* [PATCH] drm/atmel_hlcdc: Fix uninitialized variable
@ 2024-10-04 15:08 Advait Dhamorikar
2024-10-04 19:11 ` Shuah Khan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Advait Dhamorikar @ 2024-10-04 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sam Ravnborg, Boris Brezillon, Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie, Simona Vetter, Nicolas Ferre,
Alexandre Belloni, Claudiu Beznea
Cc: dri-devel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, skhan, anupnewsmail,
Advait Dhamorikar
atmel_hlcdc_plane_update_buffers: may use an uninitialized
sr variable when the if condition remains unsatisfied
Signed-off-by: Advait Dhamorikar <advaitdhamorikar@gmail.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c
index 4a7ba0918eca..4150c4d0b4f2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c
@@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ static void atmel_hlcdc_plane_update_buffers(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
const struct atmel_hlcdc_layer_desc *desc = plane->layer.desc;
struct atmel_hlcdc_dc *dc = plane->base.dev->dev_private;
struct drm_framebuffer *fb = state->base.fb;
- u32 sr;
+ u32 sr = 0;
int i;
if (!dc->desc->is_xlcdc)
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/atmel_hlcdc: Fix uninitialized variable
2024-10-04 15:08 [PATCH] drm/atmel_hlcdc: Fix uninitialized variable Advait Dhamorikar
@ 2024-10-04 19:11 ` Shuah Khan
2024-10-07 3:13 ` Manikandan.M
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2024-10-04 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Advait Dhamorikar, Sam Ravnborg, Boris Brezillon,
Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard, Thomas Zimmermann,
David Airlie, Simona Vetter, Nicolas Ferre, Alexandre Belloni,
Claudiu Beznea
Cc: dri-devel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, anupnewsmail, Shuah Khan
On 10/4/24 09:08, Advait Dhamorikar wrote:
> atmel_hlcdc_plane_update_buffers: may use an uninitialized
> sr variable when the if condition remains unsatisfied
>
As mentioned in my response to another one of your patches,
include how you found the problem in the change log.
> Signed-off-by: Advait Dhamorikar <advaitdhamorikar@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c
> index 4a7ba0918eca..4150c4d0b4f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c
> @@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ static void atmel_hlcdc_plane_update_buffers(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
> const struct atmel_hlcdc_layer_desc *desc = plane->layer.desc;
> struct atmel_hlcdc_dc *dc = plane->base.dev->dev_private;
> struct drm_framebuffer *fb = state->base.fb;
> - u32 sr;
> + u32 sr = 0;
> int i;
>
> if (!dc->desc->is_xlcdc)
sr could be used uninitialized in the for loop, !dc->desc->is_xlcdc
case. However, is 0 the right initialization for this value?
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/atmel_hlcdc: Fix uninitialized variable
2024-10-04 19:11 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2024-10-07 3:13 ` Manikandan.M
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Manikandan.M @ 2024-10-07 3:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: skhan, advaitdhamorikar, sam, bbrezillon, maarten.lankhorst,
mripard, tzimmermann, airlied, simona, Nicolas.Ferre,
alexandre.belloni, claudiu.beznea
Cc: dri-devel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, anupnewsmail
Hi Shuah and Advait,
On 05/10/24 12:41 am, Shuah Khan wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know
> the content is safe
>
> On 10/4/24 09:08, Advait Dhamorikar wrote:
>> atmel_hlcdc_plane_update_buffers: may use an uninitialized
>> sr variable when the if condition remains unsatisfied
>>
>
> As mentioned in my response to another one of your patches,
> include how you found the problem in the change log.
>
This is smatch warning reported by Dan and Kernel Test Robot.
Kindly add the tags mentioned in the below link in the next version.
https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild/202409240320.MZPgi3Up-lkp@intel.com/
>> Signed-off-by: Advait Dhamorikar <advaitdhamorikar@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c
>> index 4a7ba0918eca..4150c4d0b4f2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c
>> @@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ static void
>> atmel_hlcdc_plane_update_buffers(struct atmel_hlcdc_plane *plane,
>> const struct atmel_hlcdc_layer_desc *desc = plane->layer.desc;
>> struct atmel_hlcdc_dc *dc = plane->base.dev->dev_private;
>> struct drm_framebuffer *fb = state->base.fb;
>> - u32 sr;
>> + u32 sr = 0;
>
>> int i;
>>
>> if (!dc->desc->is_xlcdc)
>
> sr could be used uninitialized in the for loop, !dc->desc->is_xlcdc
> case. However, is 0 the right initialization for this value?
>
initializing sr to 0 is the right way
Thank you for taking care of the same
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
--
Thanks and Regards,
Manikandan M.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-10-07 3:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-10-04 15:08 [PATCH] drm/atmel_hlcdc: Fix uninitialized variable Advait Dhamorikar
2024-10-04 19:11 ` Shuah Khan
2024-10-07 3:13 ` Manikandan.M
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®