mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>, <ohad@wizery.com>,
	<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 07/15] remoteproc/omap: Add support for DRA7xx remote processors
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 15:29:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c817542-b4b8-9dde-3efd-a7878ab19f79@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191218213152.GD16271@xps15>

On 18/12/2019 23:31, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 02:55:29PM +0200, Tero Kristo wrote:
>> From: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
>>
>> DRA7xx/AM57xx SoCs have two IPU and up to two DSP processor subsystems
>> for offloading different computation algorithms. The IPU processor
>> subsystem contains dual-core ARM Cortex-M4 processors, and is very
>> similar to those on OMAP5. The DSP processor subsystem is based on
>> the TI's standard TMS320C66x DSP CorePac core.
>>
>> Support has been added to the OMAP remoteproc driver through new
>> DRA7xx specific compatibles for properly probing and booting all
>> the different processor subsystem instances on DRA7xx/AM57xx
>> SoCs - IPU1, IPU2, DSP1 & DSP2. A build dependency with SOC_DRA7XX
>> is added to enable the driver to be built in DRA7xx-only configuration.
>>
>> The DSP boot address programming needed enhancement for DRA7xx as the
>> boot register fields are different on DRA7 compared to OMAP4 and OMAP5
>> SoCs. The register on DRA7xx contains additional fields within the
>> register and the boot address bit-field is right-shifted by 10 bits.
>> The internal memory parsing logic has also been updated to compute
>> the device addresses for the L2 RAM for DSP devices using relative
>> addressing logic, and to parse two additional RAMs at L1 level - L1P
>> and L1D. This allows the remoteproc driver to support loading into
>> these regions for a small subset of firmware images requiring as
>> such. The most common usage would be to use the L1 programmable
>> RAMs as L1 Caches.
>>
>> The firmware lookup logic also has to be adjusted for DRA7xx as
>> there are (can be) more than one instance of both the IPU and DSP
>> remote processors for the first time in OMAP4+ SoCs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
>> [t-kristo@ti.com: moved address translation quirks to pdata]
>> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig           |  2 +-
>>   drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
>> index 94afdde4bc9f..d6450d7fcf92 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
>> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ config IMX_REMOTEPROC
>>   
>>   config OMAP_REMOTEPROC
>>   	tristate "OMAP remoteproc support"
>> -	depends on ARCH_OMAP4 || SOC_OMAP5
>> +	depends on ARCH_OMAP4 || SOC_OMAP5 || SOC_DRA7XX
>>   	depends on OMAP_IOMMU
>>   	select MAILBOX
>>   	select OMAP2PLUS_MBOX
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c
>> index 3ad74c4b4071..6cf7f0a9ba9a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c
>> @@ -34,10 +34,13 @@
>>    * struct omap_rproc_boot_data - boot data structure for the DSP omap rprocs
>>    * @syscon: regmap handle for the system control configuration module
>>    * @boot_reg: boot register offset within the @syscon regmap
>> + * @boot_reg_shift: bit-field shift required for the boot address value in
>> + *		    @boot_reg
>>    */
>>   struct omap_rproc_boot_data {
>>   	struct regmap *syscon;
>>   	unsigned int boot_reg;
>> +	unsigned int boot_reg_shift;
>>   };
>>   
>>   /*
>> @@ -78,12 +81,14 @@ struct omap_rproc {
>>    * struct omap_rproc_dev_data - device data for the omap remote processor
>>    * @device_name: device name of the remote processor
>>    * @has_bootreg: true if this remote processor has boot register
>> + * @boot_reg_shift: bit shift for the boot register mask
>>    * @mem_names: memory names for this remote processor
>>    * @dev_addrs: device addresses corresponding to the memory names
>>    */
>>   struct omap_rproc_dev_data {
>>   	const char *device_name;
>>   	bool has_bootreg;
>> +	int boot_reg_shift;
>>   	const char * const *mem_names;
>>   	const u32 *dev_addrs;
>>   };
>> @@ -153,6 +158,8 @@ static int omap_rproc_write_dsp_boot_addr(struct rproc *rproc)
>>   	struct omap_rproc *oproc = rproc->priv;
>>   	struct omap_rproc_boot_data *bdata = oproc->boot_data;
>>   	u32 offset = bdata->boot_reg;
>> +	u32 value;
>> +	u32 mask;
>>   
>>   	if (rproc->bootaddr & (SZ_1K - 1)) {
>>   		dev_err(dev, "invalid boot address 0x%x, must be aligned on a 1KB boundary\n",
>> @@ -160,7 +167,10 @@ static int omap_rproc_write_dsp_boot_addr(struct rproc *rproc)
>>   		return -EINVAL;
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	regmap_write(bdata->syscon, offset, rproc->bootaddr);
>> +	value = rproc->bootaddr >> bdata->boot_reg_shift;
>> +	mask = ~(SZ_1K - 1) >> bdata->boot_reg_shift;
>> +
>> +	regmap_update_bits(bdata->syscon, offset, mask, value);
>>   
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>> @@ -286,6 +296,14 @@ static const u32 ipu_dev_addrs[] = {
>>   	0x20000000,
>>   };
>>   
>> +static const char * const dra7_dsp_mem_names[] = {
>> +	"l2ram", "l1pram", "l1dram", NULL
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const u32 dra7_dsp_dev_addrs[] = {
>> +	0x800000, 0xe00000, 0xf00000,
>> +};
>> +
>>   static const struct omap_rproc_dev_data omap4_dsp_dev_data = {
>>   	.device_name	= "dsp",
>>   	.has_bootreg	= true,
>> @@ -308,6 +326,20 @@ static const struct omap_rproc_dev_data omap5_ipu_dev_data = {
>>   	.dev_addrs	= ipu_dev_addrs,
>>   };
>>   
>> +static const struct omap_rproc_dev_data dra7_dsp_dev_data = {
>> +	.device_name	= "dsp",
>> +	.has_bootreg	= true,
> 
> Shouldn't this be solely driven from the DT?  If the "ti,bootreg" is specified
> then we can count on omap_rproc::boot_data to provide the same functionality.
> 
> 
>> +	.boot_reg_shift	= 10,
> 
> I also think this should be driven from the DT.  Otherwise some information is
> from the DT and other is hard coded in the omap_rproc_dev_data.

