mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tao Cui <cui.tao@linux.dev>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
Cc: cui.tao@linux.dev, maobibo@loongson.cn, gaosong@loongson.cn,
	zhaotianrui@loongson.cn, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel@xen0n.name, nagachaithanya9911@gmail.com,
	Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] LoongArch: KVM: Reject repeated PCH-PIC CTRL_INIT
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 09:15:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c8125ab-9c66-42e2-87dc-208956bd4d9d@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAhV-H5GNKZSjB_MN2Vi7uhbf1q9nqqvsfwqF+THpkwk3dEhGQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi, Huacai.

在 2026/9/29 20:43, Huacai Chen 写道:
> Hi, Tao,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 6:29 PM Tao Cui <cui.tao@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> From: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
>>
>> KVM_DEV_LOONGARCH_PCH_PIC_CTRL_INIT has no guard against repeated
>> invocation: every call overwrites pch_pic_base and registers the same
>> kvm_io_device on the MMIO bus at the new address, while
>> kvm_pch_pic_destroy() unregisters only one bus range.  After a repeated
>> init, MMIO to the stale ranges computes its register offset against the
>> new base and silently reads 0 / drops writes, and the leftover bus
>> entries persist until the VM is destroyed.
>>
>> Reject repeated initialization with -EEXIST, tracking the state with
>> a has_init flag so the check and the MMIO base update are atomic
>> under slots_lock.  The base is only committed after a successful bus
>> registration, and the real registration error is propagated instead
>> of being replaced with -EFAULT.
>>
>> Fixes: d206d9514873 ("LoongArch: KVM: Add PCHPIC user mode read and write functions")
>> Signed-off-by: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
>> ---
>>  arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_pch_pic.h |  1 +
>>  arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/pch_pic.c        | 12 ++++++++++--
>>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_pch_pic.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_pch_pic.h
>> index 887b0431fd20..679132d840e6 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_pch_pic.h
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_pch_pic.h
>> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ struct loongarch_pch_pic {
>>         spinlock_t lock;
>>         struct kvm *kvm;
>>         struct kvm_io_device device;
>> +       bool has_init;
>>         union pch_pic_id id;
>>         uint64_t mask; /* 1:disable irq, 0:enable irq */
>>         uint64_t htmsi_en; /* 1:msi */
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/pch_pic.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/pch_pic.c
>> index 7a704f18880d..a884a043feef 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/pch_pic.c
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/pch_pic.c
>> @@ -282,16 +282,24 @@ static int kvm_pch_pic_init(struct kvm_device *dev, u64 addr)
>>         struct kvm_io_device *device;
>>         struct loongarch_pch_pic *s = dev->kvm->arch.pch_pic;
> Why so complicated? The below is enough, no?
> 
Thanks for the suggestion.

I agree that a separate has_init flag can be unnecessary here. v3 uses
s->device.ops to track whether the device has already been initialized.

The other changes are kept: pch_pic_base is updated only after
successful bus registration, and the original registration error is
returned instead of -EFAULT.

Thanks,
Tao

> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/pch_pic.c
> b/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/pch_pic.c
> index 2b63b0c2c7ce..7855d78304b7 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/pch_pic.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/pch_pic.c
> @@ -281,6 +281,9 @@ static int kvm_pch_pic_init(struct kvm_device
> *dev, u64 addr)
>         struct kvm_io_device *device;
>         struct loongarch_pch_pic *s = dev->kvm->arch.pch_pic;
> 
> +       if (s->device->ops)
> +               return -EEXIST;
> +
>         s->pch_pic_base = addr;
>         device = &s->device;
>         /* init device by pch pic writing and reading ops */
> 
>>
>> -       s->pch_pic_base = addr;
>>         device = &s->device;
>>         /* init device by pch pic writing and reading ops */
>>         kvm_iodevice_init(device, &kvm_pch_pic_ops);
>>         mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
>> +       if (s->has_init) {
>> +               ret = -EEXIST;
>> +               goto out;
>> +       }
>>         /* register pch pic device */
>>         ret = kvm_io_bus_register_dev(kvm, KVM_MMIO_BUS, addr, PCH_PIC_SIZE, device);
>> +       if (!ret) {
>> +               s->pch_pic_base = addr;
>> +               s->has_init = true;
>> +       }
>> +out:
>>         mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
>>
>> -       return (ret < 0) ? -EFAULT : 0;
>> +       return ret;
>>  }
>>
>>  /* used by user space to get or set pch pic registers */
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-30  1:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-29 10:28 [PATCH v2 0/4] LoongArch: KVM: irqchip fixes Tao Cui
2026-09-29 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] LoongArch: KVM: Clear device pointer in irqchip destroy callbacks Tao Cui
2026-09-29 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] LoongArch: KVM: Load dmsintc pointer once in pch_msi_set_irq Tao Cui
2026-09-30  1:42   ` Bibo Mao
2026-09-30  2:08     ` Huacai Chen
2026-09-30  2:15       ` Bibo Mao
2026-09-29 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] LoongArch: KVM: Propagate real error code in kvm_pch_pic_create Tao Cui
2026-09-29 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] LoongArch: KVM: Reject repeated PCH-PIC CTRL_INIT Tao Cui
2026-09-29 12:43   ` Huacai Chen
2026-09-30  1:15     ` Tao Cui [this message]
2026-09-30  2:25       ` Huacai Chen
2026-09-30  1:54     ` Bibo Mao
2026-09-30  2:24       ` Huacai Chen
2026-09-30  2:34         ` Bibo Mao
2026-09-30  8:52           ` Huacai Chen
2026-09-30  9:05             ` Bibo Mao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0c8125ab-9c66-42e2-87dc-208956bd4d9d@linux.dev \
    --to=cui.tao@linux.dev \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=cuitao@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=gaosong@loongson.cn \
    --cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
    --cc=nagachaithanya9911@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhaotianrui@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®