* [PATCH] drm/mediatek: Drop dependency on ARM
@ 2024-10-29 11:13 Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-10-30 3:30 ` CK Hu (胡俊光)
2024-11-01 7:33 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Chen-Yu Tsai @ 2024-10-29 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chun-Kuang Hu, Philipp Zabel, David Airlie, Simona Vetter,
Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard, Thomas Zimmermann
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai, dri-devel, linux-mediatek, linux-kernel,
Ville Syrjälä
The recent attempt to make the MediaTek DRM driver build for non-ARM
compile tests made the driver unbuildable for arm64 platforms. Since
this is used on both ARM and arm64 platforms, just drop the dependency
on ARM.
Fixes: d2db0b8fd70b ("drm/mediatek: Allow build with COMPILE_TEST=y")
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
---
It looks like the culprit commit was merged through the drm-misc tree.
So please merge this on top ASAP.
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/Kconfig
index 2e0e7c4079b6..f496e6cfdfe0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/Kconfig
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
config DRM_MEDIATEK
tristate "DRM Support for Mediatek SoCs"
depends on DRM
- depends on (ARCH_MEDIATEK && ARM) || COMPILE_TEST
+ depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST
depends on COMMON_CLK
depends on HAVE_ARM_SMCCC || COMPILE_TEST
depends on OF
--
2.47.0.163.g1226f6d8fa-goog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: Drop dependency on ARM 2024-10-29 11:13 [PATCH] drm/mediatek: Drop dependency on ARM Chen-Yu Tsai @ 2024-10-30 3:30 ` CK Hu (胡俊光) 2024-10-30 8:25 ` mripard 2024-11-01 7:33 ` Chen-Yu Tsai 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: CK Hu (胡俊光) @ 2024-10-30 3:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: wenst, chunkuang.hu, tzimmermann, simona, mripard, p.zabel, maarten.lankhorst, airlied Cc: dri-devel, linux-kernel, linux-mediatek, ville.syrjala Hi, Chen-yu: On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 19:13 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you have verified the sender or the content. > > > The recent attempt to make the MediaTek DRM driver build for non-ARM > compile tests made the driver unbuildable for arm64 platforms. Since > this is used on both ARM and arm64 platforms, just drop the dependency > on ARM. Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com> I find this days ago, but I don't know there is someone who apply it. Let this patch go through drm-misc tree which already has the bug patch. Regards, CK > > Fixes: d2db0b8fd70b ("drm/mediatek: Allow build with COMPILE_TEST=y") > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org> > --- > It looks like the culprit commit was merged through the drm-misc tree. > So please merge this on top ASAP. > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/Kconfig | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/Kconfig > index 2e0e7c4079b6..f496e6cfdfe0 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/Kconfig > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ > config DRM_MEDIATEK > tristate "DRM Support for Mediatek SoCs" > depends on DRM > - depends on (ARCH_MEDIATEK && ARM) || COMPILE_TEST > + depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST > depends on COMMON_CLK > depends on HAVE_ARM_SMCCC || COMPILE_TEST > depends on OF > -- > 2.47.0.163.g1226f6d8fa-goog > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: Drop dependency on ARM 2024-10-30 3:30 ` CK Hu (胡俊光) @ 2024-10-30 8:25 ` mripard 2024-10-30 8:48 ` CK Hu (胡俊光) 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: mripard @ 2024-10-30 8:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: CK Hu (胡俊光) Cc: wenst, chunkuang.hu, tzimmermann, simona, p.zabel, maarten.lankhorst, airlied, dri-devel, linux-kernel, linux-mediatek, ville.syrjala [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 877 bytes --] On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 03:30:34AM +0000, CK Hu (胡俊光) wrote: > Hi, Chen-yu: > > On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 19:13 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you have verified the sender or the content. > > > > > > The recent attempt to make the MediaTek DRM driver build for non-ARM > > compile tests made the driver unbuildable for arm64 platforms. Since > > this is used on both ARM and arm64 platforms, just drop the dependency > > on ARM. > > Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com> > > I find this days ago, but I don't know there is someone who apply it. > Let this patch go through drm-misc tree which already has the bug patch. If you are ok with this patch, why didn't you apply it yourself? I think that's very much the expectation, so it's probably took a while to merge. Maxime [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 273 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: Drop dependency on ARM 2024-10-30 8:25 ` mripard @ 2024-10-30 8:48 ` CK Hu (胡俊光) 2024-10-30 8:52 ` Chen-Yu Tsai 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: CK Hu (胡俊光) @ 2024-10-30 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mripard Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mediatek, wenst, chunkuang.hu, tzimmermann, simona, ville.syrjala, p.zabel, dri-devel, maarten.lankhorst, airlied On Wed, 2024-10-30 at 09:25 +0100, mripard@kernel.org wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 03:30:34AM +0000, CK Hu (胡俊光) wrote: > > Hi, Chen-yu: > > > > On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 19:13 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you have verified the sender or the content. > > > > > > > > > The recent attempt to make the MediaTek DRM driver build for non-ARM > > > compile tests made the driver unbuildable for arm64 platforms. Since > > > this is used on both ARM and arm64 platforms, just drop the dependency > > > on ARM. > > > > Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com> > > > > I find this days ago, but I don't know there is someone who apply it. > > Let this patch go through drm-misc tree which already has the bug patch. > > If you are ok with this patch, why didn't you apply it yourself? > > I think that's very much the expectation, so it's probably took a while to merge. That's ok for me to apply it if drm-misc has no plan to apply it. Regards, CK > > Maxime ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: Drop dependency on ARM 2024-10-30 8:48 ` CK Hu (胡俊光) @ 2024-10-30 8:52 ` Chen-Yu Tsai 2024-10-31 9:30 ` mripard 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Chen-Yu Tsai @ 2024-10-30 8:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: CK Hu (胡俊光) Cc: mripard, linux-kernel, linux-mediatek, chunkuang.hu, tzimmermann, simona, ville.syrjala, p.zabel, dri-devel, maarten.lankhorst, airlied On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 4:48 PM CK Hu (胡俊光) <ck.hu@mediatek.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 2024-10-30 at 09:25 +0100, mripard@kernel.org wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 03:30:34AM +0000, CK Hu (胡俊光) wrote: > > > Hi, Chen-yu: > > > > > > On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 19:13 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > > > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you have verified the sender or the content. > > > > > > > > > > > > The recent attempt to make the MediaTek DRM driver build for non-ARM > > > > compile tests made the driver unbuildable for arm64 platforms. Since > > > > this is used on both ARM and arm64 platforms, just drop the dependency > > > > on ARM. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com> > > > > > > I find this days ago, but I don't know there is someone who apply it. > > > Let this patch go through drm-misc tree which already has the bug patch. > > > > If you are ok with this patch, why didn't you apply it yourself? > > > > I think that's very much the expectation, so it's probably took a while to merge. > > That's ok for me to apply it if drm-misc has no plan to apply it. I'm confused. The culprit patch is already in drm-misc. So this one has to go in drm-misc as well. I can try to apply it to drm-misc myself, or have a colleague assist with that. I'll let it sit for another day in case anyone has something to say about it. ChenYu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: Drop dependency on ARM 2024-10-30 8:52 ` Chen-Yu Tsai @ 2024-10-31 9:30 ` mripard 2024-10-31 9:34 ` Chen-Yu Tsai 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: mripard @ 2024-10-31 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chen-Yu Tsai Cc: CK Hu (胡俊光), linux-kernel, linux-mediatek, chunkuang.hu, tzimmermann, simona, ville.syrjala, p.zabel, dri-devel, maarten.lankhorst, airlied [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1675 bytes --] On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 04:52:17PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 4:48 PM CK Hu (胡俊光) <ck.hu@mediatek.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2024-10-30 at 09:25 +0100, mripard@kernel.org wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 03:30:34AM +0000, CK Hu (胡俊光) wrote: > > > > Hi, Chen-yu: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 19:13 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > > > > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you have verified the sender or the content. