From: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
To: Axel Haslam <ahaslam@baylibre.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
robh+dt@kernel.org, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Alexandre Bailon <abailon@baylibre.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFT v2 12/17] USB: ochi-da8xx: Use a regulator for vbus/overcurrent
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:53:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <09a4391e-63b6-1622-f964-4aff0ecae87c@lechnology.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKXjFTOxQ58rThpPw9t73k-BBZ8YKGvMhWfAG1r+3kC=GJVxWg@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/25/2016 03:24 AM, Axel Haslam wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:39 AM, David Lechner <david@lechnology.com> wrote:
>> On 10/24/2016 11:46 AM, ahaslam@baylibre.com wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Axel Haslam <ahaslam@baylibre.com>
>>>
>>> Currently, the da8xx ohci driver uses a set of gpios and callbacks in
>>> board files to handle vbus and overcurrent irqs form the power supply.
>>> However, this does not play nice when moving to a DT based boot were
>>> we wont have board files.
>>>
>>> Instead of requesting and handling the gpio, use the regulator framework
>>> to take care of enabling and disabling vbus power.
>>> This has the benefit
>>> that we dont need to pass any more platform data to the driver:
>>>
>>> These will be handled by the regulator framework:
>>> set_power -> regulator_enable/regulator_disable
>>> get_power -> regulator_is_enabled
>>> get_oci -> regulator_get_mode
>>> ocic_notify -> regulator notification
>>>
>>> We can keep the default potpgt and use the regulator start delay instead:
>>> potpgt -> regulator startup delay time
>>>
>>> The hawk board does not have a GPIO/OVERCURRENT gpio to control vbus,
>>> (they should not have been decleared/reserved) so, just remove those
>>> definitions from the hwk board file.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Axel Haslam <ahaslam@baylibre.com>
>>> ---
>>
>>
>>
>> How do you recover after an overcurrent event?
>>
>> I have configured a fixed-regulator using device-tree, but similar to the
>> configuration in the board files here. However, when I shorted out the VBUS
>> and caused an overcurrent event, I see nothing in the kernel log saying that
>> there was an overcurrent event and after I remove the short, the regulator
>> is never turned back on.
>>
>>
>
> You should have the patch to fix gpiolib, and you should declare the
> over current gpio on the regulator as such:
> (if the pin is enabled high you should add oc-active-high);
>
> vbus_fixed: fixed-regulator-vbus {
> compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> gpio = <&gpio 109 0>;
> oc-gpio = <&gpio 36 0>;
> regulator-boot-on;
> enable-active-high;
> regulator-name = "vbus";
> regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
> regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
> };
>
>
> Question: Do you see that the over current gpio was requested
> in debugfs/gpio? and, do you see the interrupt in /proc/interrupts?
>
> If you unplug and plug in back the usb device it should work again.
> also you can unbind and bind it should also start to work:
> something like:
>
> echo usb1 >/sys/bus/usb/drivers/usb/unbind
> echo usb1 >/sys/bus/usb/drivers/usb/bind
>
>
I have added oc-active-high and I get different results, but it is still
not quite right. When I short the VBUS, I can see that my overcurrent
gpio changes state. However, the driver does not turn of the VBUS. When
I remove the short, I get an overcurrent error in the kernel log. I
would expect this when I create the short, not when I remove it. I also
tried adding GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW to the oc-gpio, but this did not change
the behavior. In either case, the oc_gpio shows as high under normal
conditions, so perhaps there is a problem with the gpio-davinci driver
not picking up GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW from the device tree.
My regulator is basically the same. My device just uses different gpios.
vbus_reg: vbus-reg {
compatible = "regulator-fixed";
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&usb11_pins>;
gpio = <&gpio 101 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
oc-gpio = <&gpio 99 0>;
enable-active-high;
oc-active-high;
regulator-name = "vbus";
regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
}
It seems to me though that I should not have oc-active-high since under
normal conditions, the oc_gpio is high and during an overcurrent event,
the oc_gpio is low. Double-checking the behavior without oc-active-high,
I see that the vbus gpio is turned off in response to the overcurrent
event, but I don't get the overcurrent message in the kernel log.
Perhaps this is because as soon as there is an overcurrent event the
vbus turns off and the oc_gpio returns to normal before the usb driver
has a chance to poll the overcurrent state?
Also, unplugging the device and plugging it back in does nothing.
