From: Jonas Rebmann <jre@pengutronix.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] hwmon: ina238: Add label support for voltage inputs
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 09:30:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0915032e-617f-4d46-8dc7-6818af751a0e@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eaa183cc-a56f-4a33-bf01-a5279799f395@roeck-us.net>
Hi Guenter,
Thanks for the review!
On 16/07/2025 17.04, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 7/15/25 13:49, Jonas Rebmann wrote:
>> The INA family of power monitors estimate power consumption based on
>> two voltage measurements: across a shunt resistor and across the bus.
>>
>> Conveniently label them "Shunt Voltage" and "Bus Voltage".
>>
>
> Labels are supposed to show the sensor's association with the system, not
> the chip labeling. So this is a no-go. And, yes, apparently I have been too
> complacent with people (mis-)using the label attributes. That doesn't make
> it better, so don't use it as argument to support this one.
As this chip measures power based on two voltage measurements, the
measured voltage inputs must always be associated with the system in
that way, that in1 measures the voltage on a bus and in0 over a shunt
resistor on that bus.
Otherwise the Power/Energy/Charge-Measurements will be incorrect.
Do you have a suggestion on how to use the labels correctly or should I
just drop the patch for v2?
Regards,
Jonas
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Jonas Rebmann |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-17 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-15 20:48 [PATCH 0/4] ina238: Improvements and INA228 support Jonas Rebmann
2025-07-15 20:49 ` [PATCH 1/4] hwmon: ina238: Fix inconsistent whitespace Jonas Rebmann
2025-07-16 15:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-07-15 20:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] hwmon: ina238: Add label support for voltage inputs Jonas Rebmann
2025-07-16 15:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-07-17 7:30 ` Jonas Rebmann [this message]
2025-07-17 15:24 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-07-15 20:49 ` [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: Add INA228 to ina2xx devicetree bindings Jonas Rebmann
2025-07-16 6:30 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-07-15 20:49 ` [PATCH 4/4] hwmon: ina238: Add support for INA228 Jonas Rebmann
2025-07-16 15:50 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0915032e-617f-4d46-8dc7-6818af751a0e@pengutronix.de \
--to=jre@pengutronix.de \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®