Hmm right I believe this is a fair point. Let me fix that for next rev.

-Tero

> 
>> +	.mem_names	= dra7_dsp_mem_names,
>> +	.dev_addrs	= dra7_dsp_dev_addrs,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct omap_rproc_dev_data dra7_ipu_dev_data = {
>> +	.device_name	= "ipu",
>> +	.mem_names	= ipu_mem_names,
>> +	.dev_addrs	= ipu_dev_addrs,
>> +};
>> +
>>   static const struct of_device_id omap_rproc_of_match[] = {
>>   	{
>>   		.compatible     = "ti,omap4-dsp",
>> @@ -325,6 +357,14 @@ static const struct of_device_id omap_rproc_of_match[] = {
>>   		.compatible     = "ti,omap5-ipu",
>>   		.data           = &omap5_ipu_dev_data,
>>   	},
>> +	{
>> +		.compatible     = "ti,dra7-dsp",
>> +		.data           = &dra7_dsp_dev_data,
>> +	},
>> +	{
>> +		.compatible     = "ti,dra7-ipu",
>> +		.data           = &dra7_ipu_dev_data,
>> +	},
>>   	{
>>   		/* end */
>>   	},
>> @@ -382,6 +422,8 @@ static int omap_rproc_get_boot_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>   		return -EINVAL;
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	oproc->boot_data->boot_reg_shift = data->boot_reg_shift;
>> +
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>
>> --

--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-19 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-13 12:55 [PATCHv3 00/15] remoteproc: updates for omap remoteproc support Tero Kristo
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 01/15] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add OMAP remoteproc bindings Tero Kristo
2019-12-20  3:38   ` Suman Anna
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 02/15] remoteproc/omap: Add device tree support Tero Kristo
2019-12-17 23:01   ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-12-19 11:54     ` Tero Kristo
2019-12-20  2:08       ` Suman Anna
2019-12-20  9:36         ` Tero Kristo
2019-12-20 18:17           ` Suman Anna
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 03/15] remoteproc/omap: Add a sanity check for DSP boot address alignment Tero Kristo
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 04/15] remoteproc/omap: Add support to parse internal memories from DT Tero Kristo
2019-12-18  0:22   ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-12-19 12:31     ` Tero Kristo
2019-12-19 17:37       ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-12-20  2:15         ` Suman Anna
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 05/15] remoteproc/omap: Add the rproc ops .da_to_va() implementation Tero Kristo
2019-12-18  0:38   ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-12-19 13:18     ` Tero Kristo
2019-12-20  0:12       ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-12-20  2:34         ` Suman Anna
2019-12-20 22:15           ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 06/15] remoteproc/omap: Initialize and assign reserved memory node Tero Kristo
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 07/15] remoteproc/omap: Add support for DRA7xx remote processors Tero Kristo
2019-12-18 21:31   ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-12-19 13:29     ` Tero Kristo [this message]
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 08/15] remoteproc/omap: Remove the unused fields from platform data Tero Kristo
2019-12-20  2:44   ` Suman Anna
2019-12-20  9:48     ` Tero Kristo
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 09/15] remoteproc/omap: Remove the omap_rproc_reserve_cma declaration Tero Kristo
2019-12-20  2:47   ` Suman Anna
2019-12-20  9:49     ` Tero Kristo
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 10/15] remoteproc/omap: Check for undefined mailbox messages Tero Kristo
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 11/15] remoteproc/omap: Request a timer(s) for remoteproc usage Tero Kristo
2019-12-18 22:43   ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-12-19 13:43     ` Tero Kristo
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 12/15] remoteproc/omap: add support for system suspend/resume Tero Kristo
2019-12-19 21:46   ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-12-20  3:11     ` Suman Anna
2019-12-20 11:04       ` Tero Kristo
2019-12-20 18:23         ` Suman Anna
2019-12-20 21:58       ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 13/15] remoteproc/omap: add support for runtime auto-suspend/resume Tero Kristo
2019-12-19 23:43   ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-12-20  3:24     ` Suman Anna
2019-12-20 11:24       ` Tero Kristo
2019-12-20 18:44         ` Suman Anna
2020-01-02 12:50           ` Tero Kristo
2019-12-20 11:08     ` Tero Kristo
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 14/15] remoteproc/omap: report device exceptions and trigger recovery Tero Kristo
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 15/15] remoteproc/omap: add watchdog functionality for remote processors Tero Kristo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0c817542-b4b8-9dde-3efd-a7878ab19f79@ti.com \
    --to=t-kristo@ti.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    --cc=s-anna@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®