From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: deadline: Remove unnecessary goto label in pick_earliest_pushable_dl_task
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 22:23:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <06444675-136e-442f-918b-e7887d2c535b@wanadoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241205211632.1181715-1-jstultz@google.com>
Le 05/12/2024 à 22:16, John Stultz a écrit :
> Commit 8b5e770ed7c0 ("sched/deadline: Optimize pull_dl_task()")
> added an odd goto label that seems to be unnecssary, given its
s/unnecssary/unnecessary/
> called unconditionally from the bottom of a while loop and the
> label is at the top.
Except that it is not a while loop, but only an if.
Maybe, changing this if into a while would save a few lines of code and
be more readable as-well.
CJ
>
> Thus, clean it up and remove the label/goto.
>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
> Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
> Cc: kernel-team@android.com
> Fixes: 8b5e770ed7c0 ("sched/deadline: Optimize pull_dl_task()")
> Reported-by: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index d9d5a702f1a61..566a05efa4e57 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -2501,8 +2501,6 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_earliest_pushable_dl_task(struct rq *rq, int cpu
> return NULL;
>
> next_node = rb_first_cached(&rq->dl.pushable_dl_tasks_root);
> -
> -next_node:
> if (next_node) {
> p = __node_2_pdl(next_node);
>
> @@ -2510,7 +2508,6 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_earliest_pushable_dl_task(struct rq *rq, int cpu
> return p;
>
> next_node = rb_next(next_node);
> - goto next_node;
> }
>
> return NULL;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
To: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: deadline: Remove unnecessary goto label in pick_earliest_pushable_dl_task
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 22:23:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <06444675-136e-442f-918b-e7887d2c535b@wanadoo.fr> (raw)
Message-ID: <20241205212317.N7DHS7SMD1C7ayVocCE47I6dDaduKQatqJC-L3MtzPo@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241205211632.1181715-1-jstultz@google.com>
Le 05/12/2024 à 22:16, John Stultz a écrit :
> Commit 8b5e770ed7c0 ("sched/deadline: Optimize pull_dl_task()")
> added an odd goto label that seems to be unnecssary, given its
s/unnecssary/unnecessary/
> called unconditionally from the bottom of a while loop and the
> label is at the top.
Except that it is not a while loop, but only an if.
Maybe, changing this if into a while would save a few lines of code and
be more readable as-well.
CJ
>
> Thus, clean it up and remove the label/goto.
>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
> Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
> Cc: kernel-team@android.com
> Fixes: 8b5e770ed7c0 ("sched/deadline: Optimize pull_dl_task()")
> Reported-by: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index d9d5a702f1a61..566a05efa4e57 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -2501,8 +2501,6 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_earliest_pushable_dl_task(struct rq *rq, int cpu
> return NULL;
>
> next_node = rb_first_cached(&rq->dl.pushable_dl_tasks_root);
> -
> -next_node:
> if (next_node) {
> p = __node_2_pdl(next_node);
>
> @@ -2510,7 +2508,6 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_earliest_pushable_dl_task(struct rq *rq, int cpu
> return p;
>
> next_node = rb_next(next_node);
> - goto next_node;
> }
>
> return NULL;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-05 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-05 21:16 John Stultz
2024-12-05 21:23 ` Christophe JAILLET [this message]
2024-12-05 21:23 ` Christophe JAILLET
2024-12-05 21:47 ` John Stultz
2024-12-05 23:59 ` [PATCH v2] sched: deadline: Cleanup " John Stultz
2024-12-06 8:14 ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-12-09 11:44 ` Juri Lelli
2024-12-09 12:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-12-13 12:05 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for John Stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=06444675-136e-442f-918b-e7887d2c535b@wanadoo.fr \
--to=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tkjos@google.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®