From: Philipp Stanner <phasta@mailbox.org>
To: Qianyi Liu <liuqianyi125@gmail.com>
Cc: airlied@gmail.com, ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com,
dakr@kernel.org, daniel@ffwll.ch,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, matthew.brost@intel.com,
mripard@kernel.org, phasta@kernel.org, tzimmermann@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/scheduler: Fix mem leak when last_scheduled signaled
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 08:23:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0bb7b9c428bdefe36afb43272c73da7e04a001ed.camel@mailbox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250225031225.44102-1-liuqianyi125@gmail.com>
On Tue, 2025-02-25 at 11:12 +0800, Qianyi Liu wrote:
> Hello Philipp,
>
> Thank you for your patient reply. Let's first clarify the issue and
> send a new
> patch if necessary.
>
> As soon as it enters the drm_sched_entity_kill function, the entity
> ->last_scheduled reference count is incremented by 1. If there are
> still jobs in
> the current entity, it will enter the while loop, assuming there is
> only one job
> left. If entity->last_scheduled has already been signaled, it will
> enter
> drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb, but because null is passed in, the
> last_scheduled reference count will not be correctly reduced by 1.
>
> Because the prev pointer has been updated to &s_fence->finished, the
> dma_fence_put in the last line only reduces the reference count of
> s_fence->finished.
> The reference count of entity->last_scheduled was not reduced by
> 1, causing a memory leak.
>
> We should subtract 1 from the reference count of the prev when
> dma_fence_add_callback
> fails, which is called balance.
>
> Best Regards.
> QianYi.
OK, thanks for clarification.
I think, next to the other feedback, it would be good to have a brief
version of the above explanation in your commit message, since this
clearly describes the problem and the proposed solution.
Please address the feedback by Matt and myself in a v2.
(and btw., please don't remove the original e-mail content when
answering – that's uncommon on-list. Only when the threads are getting
huge one removes parts not addressed by the answer from the quoted
content ;)
Thanks
P.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-25 7:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-21 6:27 qianyi liu
2025-02-24 9:52 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-02-24 9:57 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-02-25 2:58 ` Qianyi Liu
2025-02-25 3:12 ` Qianyi Liu
2025-02-25 7:23 ` Philipp Stanner [this message]
2025-02-25 5:46 ` Matthew Brost
2025-02-25 8:19 ` Qianyi Liu
2025-02-25 7:18 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-02-25 13:09 ` Qianyi Liu
2025-02-25 14:00 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-25 14:05 ` Philipp Stanner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0bb7b9c428bdefe36afb43272c73da7e04a001ed.camel@mailbox.org \
--to=phasta@mailbox.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuqianyi125@gmail.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=phasta@kernel.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®