From: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
To: Srish Srinivasan <ssrish@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: maddy@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com,
christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, naveen@kernel.org,
zohar@linux.ibm.com, nayna@linux.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/pseries: Correct secvar format representation for static key management
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 19:51:00 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c0daff7b3674d2520e0fe24af4afcac49b53049.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e80c83a1-77db-452e-8a5d-d435e61bd544@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, 2025-05-07 at 21:18 +0530, Srish Srinivasan wrote:
> > We expect SB_VERSION to always be world-readable, I think? In which
> > case it shouldn't return H_AUTHORITY / -EPERM, ever, and if it does
> > that's an error which should be handled as an error. Or am I
> > misinterpreting the spec here?
>
> Yes, SB_VERSION is world-readable and should not return H_AUTHORITY
> in
> the case of dynamic key management mode. However, in
> the case of static key management mode, when SB_VERSION does not
> exist,
> the hypervisor tries to authenticate the consumer. If the
> authentication is successful, H_NOT_FOUND is returned, else
> H_AUTHORITY
> is returned. The intention behind authenticating the
> consumer when the object is not found is to ensure that a
> non-authenticated consumer is unable to conclude on the absence of
> the object. Here, when the kernel tries to read the non-existent
> SB_VERSION, it fails the authentication check and therefore,
> gets the H_AUTHORITY error code.
Ah, I see my confusion: if the object *doesn't exist*, then it
obviously can't be a world-readable object, thus triggering the
password verification. In which case, we do need to catch -EPERM.
Thanks for correcting me!
--
Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra
ajd@linux.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-12 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-30 9:03 [PATCH 0/3] Enhancements to the secvar interface in static key management mode Srish Srinivasan
2025-04-30 9:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/pseries: Correct secvar format representation for static key management Srish Srinivasan
2025-04-30 15:20 ` Nayna Jain
2025-05-05 8:36 ` Andrew Donnellan
2025-05-06 18:59 ` Srish Srinivasan
2025-05-07 6:17 ` Andrew Donnellan
2025-05-07 15:48 ` Srish Srinivasan
2025-05-12 9:51 ` Andrew Donnellan [this message]
2025-05-12 9:55 ` Andrew Donnellan
2025-05-12 10:16 ` Srish Srinivasan
2025-05-06 19:27 ` Nayna Jain
2025-05-07 6:03 ` Andrew Donnellan
2025-04-30 9:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/secvar: Expose secvars relevant to the key management mode Srish Srinivasan
2025-04-30 15:22 ` Nayna Jain
2025-05-05 7:23 ` Andrew Donnellan
2025-05-06 19:00 ` Srish Srinivasan
2025-04-30 9:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] integrity/platform_certs: Allow loading of keys in static " Srish Srinivasan
2025-04-30 15:22 ` Nayna Jain
2025-05-05 7:55 ` Andrew Donnellan
2025-05-06 19:00 ` Srish Srinivasan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0c0daff7b3674d2520e0fe24af4afcac49b53049.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=ajd@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=naveen@kernel.org \
--cc=nayna@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=ssrish@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®