From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [for-linus][PATCH 01/10] tracing: Suppress sparse warnings triggered by is_signed_type()
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 13:19:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c55a627-69e9-bd1c-8316-4c3e8366e8b8@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjqkWEr0MRO5hWuBoTDgNUj4qQK8V_Y36et=61mdPztJw@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/22/22 11:45, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 11:20 AM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> wrote:
>>
>> I agree that it's better that sparse sees the same code as what is used to
>> build the kernel. However, I do not agree that the patch above is a solution.
>> Sparse reports a warning for the suggested definition above of is_signed_type()
>> because the new definition tries to use the less-than (<) operator to compare
>> two __bitwise types.
>
> Argh. I forgot that part. It wasn't just the cast that warned, it was
> the compare too.
>
> But we did have a sparse fix for it, didn't we? That fix required that
> the '< (type)1' cast be changed to '<= (type)0' iirc, and a patch to
> sparse, but it at least avoided the problem.
Hi Linus,
I haven't seen any progress on the plan to modify sparse. Hence my attempt to
modify the is_signed_type() definition in the kernel.
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-22 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-21 0:07 [for-linus][PATCH 00/10] tracing: Fixes for 6.0 Steven Rostedt
2022-08-21 0:07 ` [for-linus][PATCH 01/10] tracing: Suppress sparse warnings triggered by is_signed_type() Steven Rostedt
2022-08-21 18:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-21 19:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-08-22 18:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-22 18:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-22 20:19 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2022-08-23 7:06 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2022-08-23 22:05 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-23 23:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-23 23:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-24 2:09 ` Al Viro
2022-08-24 2:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-24 3:10 ` Al Viro
2022-08-24 3:20 ` Al Viro
2022-08-24 5:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-24 0:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-24 1:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-24 2:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-24 3:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-24 3:46 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-24 23:28 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-25 0:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-25 0:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-25 7:57 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2022-08-25 8:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-25 17:39 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-25 18:17 ` Kees Cook
2022-08-21 0:07 ` [for-linus][PATCH 02/10] tracing: React to error return from traceprobe_parse_event_name() Steven Rostedt
2022-08-21 0:07 ` [for-linus][PATCH 03/10] tracing/perf: Fix double put of trace event when init fails Steven Rostedt
2022-08-21 0:07 ` [for-linus][PATCH 04/10] ftrace: Fix NULL pointer dereference in is_ftrace_trampoline when ftrace is dead Steven Rostedt
2022-08-21 0:07 ` [for-linus][PATCH 05/10] tracing/eprobes: Do not allow eprobes to use $stack, or % for regs Steven Rostedt
2022-08-21 0:07 ` [for-linus][PATCH 06/10] tracing/eprobes: Do not hardcode $comm as a string Steven Rostedt
2022-08-21 0:07 ` [for-linus][PATCH 07/10] tracing/eprobes: Fix reading of string fields Steven Rostedt
2022-08-21 0:07 ` [for-linus][PATCH 08/10] tracing/eprobes: Have event probes be consistent with kprobes and uprobes Steven Rostedt
2022-08-21 0:07 ` [for-linus][PATCH 09/10] tracing/probes: Have kprobes and uprobes use $COMM too Steven Rostedt
2022-08-21 0:07 ` [for-linus][PATCH 10/10] tracing: Have filter accept "common_cpu" to be consistent Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0c55a627-69e9-bd1c-8316-4c3e8366e8b8@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®