mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Julien Thierry <jthierry@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] objtool: Add support for return trampoline call
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 13:03:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0e8e9c1f-e03b-207e-a527-cf8deddf82a0@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200406093143.GH20730@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>



On 4/6/20 11:31 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 10:19:56AM +0200, Alexandre Chartre wrote:
>>
>> On 4/4/20 5:51 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 09:22:32AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 03:32:18PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 05:46:20PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 10:17:57AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>>>>>>> Peter, I think my previous idea for UNWIND_HINT_ADJUST stack_add=8 would
>>>>>>> work here?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, it would.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, I have reconsidered. While it will shut up objtool, it will not
>>>>> 'work'. That is, the ORC data generated will not correctly unwind.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll try and write a longer email tonight.
>>>>
>>>> Right, that's what I've been trying to say.  The ORC data will be
>>>> non-deterministic unless we unroll the loop.  Or did you mean something
>>>> else?
>>>
>>> The below should result in deterministic code.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
>>> index 07e95dcb40ad..109ee65f4a11 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
>>> @@ -59,8 +59,8 @@
>>>    	jmp	775b;				\
>>>    774:						\
>>>    	dec	reg;				\
>>> -	jnz	771b;				\
>>> -	add	$(BITS_PER_LONG/8) * nr, sp;
>>> +	add	$(BITS_PER_LONG/8) * $2, sp;	\
>>> +	jnz	771b;
>>>    #ifdef __ASSEMBLY__
>>
>> Nice. This works fine and allows to remove ANNOTATE_NOSPEC_ALTERNATIVE when
>> using __FILL_RETURN_BUFFER. However this is probably less performant because
>> we now have nr/2 add instructions instead of just 1.
> 
> Does it actually matter though? That is, can you measure the difference?
> 

I didn't do any measurement, I am just anticipating concerns others might have
as this code is used during context and vmexit. But I agree this might not be
significant.

alex.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-06 10:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-02  8:22 [PATCH 0/7] objtool changes to remove most ANNOTATE_NOSPEC_ALTERNATIVE Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-02  8:22 ` [PATCH 1/7] objtool: is_fentry_call() crashes if call has no destination Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-02  8:22 ` [PATCH 2/7] objtool: Allow branches within the same alternative Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-02 12:03   ` Julien Thierry
2020-04-02 12:38     ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-02  8:22 ` [PATCH 3/7] objtool: Add support for intra-function calls Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-02 12:53   ` Julien Thierry
2020-04-02 13:24     ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-02 13:38       ` Julien Thierry
2020-04-02 14:56         ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-02 15:04       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-02 15:54         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-03  7:06           ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-02 15:49     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-02 17:27       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-03  8:01       ` Julien Thierry
2020-04-03 12:41         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-03 12:49           ` Julien Thierry
2020-04-03 14:37             ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-03 14:44         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-02  8:22 ` [PATCH 4/7] objtool: Add support for return trampoline call Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-02 13:26   ` Julien Thierry
2020-04-02 14:46     ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-02 15:31       ` Julien Thierry
2020-04-02 15:40         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-03  8:11           ` Julien Thierry
2020-04-03 15:17             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-03 15:22               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-03 15:32                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-03 15:46               ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-03 15:55                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-04 13:32                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-04 14:22                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-04 15:51                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-06  8:19                       ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-06  9:31                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-06 11:03                           ` Alexandre Chartre [this message]
2020-04-06 14:16                       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-02 15:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-03  7:19     ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-06 14:34     ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-06 14:55       ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-02  8:22 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86/speculation: Annotate intra-function calls Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-03 16:05   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-03 16:16     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-03 17:14       ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-03 17:18         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-03 17:24           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-03 18:20             ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-02  8:22 ` [PATCH 6/7] x86/speculation: Annotate retpoline return instructions Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-02  8:22 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86/speculation: Remove most ANNOTATE_NOSPEC_ALTERNATIVE Alexandre Chartre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0e8e9c1f-e03b-207e-a527-cf8deddf82a0@oracle.com \
    --to=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=jthierry@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®