->mem[i].dev_addr = mem_addrs[i];
> +		kproc->mem[i].dev_addr = data->mems[i].dev_addr;
>   		kproc->mem[i].size = resource_size(res);
>   
>   		dev_dbg(dev, "memory %8s: bus addr %pa size 0x%zx va %pK da 0x%x\n",
> -			mem_names[i], &kproc->mem[i].bus_addr,
> +			data->mems[i].name, &kproc->mem[i].bus_addr,
>   			kproc->mem[i].size, kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr,
>   			kproc->mem[i].dev_addr);
>   	}
> @@ -563,12 +575,17 @@ static int k3_m4_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   {
>   	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>   	struct k3_m4_rproc *kproc;
> +	const struct k3_m4_dev_data *data;
>   	struct rproc *rproc;
>   	const char *fw_name;
>   	bool r_state = false;
>   	bool p_state = false;
>   	int ret;
>   
> +	data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +	if (!data)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>   	ret = rproc_of_parse_firmware(dev, 0, &fw_name);
>   	if (ret)
>   		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to parse firmware-name property\n");
> @@ -583,6 +600,7 @@ static int k3_m4_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	kproc = rproc->priv;
>   	kproc->dev = dev;
>   	kproc->rproc = rproc;
> +	kproc->data = data;
>   	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rproc);
>   
>   	kproc->ti_sci = devm_ti_sci_get_by_phandle(dev, "ti,sci");
> @@ -650,8 +668,20 @@ static int k3_m4_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static const struct k3_m4_mem_data am64_m4_mems[] = {
> +	{ .name = "iram", .dev_addr = 0x0 },
> +	{ .name = "dram", .dev_addr = 0x30000 },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct k3_m4_dev_data am64_m4_data = {
> +	.mems = am64_m4_mems,
> +	.num_mems = ARRAY_SIZE(am64_m4_mems),
> +	.boot_align_addr = SZ_1K,
> +	.uses_lreset = true,
> +};
> +
>   static const struct of_device_id k3_m4_of_match[] = {
> -	{ .compatible = "ti,am64-m4fss", },
> +	{ .compatible = "ti,am64-m4fss", .data = &am64_m4_data, },
>   	{ /* sentinel */ },
>   };
>   MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, k3_m4_of_match);

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-07 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-17 12:05 [PATCH v9 00/26] Refactor TI K3 R5, DSP and M4 Remoteproc Drivers Beleswar Padhi
2025-03-17 12:05 ` [PATCH v9 01/26] remoteproc: k3-r5: Re-order internal memory initialization function Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-07 13:29   ` Andrew Davis
2025-04-08  8:14     ` Beleswar Prasad Padhi
2025-03-17 12:05 ` [PATCH v9 02/26] remoteproc: k3-r5: Refactor Data Structures to Align with DSP and M4 Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-07 13:33   ` Andrew Davis
2025-04-08  8:28     ` Beleswar Prasad Padhi
2025-03-17 12:05 ` [PATCH v9 03/26] remoteproc: k3-r5: Use k3_r5_rproc_mem_data structure for memory info Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-07 13:37   ` Andrew Davis
2025-03-17 12:06 ` [PATCH v9 04/26] remoteproc: k3-{m4/dsp}: Align internal rproc data structure with R5 Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-07 13:40   ` Andrew Davis
2025-03-17 12:06 ` [PATCH v9 05/26] remoteproc: k3-m4: Use k3_rproc_mem_data structure for memory info Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-07 13:43   ` Andrew Davis [this message]
2025-04-08  8:38     ` Beleswar Prasad Padhi
2025-03-17 12:06 ` [PATCH v9 06/26] remoteproc: k3-r5: Drop check performed in k3_r5_rproc_{mbox_callback/kick} Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-07 13:25   ` Andrew Davis
2025-03-17 12:06 ` [PATCH v9 07/26] remoteproc: k3-dsp: Drop check performed in k3_dsp_rproc_{mbox_callback/kick} Beleswar Padhi
2025-03-17 12:06 ` [PATCH v9 08/26] remoteproc: k3-r5: Refactor sequential core power up/down operations Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-07 13:45   ` Andrew Davis
2025-04-08  8:41     ` Beleswar Prasad Padhi
2025-03-17 12:06 ` [PATCH v9 09/26] remoteproc: k3: Refactor shared data structures Beleswar Padhi
2025-03-17 12:06 ` [PATCH v9 10/26] remoteproc: k3: Refactor mailbox rx_callback functions into common driver Beleswar Padhi
2025-03-17 12:06 ` [PATCH v9 11/26] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .kick rproc ops " Beleswar Padhi
2025-03-17 12:06 ` [PATCH v9 12/26] remoteproc: k3: Refactor rproc_reset() implementation " Beleswar Padhi
2025-03-17 12:06 ` [PATCH v9 13/26] remoteproc: k3: Refactor rproc_release() " Beleswar Padhi
2025-03-17 12:06 ` [PATCH v9 14/26] remoteproc: k3: Refactor rproc_request_mbox() implementations " Beleswar Padhi
2025-03-17 12:06 ` [PATCH v9 15/26] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .prepare rproc ops " Beleswar Padhi
2025-03-17 12:06 ` [PATCH v9 16/26] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .unprepare " Beleswar Padhi
2025-03-17 12:06 ` [PATCH v9 17/26] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .start " Beleswar Padhi
2025-03-17 12:06 ` [PATCH v9 18/26] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .stop " Beleswar Padhi
2025-03-17 12:06 ` [PATCH v9 19/26] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .attach " Beleswar Padhi
2025-03-17 12:06 ` [PATCH v9 20/26] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .detach " Beleswar Padhi
2025-03-17 12:06 ` [PATCH v9 21/26] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .get_loaded_rsc_table " Beleswar Padhi
2025-03-17 12:06 ` [PATCH v9 22/26] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .da_to_va rproc " Beleswar Padhi
2025-03-17 12:06 ` [PATCH v9 23/26] remoteproc: k3: Refactor of_get_memories() functions " Beleswar Padhi
2025-03-17 12:06 ` [PATCH v9 24/26] remoteproc: k3: Refactor mem_release() " Beleswar Padhi
2025-03-17 12:06 ` [PATCH v9 25/26] remoteproc: k3: Refactor reserved_mem_init() " Beleswar Padhi
2025-03-17 12:06 ` [PATCH v9 26/26] remoteproc: k3: Refactor release_tsp() " Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-07 13:04 ` [PATCH v9 00/26] Refactor TI K3 R5, DSP and M4 Remoteproc Drivers Beleswar Prasad Padhi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0636d6a8-7de9-4887-82eb-3f5fd8a208d5@ti.com \
    --to=afd@ti.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=b-padhi@ti.com \
    --cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=eballetbo@redhat.com \
    --cc=hnagalla@ti.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=jkangas@redhat.com \
    --cc=jm@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®