From: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org
To: a.s.protopopov@gmail.com,ast@kernel.org,daniel@iogearbox.net,andrii@kernel.org,eddyz87@gmail.com,memxor@gmail.com,almagui@kernel.org,john.fastabend@gmail.com,qmo@kernel.org,brauner@kernel.org,kpsingh@kernel.org,yonghong.song@linux.dev,jolsa@kernel.org,emil@etsalapatis.com,ihor.solodrai@linux.dev,sashal@kernel.org,bpf@vger.kernel.org,linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: a.s.protopopov@gmail.com,ast@kernel.org,andrii@kernel.org,daniel@iogearbox.net,martin.lau@kernel.org,eddyz87@gmail.com,yonghong.song@linux.dev,mason@kernel.org,ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 13/18] bpf: Check the return values of fmod_ret programs on found targets
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 17:42:27 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1760ad16d930af8fe5c9bdcc74de2ecb3307c2ae57db0bdcead7505d5d9ff630@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109170550.141443-14-a.s.protopopov@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3043 bytes --]
> bpf: Check the return values of fmod_ret programs on found targets
TL;DR: The fmod_ret return check may wrongly reject valid programs: when
states returning two allowed constants merge at a shared exit, R0 becomes a
range, not a constant, and the load fails.
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
[ ... ]
> +/* The program must return a constant: 0 or one of the values of the tag */
> +static int check_fmodret_retval(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
> + const char *exit_ctx, const char *reg_name)
> +{
> + const struct bpf_prog_aux *aux = env->prog->aux;
> + struct bpf_reg_state *reg = reg_state(env, regno);
> + u32 i;
> +
> + if (reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE && tnum_is_const(reg->var_off) &&
> + fmodret_retval_allowed(aux, reg->var_off.value))
> + return 0;
Can this reject valid programs when two allowed constants are joined at a
shared exit?
The main pass is the fixpoint in kernel/bpf/flow.c, and flow_merge() joins
states that reach the same basic-block head. For SCALAR_VALUE, join_reg()
-> join_range() produces the union range. flow_join_makes_up() only
refuses the join when flow_gap() finds values in the union that neither
state has, and only while flow_has_room(). The FLOW_NEED_ARG table has no
entry for R0 at BPF_EXIT, so flow_needed_consts_differ() does not keep the
constants apart.
For a target tagged "bpf_fmodret_retval:-12,-11":
r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 0)
r0 = -11
if r2 == 0 goto +1
r0 = -12
exit
The states at exit (R0=-11 and R0=-12) are disjoint but leave no gap, so
they become R0=[-12,-11] and tnum_is_const() fails. The load then fails
with:
At program exit the register R0 must be a constant, it should be 0 or
one of -12,-11
even though every path returns an allowed value.
The same can happen with the common pattern "r0 = 0 ... r0 = -1; exit" when
the tag contains -1, since the 64-bit constants 0 and 0xffffffffffffffff
touch on the circle and are joined. Once a program uses half of the state
limits, flow_has_room() is false and even gapped values such as -34 and -22
are joined.
The selftest join_both_paths avoids this only by using two separate exit
instructions, and whether exits are merged is the compiler's choice.
Every other exit check so far was a range check via retval_range_within(),
but this one needs set membership. Should R0 at the main-prog exit (and R1
at bpf_throw without a callback) be added to the FLOW_NEED_ARG table for
programs with fmodret_retvals, or should a small bounded range be accepted
when every value in it is 0 or in the list?
The feature becomes reachable once 1c163e52401e ("resolve_btfids: Tag
fmod_ret candidates as targets") emits the tags, and no later commit in the
series changes this.
---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/42662799554
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 17:05 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 00/18] Auto-detect BPF fmodret targets Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 01/18] bpf: Add BTF ID sets for fmod_ret targets Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 02/18] bpf: Add a btf_id_set8_entry helper Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 03/18] bpf: Build fmod_ret target sets from BTF decl tags Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 04/18] selftests/bpf: Declare bpf_fentry_test1 in tracing tests Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 05/18] bpf: Declare fmod_ret targets with BTF_FMODRET sets Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 06/18] selftests/bpf: Test fmod_ret BTF decl tags and attach permission Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 07/18] scripts: Add LLVM plugin infrastructure Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 08/18] bpf: Add the bpf_scan_ir LLVM plugin Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 09/18] bpf: Find fmod_ret candidates in bpf_scan_ir Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 10/18] bpf: Allow writes to private stack objects " Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 11/18] bpf: Follow PHIs " Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 12/18] bpf: Follow integer casts " Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 13/18] bpf: Check the return values of fmod_ret programs on found targets Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:42 ` bot+bpf-ci [this message]
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 14/18] bpf: Require the JIT for fmod_ret programs on found 64-bit targets Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 15/18] resolve_btfids: Tag fmod_ret candidates as targets Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 16/18] selftests/bpf: Test fmod_ret candidates found by bpf_scan_ir Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 17/18] selftests/bpf: Enable bpf_scan_ir in the config Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 18/18] bpftool: List and show fmod_ret targets Anton Protopopov
2026-11-09 17:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1760ad16d930af8fe5c9bdcc74de2ecb3307c2ae57db0bdcead7505d5d9ff630@mail.kernel.org \
--to=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
--cc=a.s.protopopov@gmail.com \
--cc=almagui@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=mason@kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=qmo@kernel.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®