From: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Bert Vermeulen <bert@biot.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andy.shevchenko@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] gpio: realtek-otto: Support reversed port layouts
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 09:55:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a48cd99805736d6a01573effa28f771fdbe9485.camel@svanheule.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYmKbHOZChSHjB-ykQCyCziwYTO_+Ai2vheo0y-vD_akA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Linus,
On Thu, 2022-04-21 at 01:01 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 9:56 PM Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net> wrote:
>
> > + if (dev_flags & GPIO_PORTS_REVERSED) {
> > + bgpio_flags = 0;
> > + ctrl->port_offset_u8 = realtek_gpio_port_offset_u8_rev;
> > + ctrl->port_offset_u16 = realtek_gpio_port_offset_u16_rev;
> > + } else {
> > + bgpio_flags = BGPIOF_BIG_ENDIAN_BYTE_ORDER;
> > + ctrl->port_offset_u8 = realtek_gpio_port_offset_u8;
> > + ctrl->port_offset_u16 = realtek_gpio_port_offset_u16;
> > + }
>
> Just checking: is this really a different silicon block, or is this
> GPIO_PORTS_REVERSED flag passed around just a way of saying:
>
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN)) ...?
The kernel for RTL930x SoC is built with CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN=y, just like the
older SoCs that were previously supported. The SoC's IRQ controller is also the
same across RTL930x/RTL839x/RTL838x, even though 32-bit registers are used
there.
On RTL838x/RTL839x the GPIO IRQ control registers have byte layout:
[H1] [L1] [H2] [L2]
[H3] [L3] [H4] [L4]
On RTL930x, the GPIO IRQ control registers are:
[H2] [L2] [H1] [L1]
[H4] [L4] [H3] [L3]
which is the reverse of:
[L1] [H1] [L2] [H2]
[L3] [H3] [L4] [H4]
Same for the GPIO registers:
On RTL83xx: [P1] [P2] [P3] [P4] (four 8b ports)
On RTL930x: [P4] [P3] [P2] [P1] (one BE32 port)
It looks like the RTL930x could use a little-endian interpretation of the 32b
registers, followed by a little-endian interpretation of the contained port
values. That would mean two reorderings for every 16b read or write operation,
and manual manipulation of the register values. Although I have to say that the
current offset calculation is not too pretty either.
We also discussed this with Andy with the original submission of the driver:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/CAHp75VdrqE0kBwzK9Jk7pZGjyfFnhatfa8UY0z-3T1w1PrbAbw@mail.gmail.com/
Best,
Sander
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-21 7:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-09 19:55 [PATCH v1 0/6] Support for RTL930x/RTL931x GPIOs Sander Vanheule
2022-04-09 19:55 ` [PATCH v1 1/6] dt-bindings: gpio: realtek-otto: Add rtl9300 compatible Sander Vanheule
2022-04-10 14:16 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-10 14:34 ` Sander Vanheule
2022-04-09 19:55 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] gpio: realtek-otto: Support reversed port layouts Sander Vanheule
2022-04-20 23:01 ` Linus Walleij
2022-04-21 7:55 ` Sander Vanheule [this message]
2022-04-22 21:14 ` Linus Walleij
2022-04-09 19:55 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] gpio: realtek-otto: Support per-cpu interrupts Sander Vanheule
2022-04-20 23:04 ` Linus Walleij
2022-04-21 9:48 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-04-22 7:04 ` Sander Vanheule
2022-04-22 20:40 ` Sander Vanheule
2022-04-09 19:55 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] gpio: realtek-otto: Add RTL930x support Sander Vanheule
2022-04-09 19:55 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] dt-bindings: gpio: realtek-otto: Add rtl9310 compatible Sander Vanheule
2022-04-10 14:16 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-09 19:55 ` [PATCH v1 6/6] gpio: realtek-otto: Add RTL931x support Sander Vanheule
2022-04-11 12:31 ` [PATCH v1 0/6] Support for RTL930x/RTL931x GPIOs Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0a48cd99805736d6a01573effa28f771fdbe9485.camel@svanheule.net \
--to=sander@svanheule.net \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=bert@biot.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®