Unbinding and binding the driver does work, but that does not seem like
a very nice way to have to recover from an overcurrent event.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-25 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-24 16:46 [PATCH/RFT v2 00/17] Add DT support for ohci-da8xx ahaslam
2016-10-24 16:46 ` [PATCH/RFT v2 01/17] ARM: davinci: da8xx: add usb phy clocks ahaslam
2016-10-24 16:46 ` [PATCH/RFT v2 02/17] ARM: davinci: da8xx: Add CFGCHIP syscon platform declaration ahaslam
2016-10-25 8:10 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-10-25 9:37 ` Axel Haslam
2016-10-25 10:17 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-10-25 15:53 ` David Lechner
2016-10-26 8:56 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-10-24 16:46 ` [PATCH/RFT v2 03/17] ARM: davinci: da8xx: Add USB PHY " ahaslam
2016-10-25 9:18 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-10-25 9:37 ` Axel Haslam
2016-10-24 16:46 ` [PATCH/RFT v2 04/17] ARM: DTS: da850: Add cfgchip syscon node ahaslam
2016-10-24 16:46 ` [PATCH/RFT v2 05/17] ARM: DTS: da850: Add usb phy node ahaslam
2016-10-24 16:46 ` [PATCH/RFT v2 06/17] ARM: davinci: da8xx: Fix some redefined symbol warnings ahaslam
2016-10-25 10:03 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-10-25 12:14 ` Alexandre Bailon
2016-10-24 16:46 ` [PATCH/RFT v2 07/17] ARM: davinci: da8xx: Enable the usb20 "per" clk on phy_clk_enable ahaslam
2016-10-25 2:53 ` David Lechner
2016-10-25 10:01 ` Axel Haslam
2016-10-25 10:12 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-10-25 16:05 ` David Lechner
2016-10-26 9:30 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-10-24 16:46 ` [PATCH/RFT v2 08/17] ARM: davinci: hawk: add full constraints for ohci plat boot ahaslam
2016-10-25 10:28 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-10-25 10:31 ` Axel Haslam
2016-10-24 16:46 ` [PATCH/RFT v2 09/17] regulator: fixed: Add over current event ahaslam
2016-10-24 17:43 ` Mark Brown
2016-10-24 17:53 ` Axel Haslam
2016-10-24 17:53 ` Mark Brown
2016-10-24 18:11 ` Axel Haslam
2016-10-24 18:19 ` Mark Brown
2016-10-25 12:55 ` Axel Haslam
2016-10-25 14:33 ` Mark Brown
2016-10-25 14:57 ` Axel Haslam
2016-10-25 15:07 ` Axel Haslam
2016-10-30 20:42 ` Rob Herring
2016-10-24 16:46 ` [PATCH/RFT v2 10/17] USB: da8xx: use flag instead of bitmask for over current change ahaslam
2016-10-24 16:46 ` [PATCH/RFT v2 11/17] USB: OHCI: make ohci-da8xx a separate driver ahaslam
2016-10-25 0:38 ` David Lechner
2016-10-25 7:39 ` Axel Haslam
2016-10-25 16:12 ` David Lechner
2016-10-25 16:21 ` Axel Haslam
2016-10-25 16:24 ` David Lechner
2016-10-24 16:46 ` [PATCH/RFT v2 12/17] USB: ochi-da8xx: Use a regulator for vbus/overcurrent ahaslam
2016-10-25 1:39 ` David Lechner
2016-10-25 8:24 ` Axel Haslam
2016-10-25 16:53 ` David Lechner [this message]
2016-10-25 17:32 ` Axel Haslam
2016-10-25 10:43 ` Sekhar Nori
2016-10-25 10:52 ` Axel Haslam
2016-10-24 16:46 ` [PATCH/RFT v2 13/17] USB: da8xx: use ohci priv data instead of globals ahaslam
2016-10-25 1:12 ` David Lechner
2016-10-25 9:56 ` Axel Haslam
2016-10-24 16:46 ` [PATCH/RFT v2 14/17] ARM: davinci: register the usb20_phy clock on the DT file ahaslam
2016-10-24 16:46 ` [PATCH/RFT v2 15/17] usb: host: ohci-da8xx: Add devicetree bindings documentation ahaslam
2016-10-25 1:02 ` David Lechner
2016-10-25 9:56 ` Axel Haslam
2016-10-24 16:46 ` [PATCH/RFT v2 16/17] USB: ohci-da8xx: Allow probing from DT ahaslam
2016-10-25 0:53 ` David Lechner
2016-10-25 8:10 ` Axel Haslam
2016-10-24 16:46 ` [PATCH/RFT v2 17/17] ARM: dts: da850: add usb device node ahaslam
2016-10-25 0:48 ` David Lechner
2016-10-25 8:03 ` Axel Haslam
2016-10-25 10:55 ` [PATCH/RFT v2 00/17] Add DT support for ohci-da8xx Sekhar Nori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=09a4391e-63b6-1622-f964-4aff0ecae87c@lechnology.com \
--to=david@lechnology.com \
--cc=abailon@baylibre.com \
--cc=ahaslam@baylibre.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®