From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<x86@kernel.org>, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: nSVM: deal with L1 hypervisor that intercepts interrupts but lets L2 control EFLAGS.IF
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 12:34:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d893664-ff8d-83ed-e9be-441b45992f68@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211213104634.199141-2-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
On 12/13/21 11:46, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Fix a corner case in which L1 hypervisor intercepts interrupts (INTERCEPT_INTR)
> and either doesn't use virtual interrupt masking (V_INTR_MASKING) or
> enters a nested guest with EFLAGS.IF disabled prior to the entry.
>
> In this case, despite the fact that L1 intercepts the interrupts,
> KVM still needs to set up an interrupt window to wait before it
> can deliver INTR vmexit.
>
> Currently instead, the KVM enters an endless loop of 'req_immediate_exit'.
>
> Note that on VMX this case is impossible as there is only
> 'vmexit on external interrupts' execution control which either set,
> in which case both host and guest's EFLAGS.IF
> is ignored, or clear, in which case no VMexit is delivered.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index e57e6857e0630..c9668a3b51011 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -3372,17 +3372,21 @@ bool svm_interrupt_blocked(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> static int svm_interrupt_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool for_injection)
> {
> struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
> + bool blocked;
> +
> if (svm->nested.nested_run_pending)
> return -EBUSY;
>
> + blocked = svm_interrupt_blocked(vcpu);
> +
> /*
> * An IRQ must not be injected into L2 if it's supposed to VM-Exit,
> * e.g. if the IRQ arrived asynchronously after checking nested events.
> */
> if (for_injection && is_guest_mode(vcpu) && nested_exit_on_intr(svm))
> - return -EBUSY;
> -
> - return !svm_interrupt_blocked(vcpu);
> + return !blocked ? -EBUSY : 0;
> + else
> + return !blocked;
> }
>
> static void svm_enable_irq_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
Right, another case is when CLGI is not trapped and the guest therefore
runs with GIF=0. I think that means that a similar change has to be
done in all the *_allowed functions.
I would write it as
if (svm->nested.nested_run_pending)
return -EBUSY;
if (svm_interrupt_blocked(vcpu))
return 0;
/*
* An IRQ must not be injected into L2 if it's supposed to VM-Exit,
* e.g. if the IRQ arrived asynchronously after checking nested events.
*/
if (for_injection && is_guest_mode(vcpu) && nested_exit_on_intr(svm))
return -EBUSY;
return 1;
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-13 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-13 10:46 [PATCH v2 0/5] RFC: KVM: SVM: Allow L1's AVIC to co-exist with nesting Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: nSVM: deal with L1 hypervisor that intercepts interrupts but lets L2 control EFLAGS.IF Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-13 11:34 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-12-13 13:07 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-13 13:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-13 13:29 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: SVM: allow to force AVIC to be enabled Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-04 22:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-05 10:54 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-05 17:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: SVM: fix race between interrupt delivery and AVIC inhibition Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-04 22:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-05 11:03 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-05 11:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-05 12:15 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-07 15:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-07 23:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-10 15:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: x86: don't touch irr_pending in kvm_apic_update_apicv when inhibiting it Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-04 22:57 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-05 10:56 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: SVM: allow AVIC to co-exist with a nested guest running Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-05 21:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-06 8:44 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-06 17:41 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0d893664-ff8d-83ed-e9be-441b45992f68@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome