Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: ocores: replace 1ms poll iteration timeout with total transfer timeout

[Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>]

On Tue, 2025-10-07 at 14:34 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2025 at 02:09:24PM +0200, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> > When a target makes use of clock stretching, a timeout of 1ms may not be
> > enough. One extreme example is the NXP PTN3460 eDP to LVDS bridge, which
> > takes ~320ms to send its ACK after a flash command has been
> > submitted.
> > 
> > Replace the per-iteration timeout of 1ms with limiting the total
> > transfer time to the timeout set in struct i2c_adapter (defaulting to
> > 1s, configurable through the I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl). While we're at it, also
> > add a cpu_relax() to the busy poll loop.
> 
> 1s is a long time to spin. Maybe it would be better to keep with the
> current spin for 1ms, and then use one of the helpers from iopoll.h to
> do a sleeping wait? Say with 10ms sleeps, up to the 1s maximum?
> 
> 	Andrew

Makes sense. I don't think I can use something from iopoll.h directly, as i2c-
ocores has its own ioreadX abstraction to deal with different register widths
and endianesses, but a combination of spin + sleep is probably the way to go.

Best,
Matthias



-- 
TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany
Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018
Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider
https://www.tq-group.com/