mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
	<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 05/15] remoteproc/omap: Add the rproc ops .da_to_va() implementation
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 20:34:20 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd76da62-c9ad-2284-cf4b-8b0f02ed3e66@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANLsYkz=ZV-AABXq2mSdwKkcdkQgFwStepteFnMBc4j=ahe4Dw@mail.gmail.com>

On 12/19/19 6:12 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 06:18, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 18/12/2019 02:38, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 02:55:27PM +0200, Tero Kristo wrote:
>>>> From: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
>>>>
>>>> An implementation for the rproc ops .da_to_va() has been added
>>>> that provides the address translation between device addresses
>>>> to kernel virtual addresses for internal RAMs present on that
>>>> particular remote processor device. The implementation provides
>>>> the translations based on the addresses parsed and stored during
>>>> the probe.
>>>>
>>>> This ops gets invoked by the exported rproc_da_to_va() function
>>>> and allows the remoteproc core's ELF loader to be able to load
>>>> program data directly into the internal memories.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>   1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c
>>>> index 844703507a74..28f14e24b389 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c
>>>> @@ -232,10 +232,49 @@ static int omap_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
>>>>      return 0;
>>>>   }
>>>>
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * omap_rproc_da_to_va() - internal memory translation helper
>>>> + * @rproc: remote processor to apply the address translation for
>>>> + * @da: device address to translate
>>>> + * @len: length of the memory buffer
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Custom function implementing the rproc .da_to_va ops to provide address
>>>> + * translation (device address to kernel virtual address) for internal RAMs
>>>> + * present in a DSP or IPU device). The translated addresses can be used
>>>> + * either by the remoteproc core for loading, or by any rpmsg bus drivers.
>>>> + * Returns the translated virtual address in kernel memory space, or NULL
>>>> + * in failure.
>>>> + */
>>>> +static void *omap_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    struct omap_rproc *oproc = rproc->priv;
>>>> +    int i;
>>>> +    u32 offset;
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (len <= 0)
>>>> +            return NULL;
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (!oproc->num_mems)
>>>> +            return NULL;
>>>> +
>>>> +    for (i = 0; i < oproc->num_mems; i++) {
>>>> +            if (da >= oproc->mem[i].dev_addr && da + len <=
>>>
>>> Shouldn't this be '<' rather than '<=' ?
>>
>> No, I think <= is correct. You need to consider the initial byte in the
>> range also. Consider a simple case where you provide the exact da + len
>> corresponding to a specific memory range.
> 
> For that specific case you are correct.  On the flip side if @da falls
> somewhere after @mem[i].dev_addr, there is a possibility to clobber
> the first byte of the next range if <= is used.

Not really, you will miss out on the last byte actually if you use just
<. This is just address range check, any memcpy would actually end one
byte before.

Eg: 0x80000 of len 0x10000. I should perfectly be able to copy 0x1000
bytes at 0x8f000.

regards
Suman


> 
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
> 
>>
>>>
>>>> +                oproc->mem[i].dev_addr +  oproc->mem[i].size) {
>>>
>>> One space too many after the '+' .
>>
>> True, I wonder why checkpatch did not catch this.
>>
>>>
>>>> +                    offset = da -  oproc->mem[i].dev_addr;
>>>
>>> One space too many after then '-' .
>>
>> Same, will fix these two.
>>
>> -Tero
>>
>>>
>>>> +                    /* __force to make sparse happy with type conversion */
>>>> +                    return (__force void *)(oproc->mem[i].cpu_addr +
>>>> +                                            offset);
>>>> +            }
>>>> +    }
>>>> +
>>>> +    return NULL;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>   static const struct rproc_ops omap_rproc_ops = {
>>>>      .start          = omap_rproc_start,
>>>>      .stop           = omap_rproc_stop,
>>>>      .kick           = omap_rproc_kick,
>>>> +    .da_to_va       = omap_rproc_da_to_va,
>>>>   };
>>>>
>>>>   static const char * const ipu_mem_names[] = {
>>>> --
>>>> 2.17.1
>>>>
>>>> --
>>
>> --
>> Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki


  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-20  2:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-13 12:55 [PATCHv3 00/15] remoteproc: updates for omap remoteproc support Tero Kristo
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 01/15] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add OMAP remoteproc bindings Tero Kristo
2019-12-20  3:38   ` Suman Anna
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 02/15] remoteproc/omap: Add device tree support Tero Kristo
2019-12-17 23:01   ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-12-19 11:54     ` Tero Kristo
2019-12-20  2:08       ` Suman Anna
2019-12-20  9:36         ` Tero Kristo
2019-12-20 18:17           ` Suman Anna
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 03/15] remoteproc/omap: Add a sanity check for DSP boot address alignment Tero Kristo
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 04/15] remoteproc/omap: Add support to parse internal memories from DT Tero Kristo
2019-12-18  0:22   ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-12-19 12:31     ` Tero Kristo
2019-12-19 17:37       ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-12-20  2:15         ` Suman Anna
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 05/15] remoteproc/omap: Add the rproc ops .da_to_va() implementation Tero Kristo
2019-12-18  0:38   ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-12-19 13:18     ` Tero Kristo
2019-12-20  0:12       ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-12-20  2:34         ` Suman Anna [this message]
2019-12-20 22:15           ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 06/15] remoteproc/omap: Initialize and assign reserved memory node Tero Kristo
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 07/15] remoteproc/omap: Add support for DRA7xx remote processors Tero Kristo
2019-12-18 21:31   ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-12-19 13:29     ` Tero Kristo
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 08/15] remoteproc/omap: Remove the unused fields from platform data Tero Kristo
2019-12-20  2:44   ` Suman Anna
2019-12-20  9:48     ` Tero Kristo
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 09/15] remoteproc/omap: Remove the omap_rproc_reserve_cma declaration Tero Kristo
2019-12-20  2:47   ` Suman Anna
2019-12-20  9:49     ` Tero Kristo
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 10/15] remoteproc/omap: Check for undefined mailbox messages Tero Kristo
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 11/15] remoteproc/omap: Request a timer(s) for remoteproc usage Tero Kristo
2019-12-18 22:43   ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-12-19 13:43     ` Tero Kristo
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 12/15] remoteproc/omap: add support for system suspend/resume Tero Kristo
2019-12-19 21:46   ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-12-20  3:11     ` Suman Anna
2019-12-20 11:04       ` Tero Kristo
2019-12-20 18:23         ` Suman Anna
2019-12-20 21:58       ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 13/15] remoteproc/omap: add support for runtime auto-suspend/resume Tero Kristo
2019-12-19 23:43   ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-12-20  3:24     ` Suman Anna
2019-12-20 11:24       ` Tero Kristo
2019-12-20 18:44         ` Suman Anna
2020-01-02 12:50           ` Tero Kristo
2019-12-20 11:08     ` Tero Kristo
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 14/15] remoteproc/omap: report device exceptions and trigger recovery Tero Kristo
2019-12-13 12:55 ` [PATCHv3 15/15] remoteproc/omap: add watchdog functionality for remote processors Tero Kristo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bd76da62-c9ad-2284-cf4b-8b0f02ed3e66@ti.com \
    --to=s-anna@ti.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®