From: Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@quicinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Georgi Djakov <djakov@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Odelu Kukatla <quic_okukatla@quicinc.com>,
"Mike Tipton" <mdtipton@quicinc.com>,
Vivek Aknurwar <viveka@quicinc.com>,
"Sibi Sankar" <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 3/5] dt-bindings: interconnect: Add EPSS L3 compatible for SA8775P
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 17:37:36 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <08916876-2e24-4b4d-89ad-c0a6203bffd2@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <273w3qr5wix4srdum5qmrqdzzaw3uprqhhfmmgrwycrb6wlyqf@txuxzzyjyhfk>
On 1/12/2025 3:01 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 04:14:27PM +0000, Raviteja Laggyshetty wrote:
>> Add Epoch Subsystem (EPSS) L3 interconnect provider binding on
>> SA8775P SoCs.
>
> 1. And why is this not compatible with sm8250? There was lengthy
> discussion and no outcome of it managed to get to commit msg. Really, so
> we are going to repeat everything again and you will not get any acks.
>
sa8775p is compatible with sm8250, but only difference is sa8775p has
two instances of L3 EPSS. Initial patches were posted with two
compatibles for supporting two instances.
Later there was a comment to reuse the existing and avoid growing the
compatibles in the driver.
Initially we thought to have separate generic compatible
"qcom,epss-l3-perf" for SoCs which support L3 voting through
EPSS_L3_PERF state register. But actually, it is already supported in
the driver for sm8250 and sc7280. We can reuse sm8250 or sc7280
compatible for sa8775p.
I will update the commit text with details in the next patch revision.
> You have entire commit msg to explain things but instead you repeat what
> the patch does. We can read the diff for that.
>
> 2. Binding *ALWAYS* comes before the user.
Sure, I will update the patch order to bindings, driver and dt in next
patch revision and will follow the same for future patchsets.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml
>> index 21dae0b92819..94f7f283787a 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml
>> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ properties:
>> - qcom,sm6375-cpucp-l3
>> - qcom,sm8250-epss-l3
>> - qcom,sm8350-epss-l3
>> + - qcom,sa8775p-epss-l3
>> - const: qcom,epss-l3
>
> Your driver suggests this is not really true - it is not compatible with
> qcom,epss-l3. Maybe it is, maybe not, no clue, commit explains nothing.
"qcom,epss-l3" is generic compatible introduced for EPSS H/W from sm8250
SoC. sm8250, sa8775p and sc7280 SoCs have same EPSS H/W and use
EPSS_L3_PERF register for configuring the perf level. We thought to add
generic compatible "qcom,epss-l3-perf" for configuring perf level
through EPSS_L3_PERF register.
Later, as suggested by reviewers, looks like using a different register
cannot be a reason to have different generic compatible as the EPSS H/W
is still same on all the SoCs.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-23 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-11 16:14 [V7 0/5] Add EPSS L3 provider support on SA8775P SoC Raviteja Laggyshetty
2025-01-11 16:14 ` [PATCH V7 1/5] interconnect: core: Add dynamic id allocation support Raviteja Laggyshetty
2025-01-11 20:57 ` Bjorn Andersson
2025-01-23 10:35 ` Raviteja Laggyshetty
2025-01-13 8:14 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-01-23 10:47 ` Raviteja Laggyshetty
2025-01-20 8:15 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-01-11 16:14 ` [PATCH V7 2/5] interconnect: qcom: Add multidev EPSS L3 support Raviteja Laggyshetty
2025-01-11 21:08 ` Bjorn Andersson
2025-01-23 10:40 ` Raviteja Laggyshetty
2025-01-11 16:14 ` [PATCH V7 3/5] dt-bindings: interconnect: Add EPSS L3 compatible for SA8775P Raviteja Laggyshetty
2025-01-12 9:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-01-23 12:07 ` Raviteja Laggyshetty [this message]
2025-01-11 16:14 ` [PATCH V7 4/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: add EPSS l3 interconnect provider Raviteja Laggyshetty
2025-01-11 16:14 ` [PATCH V7 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: Add CPU OPP tables to scale DDR/L3 Raviteja Laggyshetty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=08916876-2e24-4b4d-89ad-c0a6203bffd2@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_rlaggysh@quicinc.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=djakov@kernel.org \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mdtipton@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_okukatla@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_sibis@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=viveka@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®