From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [for-linus][PATCH 01/10] tracing: Suppress sparse warnings triggered by is_signed_type()
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 11:17:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202208251117.F93103A00@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7bc72b9d-79b0-5b8c-18c4-4a5c914efdc5@acm.org>
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 10:39:02AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 8/24/22 17:40, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Actually, thinking about it, that was simple enough.
> >
> > -#define is_signed_type(type) (((type)(-1)) < (type)1)
> > +#define is_signed_type(type) (((type)(-1)) < (__force type)1)
> >
> > should work.
> >
> > It looks a bit odd, because we only force one side.
> >
> > But we only need to force one side, because the '-1' doesn't have any
> > issues with bitwise types, the same way 0 doesn't.
> >
> > So only '1' needs to be force-cast to avoid a warning about casting an
> > integer to a bitwise type.
> >
> > And since that -1 counts as an unrestricted value after a cast, now
> > the ordered comparison doesn't warn either.
> >
> > Now, admittedly I think sparse should also allow a forced cast of an
> > unrestricted value to be unrestricted, so I think I should do this
> >
> > static int restricted_value(struct expression *v, struct symbol *type)
> > {
> > - if (v->type == EXPR_CAST)
> > + if (v->type == EXPR_CAST || v->type = EXPR_FORCE_CAST)
> > v = v->cast_expression;
> >
> > in sparse, but even without that the above "is_signed_type()" macro
> > should make sparse happy (with that current tree of mine).
> >
> > And since we don't now need to cast 0, gcc won't complain about that
> > NULL pointer comparison.
> >
> > Does that solve things for you?
>
> Yes, thank you! No sparse warnings are triggered by the is_signed_type()
> macro and the gcc warning about ordered comparison of a pointer with the
> null pointer is gone.
>
> The patch I came up with is available below. If nobody picks it up from
> this email I will try to find an appropriate kernel maintainer to send
> this kernel patch to.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
>
>
> From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 12:59:25 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] tracing: Define the is_signed_type() macro once
>
> There are two definitions of the is_signed_type() macro: one in
> <linux/overflow.h> and a second definition in <linux/trace_events.h>.
>
> As suggested by Linus Torvalds, move the definition of the
> is_signed_type() macro into the <linux/compiler.h> header file. Change
> the definition of the is_signed_type() macro to make sure that it does
> not trigger any sparse warnings with future versions of sparse for
> bitwise types. See also:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=whjH6p+qzwUdx5SOVVHjS3WvzJQr6mDUwhEyTf6pJWzaQ@mail.gmail.com/
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wjQGnVfb4jehFR0XyZikdQvCZouE96xR_nnf5kqaM5qqQ@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Looks good to me; thanks!
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-25 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-21 0:07 [for-linus][PATCH 00/10] tracing: Fixes for 6.0 Steven Rostedt
2022-08-21 0:07 ` [for-linus][PATCH 01/10] tracing: Suppress sparse warnings triggered by is_signed_type() Steven Rostedt
2022-08-21 18:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-21 19:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-08-22 18:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-22 18:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-22 20:19 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-23 7:06 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2022-08-23 22:05 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-23 23:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-23 23:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-24 2:09 ` Al Viro
2022-08-24 2:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-24 3:10 ` Al Viro
2022-08-24 3:20 ` Al Viro
2022-08-24 5:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-24 0:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-24 1:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-24 2:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-24 3:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-24 3:46 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-24 23:28 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-25 0:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-25 0:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-25 7:57 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2022-08-25 8:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-25 17:39 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-25 18:17 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-08-21 0:07 ` [for-linus][PATCH 02/10] tracing: React to error return from traceprobe_parse_event_name() Steven Rostedt
2022-08-21 0:07 ` [for-linus][PATCH 03/10] tracing/perf: Fix double put of trace event when init fails Steven Rostedt
2022-08-21 0:07 ` [for-linus][PATCH 04/10] ftrace: Fix NULL pointer dereference in is_ftrace_trampoline when ftrace is dead Steven Rostedt
2022-08-21 0:07 ` [for-linus][PATCH 05/10] tracing/eprobes: Do not allow eprobes to use $stack, or % for regs Steven Rostedt
2022-08-21 0:07 ` [for-linus][PATCH 06/10] tracing/eprobes: Do not hardcode $comm as a string Steven Rostedt
2022-08-21 0:07 ` [for-linus][PATCH 07/10] tracing/eprobes: Fix reading of string fields Steven Rostedt
2022-08-21 0:07 ` [for-linus][PATCH 08/10] tracing/eprobes: Have event probes be consistent with kprobes and uprobes Steven Rostedt
2022-08-21 0:07 ` [for-linus][PATCH 09/10] tracing/probes: Have kprobes and uprobes use $COMM too Steven Rostedt
2022-08-21 0:07 ` [for-linus][PATCH 10/10] tracing: Have filter accept "common_cpu" to be consistent Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202208251117.F93103A00@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome