Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: Add support for pcb8385

[Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>]

Hi, Horatiu,

On 11/17/25 14:57, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> Add basic support for pcb8385 [1]. It is a modular board which allows
> to add different daughter cards on which there are different PHYs.
> This adds support for UART, LEDs and I2C.
> 
> [1] https://www.microchip.com/en-us/development-tool/ev83e85a
> 
> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile          |   3 +-
>  .../boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dts    | 137 ++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dts
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile
> index 79cd38fdc7dab..08986c24a4700 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile
> @@ -102,4 +102,5 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_SOC_LAN966) += \
>  	lan966x-kontron-kswitch-d10-mmt-8g.dtb \
>  	lan966x-pcb8290.dtb \
>  	lan966x-pcb8291.dtb \
> -	lan966x-pcb8309.dtb
> +	lan966x-pcb8309.dtb \
> +	lan966x-pcb8385.dtb
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..f4817cee93436
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> +/*
> + * lan966x-pcb8385.dts - Device Tree file for PCB8385
> + */
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include "lan966x.dtsi"
> +#include "dt-bindings/phy/phy-lan966x-serdes.h"
> +
> +/ {
> +	model = "Microchip EVB - LAN9668";
> +	compatible = "microchip,lan9668-pcb8385", "microchip,lan9668", "microchip,lan966";
> +
> +	chosen {
> +		stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
> +	};
> +
> +	aliases {
> +		serial0 = &usart3;
> +	};
> +
> +	gpio-restart {
> +		compatible = "gpio-restart";
> +		gpios = <&gpio 59 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +		open-source;
> +		priority = <200>;
> +	};
> +
> +	leds {
> +		compatible = "gpio-leds";
> +
> +		led-p1-green {
> +			label = "cu0:green";
> +			gpios = <&sgpio_out 2 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +			default-state = "off";
> +			linux,default-trigger = "e200413c.mdio-mii:01:link";
> +		};
> +
> +		led-p1-yellow {
> +			label = "cu0:yellow";
> +			gpios = <&sgpio_out 2 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +			default-state = "off";
> +		};
> +
> +		led-p2-green {
> +			label = "cu1:green";
> +			gpios = <&sgpio_out 3 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +			default-state = "off";
> +			linux,default-trigger = "e200413c.mdio-mii:02:link";
> +		};
> +
> +		led-p2-yellow {
> +			label = "cu1:yellow";
> +			gpios = <&sgpio_out 3 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +			default-state = "off";
> +		};
> +	};
> +};
> +
> +&aes {
> +	status = "disabled"; /* Reserved by secure OS */
> +};
> +
> +&gpio {
> +	fc0_b_pins: fc0-b-pins {
> +		/* SCL, SDA */
> +		pins = "GPIO_25", "GPIO_26";
> +		function = "fc0_b";
> +	};
> +
> +	fc3_b_pins: fc3-b-pins {
> +		/* RX, TX */
> +		pins = "GPIO_52", "GPIO_53";
> +		function = "fc3_b";
> +	};
> +
> +	sgpio_a_pins: sgpio-a-pins {
> +		/* SCK, D0, D1, LD */
> +		pins = "GPIO_32", "GPIO_33", "GPIO_34", "GPIO_35";
> +		function = "sgpio_a";
> +	};
> +};
> +
> +&flx0 {

This would go after aes node to have them alphanumerically sorted. I can
handled it while applying, if any.

> +	atmel,flexcom-mode = <ATMEL_FLEXCOM_MODE_TWI>;
> +	status = "okay";
> +
> +	i2c0: i2c@600 {
> +		pinctrl-0 = <&fc0_b_pins>;
> +		pinctrl-names = "default";
> +		dmas = <0>, <0>;
> +		i2c-analog-filter;
> +		i2c-digital-filter;
> +		i2c-digital-filter-width-ns = <35>;
> +		i2c-sda-hold-time-ns = <1500>;
> +		status = "okay";
> +	};
> +};
> +
> +&flx3 {
> +	atmel,flexcom-mode = <ATMEL_FLEXCOM_MODE_USART>;
> +	status = "okay";
> +
> +	usart3: serial@200 {
> +		pinctrl-0 = <&fc3_b_pins>;
> +		pinctrl-names = "default";
> +		status = "okay";
> +	};
> +};
> +
> +&i2c0 {
> +	eeprom@54 {
> +		compatible = "atmel,24c01";
> +		reg = <0x54>;
> +		status = "okay";
> +	};
> +
> +	eeprom@55 {
> +		compatible = "atmel,24c01";
> +		reg = <0x55>;
> +		status = "okay";
> +	};

Any reason for not keeping these above under "i2c0: i2c@600 {" ?

Thank you,
Claudiu

> +};
> +
> +&sgpio {
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&sgpio_a_pins>;
> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> +	microchip,sgpio-port-ranges = <0 3>;
> +	status = "okay";
> +
> +	gpio@0 {
> +		ngpios = <64>;
> +	};
> +	gpio@1 {
> +		ngpios = <64>;
> +	};
> +};