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The recent attempt to make the MediaTek DRM driver build for non-ARM > > > > > compile tests made the driver unbuildable for arm64 platforms. Since > > > > > this is used on both ARM and arm64 platforms, just drop the dependency > > > > > on ARM. > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com> > > > > > > > > I find this days ago, but I don't know there is someone who apply it. > > > > Let this patch go through drm-misc tree which already has the bug patch. > > > > > > If you are ok with this patch, why didn't you apply it yourself? > > > > > > I think that's very much the expectation, so it's probably took a while to merge. > > > > That's ok for me to apply it if drm-misc has no plan to apply it. > > I'm confused. The culprit patch is already in drm-misc. So this one has > to go in drm-misc as well. > > I can try to apply it to drm-misc myself, or have a colleague assist with > that. I'll let it sit for another day in case anyone has something to say > about it. Sorry, I was under the assumption that CK had drm-misc commit rights? It should go through drm-misc indeed. Maxime [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 273 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: Drop dependency on ARM 2024-10-31 9:30 ` mripard @ 2024-10-31 9:34 ` Chen-Yu Tsai 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Chen-Yu Tsai @ 2024-10-31 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mripard Cc: CK Hu (胡俊光), linux-kernel, linux-mediatek, chunkuang.hu, tzimmermann, simona, ville.syrjala, p.zabel, dri-devel, maarten.lankhorst, airlied On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 5:30 PM mripard@kernel.org <mripard@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 04:52:17PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 4:48 PM CK Hu (胡俊光) <ck.hu@mediatek.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 2024-10-30 at 09:25 +0100, mripard@kernel.org wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 03:30:34AM +0000, CK Hu (胡俊光) wrote: > > > > > Hi, Chen-yu: > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 19:13 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > > > > > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you have verified the sender or the content. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The recent attempt to make the MediaTek DRM driver build for non-ARM > > > > > > compile tests made the driver unbuildable for arm64 platforms. Since > > > > > > this is used on both ARM and arm64 platforms, just drop the dependency > > > > > > on ARM. > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com> > > > > > > > > > > I find this days ago, but I don't know there is someone who apply it. > > > > > Let this patch go through drm-misc tree which already has the bug patch. > > > > > > > > If you are ok with this patch, why didn't you apply it yourself? > > > > > > > > I think that's very much the expectation, so it's probably took a while to merge. > > > > > > That's ok for me to apply it if drm-misc has no plan to apply it. > > > > I'm confused. The culprit patch is already in drm-misc. So this one has > > to go in drm-misc as well. > > > > I can try to apply it to drm-misc myself, or have a colleague assist with > > that. I'll let it sit for another day in case anyone has something to say > > about it. > > Sorry, I was under the assumption that CK had drm-misc commit rights? It > should go through drm-misc indeed. CK has always maintained a separate tree on git.kernel.org, so I don't know if drm-misc commit rights were ever granted? ChenYu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: Drop dependency on ARM 2024-10-29 11:13 [PATCH] drm/mediatek: Drop dependency on ARM Chen-Yu Tsai 2024-10-30 3:30 ` CK Hu (胡俊光) @ 2024-11-01 7:33 ` Chen-Yu Tsai 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Chen-Yu Tsai @ 2024-11-01 7:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chun-Kuang Hu, Philipp Zabel, David Airlie, Simona Vetter, Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard, Thomas Zimmermann, Chen-Yu Tsai Cc: dri-devel, linux-mediatek, linux-kernel, Ville Syrjälä On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 19:13:07 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > The recent attempt to make the MediaTek DRM driver build for non-ARM > compile tests made the driver unbuildable for arm64 platforms. Since > this is used on both ARM and arm64 platforms, just drop the dependency > on ARM. > > Applied, thanks! [1/1] drm/mediatek: Drop dependency on ARM commit: 89115aeecf38bfee3c5e79561b5c34a256e1a06a Best regards, -- Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-11-01 7:33 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-10-29 11:13 [PATCH] drm/mediatek: Drop dependency on ARM Chen-Yu Tsai 2024-10-30 3:30 ` CK Hu (胡俊光) 2024-10-30 8:25 ` mripard 2024-10-30 8:48 ` CK Hu (胡俊光) 2024-10-30 8:52 ` Chen-Yu Tsai 2024-10-31 9:30 ` mripard 2024-10-31 9:34 ` Chen-Yu Tsai 2024-11-01 7:33 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®