mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	x86@kernel.org (maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)),
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: SVM: fix race between interrupt delivery and AVIC inhibition
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 12:46:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211213104634.199141-4-mlevitsk@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211213104634.199141-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com>

If svm_deliver_avic_intr is called just after the target vcpu's AVIC got
inhibited, it might read a stale value of vcpu->arch.apicv_active
which can lead to the target vCPU not noticing the interrupt.

To fix this use load-acquire/store-release so that, if the target vCPU
is IN_GUEST_MODE, we're guaranteed to see a previous disabling of the
AVIC.  If AVIC has been disabled in the meanwhile, proceed with the
KVM_REQ_EVENT-based delivery.

All this complicated logic is actually exactly how we can handle an
incomplete IPI vmexit; the only difference lies in who sets IRR, whether
KVM or the processor.

Also incomplete IPI vmexit, has the same races as svm_deliver_avic_intr.
therefore just reuse the avic_kick_target_vcpu for it as well.

Reported-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Co-developed-with: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c      |  4 +-
 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c
index 90364d02f22aa..34f62da2fbadd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c
@@ -289,6 +289,47 @@ static int avic_init_backing_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void avic_kick_target_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	bool in_guest_mode;
+
+	/*
+	 * vcpu->arch.apicv_active is read after vcpu->mode.  Pairs
+	 * with smp_store_release in vcpu_enter_guest.
+	 */
+	in_guest_mode = (smp_load_acquire(&vcpu->mode) == IN_GUEST_MODE);
+	if (READ_ONCE(vcpu->arch.apicv_active)) {
+		if (in_guest_mode) {
+			/*
+			 * Signal the doorbell to tell hardware to inject the IRQ if the vCPU
+			 * is in the guest.  If the vCPU is not in the guest, hardware will
+			 * automatically process AVIC interrupts at VMRUN.
+			 *
+			 * Note, the vCPU could get migrated to a different pCPU at any
+			 * point, which could result in signalling the wrong/previous
+			 * pCPU.  But if that happens the vCPU is guaranteed to do a
+			 * VMRUN (after being migrated) and thus will process pending
+			 * interrupts, i.e. a doorbell is not needed (and the spurious
+			 * one is harmless).
+			 */
+			int cpu = READ_ONCE(vcpu->cpu);
+			if (cpu != get_cpu())
+				wrmsrl(SVM_AVIC_DOORBELL, kvm_cpu_get_apicid(cpu));
+			put_cpu();
+		} else {
+			/*
+			 * Wake the vCPU if it was blocking.  KVM will then detect the
+			 * pending IRQ when checking if the vCPU has a wake event.
+			 */
+			kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu);
+		}
+	} else {
+		/* Compare this case with __apic_accept_irq.  */
+		kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
+		kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
+	}
+}
+
 static void avic_kick_target_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_lapic *source,
 				   u32 icrl, u32 icrh)
 {
@@ -304,8 +345,10 @@ static void avic_kick_target_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_lapic *source,
 	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
 		if (kvm_apic_match_dest(vcpu, source, icrl & APIC_SHORT_MASK,
 					GET_APIC_DEST_FIELD(icrh),
-					icrl & APIC_DEST_MASK))
-			kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu);
+					icrl & APIC_DEST_MASK)) {
+			vcpu->arch.apic->irr_pending = true;
+			avic_kick_target_vcpu(vcpu);
+		}
 	}
 }
 
@@ -671,9 +714,12 @@ void svm_load_eoi_exitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *eoi_exit_bitmap)
 
 int svm_deliver_avic_intr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vec)
 {
-	if (!vcpu->arch.apicv_active)
-		return -1;
-
+	/*
+	 * Below, we have to handle anyway the case of AVIC being disabled
+	 * in the middle of this function, and there is hardly any overhead
+	 * if AVIC is disabled.  So, we do not bother returning -1 and handle
+	 * the kick ourselves for disabled APICv.
+	 */
 	kvm_lapic_set_irr(vec, vcpu->arch.apic);
 
 	/*
@@ -684,34 +730,7 @@ int svm_deliver_avic_intr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vec)
 	 * the doorbell if the vCPU is already running in the guest.
 	 */
 	smp_mb__after_atomic();
-
-	/*
-	 * Signal the doorbell to tell hardware to inject the IRQ if the vCPU
-	 * is in the guest.  If the vCPU is not in the guest, hardware will
-	 * automatically process AVIC interrupts at VMRUN.
-	 */
-	if (vcpu->mode == IN_GUEST_MODE) {
-		int cpu = READ_ONCE(vcpu->cpu);
-
-		/*
-		 * Note, the vCPU could get migrated to a different pCPU at any
-		 * point, which could result in signalling the wrong/previous
-		 * pCPU.  But if that happens the vCPU is guaranteed to do a
-		 * VMRUN (after being migrated) and thus will process pending
-		 * interrupts, i.e. a doorbell is not needed (and the spurious
-		 * one is harmless).
-		 */
-		if (cpu != get_cpu())
-			wrmsrl(SVM_AVIC_DOORBELL, kvm_cpu_get_apicid(cpu));
-		put_cpu();
-	} else {
-		/*
-		 * Wake the vCPU if it was blocking.  KVM will then detect the
-		 * pending IRQ when checking if the vCPU has a wake event.
-		 */
-		kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu);
-	}
-
+	avic_kick_target_vcpu(vcpu);
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 85127b3e3690b..81a74d86ee5eb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -9869,7 +9869,9 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	 * result in virtual interrupt delivery.
 	 */
 	local_irq_disable();
-	vcpu->mode = IN_GUEST_MODE;
+
+	/* Store vcpu->apicv_active before vcpu->mode.  */
+	smp_store_release(&vcpu->mode, IN_GUEST_MODE);
 
 	srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
 
-- 
2.26.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-13 10:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-13 10:46 [PATCH v2 0/5] RFC: KVM: SVM: Allow L1's AVIC to co-exist with nesting Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: nSVM: deal with L1 hypervisor that intercepts interrupts but lets L2 control EFLAGS.IF Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-13 11:34   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-13 13:07     ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-13 13:15       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-13 13:29         ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: SVM: allow to force AVIC to be enabled Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-04 22:25   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-05 10:54     ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-05 17:46       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-13 10:46 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2022-01-04 22:52   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: SVM: fix race between interrupt delivery and AVIC inhibition Sean Christopherson
2022-01-05 11:03     ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-05 11:54       ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-05 12:15         ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-07 15:32       ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-07 23:42         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-10 15:10           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: x86: don't touch irr_pending in kvm_apic_update_apicv when inhibiting it Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-04 22:57   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-05 10:56     ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: SVM: allow AVIC to co-exist with a nested guest running Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-05 21:56   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-06  8:44     ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-06 17:41       ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211213104634.199141-4-mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome