From: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@realtek.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
nic_swsd <nic_swsd@realtek.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net 2/3] r8152: fix remote wakeup
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 09:55:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0835B3720019904CB8F7AA43166CEEB2F3AC58@RTITMBSV03.realtek.com.tw> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1437640258.4377.6.camel@suse.com>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 1251 bytes --]
> Hi,
>
> this is most likely wrong. Usbcore does check for a device's ability to
> do remote wakeup and will block a runtime suspend if it detects that
> a remote wakeup would be required but the device cannot deliver.
> (static int autosuspend_check())
>
> So by removing the flag in the probe() method means that devices will
> suspend during operations without remote wakeup requested. Thus an
> incoming packet cannot wake them up.
>
> If you remove setting the flag on probe() you need to set it at open()
> [and reset on close()], as devices which cannot do remote wakeup must
> only be suspended when they are down.
Hi,
I don't think I understand your description clearly. My idea is that if the
device doesn't support wakeup, we don't need set " needs_remote_wakeup".
We allow the device could be suspended and couldn't be waked up by
incoming packet. The system could be waked up by other methods except
by the device.
I don't understand why I have to set it at open() and reset it at close(). And
why must the device only be suspended when it is down?
Best Regards,
Hayes
ÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-23 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-23 7:09 [PATCH net 0/3] r8152: issues fix Hayes Wang
2015-07-23 7:09 ` [PATCH net 1/3] r8152: fix the issue about U1/U2 Hayes Wang
2015-07-23 7:09 ` [PATCH net 2/3] r8152: fix remote wakeup Hayes Wang
2015-07-23 8:30 ` Oliver Neukum
2015-07-23 9:55 ` Hayes Wang [this message]
2015-07-23 10:27 ` Oliver Neukum
2015-07-23 11:30 ` Hayes Wang
2015-07-23 7:09 ` [PATCH net 3/3] r8152: don't enable napi before rx ready Hayes Wang
2015-07-24 5:54 ` [PATCH net v2 0/3] r8152: issues fix Hayes Wang
2015-07-24 5:54 ` [PATCH net v2 1/3] r8152: fix the issue about U1/U2 Hayes Wang
2015-07-24 5:54 ` [PATCH net v2 2/3] r8152: fix wakeup settings Hayes Wang
2015-07-24 5:54 ` [PATCH net v2 3/3] r8152: don't enable napi before rx ready Hayes Wang
2015-07-27 7:56 ` [PATCH net v2 0/3] r8152: issues fix David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0835B3720019904CB8F7AA43166CEEB2F3AC58@RTITMBSV03.realtek.com.tw \
--to=hayeswang@realtek.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nic_swsd@realtek.com \
--cc=oneukum@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®