From: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org
To: a.s.protopopov@gmail.com,ast@kernel.org,daniel@iogearbox.net,andrii@kernel.org,eddyz87@gmail.com,memxor@gmail.com,almagui@kernel.org,john.fastabend@gmail.com,qmo@kernel.org,brauner@kernel.org,kpsingh@kernel.org,yonghong.song@linux.dev,jolsa@kernel.org,emil@etsalapatis.com,ihor.solodrai@linux.dev,sashal@kernel.org,bpf@vger.kernel.org,linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: a.s.protopopov@gmail.com,ast@kernel.org,andrii@kernel.org,daniel@iogearbox.net,martin.lau@kernel.org,eddyz87@gmail.com,yonghong.song@linux.dev,mason@kernel.org,ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 15/18] resolve_btfids: Tag fmod_ret candidates as targets
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 17:42:29 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <069d59babf1ed531e1a5c1bd4ec0a943f7e8f12fc1e18f0ccc8b4edd032974a0@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109170550.141443-16-a.s.protopopov@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3005 bytes --]
> resolve_btfids: Tag fmod_ret candidates as targets
TL;DR: resolve_btfids may tag KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS kfuncs (e.g.
bpf_wq_set_callback) as fmod_ret targets; the trampoline may then clobber the
implicit argument, and the kfunc could dereference a garbage pointer.
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/main.c b/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/main.c
> --- a/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/main.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/main.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1841,6 +1888,16 @@ static int btf2btf(struct object *obj)
> }
> }
>
> + for (size_t i = 0; i < obj->fmodret_retvals.cnt; i++) {
> + const struct fmodret_retval *retval = &obj->fmodret_retvals.retvals[i];
> +
> + if (has_set_func(&ctx.fmodrets, retval->btf_id))
> + continue;
> + err = add_fmodret_retval_tags(&ctx, retval);
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
Can this loop tag a kfunc with KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS as an fmod_ret target?
The kfunc loop earlier in btf2btf() has already rewritten the BTF
prototype of such a kfunc through process_kfunc_with_implicit_args():
t = (struct btf_type *)btf__type_by_id(btf, kfunc->btf_id);
t->type = new_proto_id;
so the BTF FUNC no longer lists the implicit arguments. fmodret_collect()
ran before btf2btf() and compared only the return type
(btf_func_int_return_size()), never the argument count. The only check
here is has_set_func(&ctx.fmodrets, ...), which does not consult
ctx.kfuncs, so the same btf_id still gets "bpf_fmodret" and
"bpf_fmodret_retval:...".
bpf_wq_set_callback() looks like a concrete case. It is built with the
plugin, has an ftrace call site, and starts with a side-effect free
error return:
if (flags)
return -EINVAL;
return __bpf_async_set_callback(async, callback_fn, aux->prog);
so it would get "bpf_fmodret_retval:-22". The kernel then adds it to
BTF_KFUNC_HOOK_FMODRET, and bpf_check_attach_target() accepts
BPF_MODIFY_RETURN through btf_kfunc_is_modify_return().
The trampoline model is built from the 3-argument prototype. On x86,
__arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() runs the fmod_ret programs and then calls:
restore_regs(&prog, pos_of_slot, nr_regs, regs_off)
with nr_regs = 3 before calling the original function. rcx (aux) is
caller-saved, so __bpf_prog_enter(), the program and __bpf_prog_exit()
may have overwritten it. If the program returns 0, which the verifier
allows, bpf_wq_set_callback() dereferences a garbage aux->prog.
The same seems to apply to the other KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS kfuncs that return
int (bpf_task_work_schedule_*, bpf_list_push_*, scx_bpf_*) whenever the
analysis finds an error path for them.
Would it make sense to skip retvals whose btf_id is a kfunc with
KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS in ctx.kfuncs, or any kfunc whose prototype was
rewritten? No later commit in the series changes resolve_btfids.
---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/42662799554
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 17:05 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 00/18] Auto-detect BPF fmodret targets Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 01/18] bpf: Add BTF ID sets for fmod_ret targets Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 02/18] bpf: Add a btf_id_set8_entry helper Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 03/18] bpf: Build fmod_ret target sets from BTF decl tags Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 04/18] selftests/bpf: Declare bpf_fentry_test1 in tracing tests Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 05/18] bpf: Declare fmod_ret targets with BTF_FMODRET sets Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 06/18] selftests/bpf: Test fmod_ret BTF decl tags and attach permission Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 07/18] scripts: Add LLVM plugin infrastructure Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 08/18] bpf: Add the bpf_scan_ir LLVM plugin Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 09/18] bpf: Find fmod_ret candidates in bpf_scan_ir Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 10/18] bpf: Allow writes to private stack objects " Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 11/18] bpf: Follow PHIs " Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 12/18] bpf: Follow integer casts " Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 13/18] bpf: Check the return values of fmod_ret programs on found targets Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 14/18] bpf: Require the JIT for fmod_ret programs on found 64-bit targets Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 15/18] resolve_btfids: Tag fmod_ret candidates as targets Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:42 ` bot+bpf-ci [this message]
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 16/18] selftests/bpf: Test fmod_ret candidates found by bpf_scan_ir Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 17/18] selftests/bpf: Enable bpf_scan_ir in the config Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 18/18] bpftool: List and show fmod_ret targets Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=069d59babf1ed531e1a5c1bd4ec0a943f7e8f12fc1e18f0ccc8b4edd032974a0@mail.kernel.org \
--to=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
--cc=a.s.protopopov@gmail.com \
--cc=almagui@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=mason@kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=qmo@kernel.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®