From: "liuyuntao (F)" <liuyuntao12@huawei.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
<tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <bp@alien8.de>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
<nathan@kernel.org>, <nicolas@fjasle.eu>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
<jpoimboe@kernel.org>, <leitao@debian.org>, <petr.pavlu@suse.com>,
<richard.weiyang@gmail.com>, <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
<ndesaulniers@google.com>, <jgross@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: enable HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:48:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ead5774-92ca-4a84-82e3-ec5c198794e5@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNAQgkt6t6UEB+_q15KJb2STVL6oqUo3mFM8EzumFH+-mYw@mail.gmail.com>
On 2024/4/23 0:01, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 3:41 PM Yuntao Liu <liuyuntao12@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> The current x86 architecture does not yet support the
>> HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION feature. x86 is widely used in
>> embedded scenarios, and enabling this feature would be beneficial for
>> reducing the size of the kernel image.
>>
>> In order to make this work, we keep the necessary tables by annotating
>> them with KEEP, also it requires further changes to linker script to KEEP
>> some tables and wildcard compiler generated sections into the right place.
>>
>> Enabling CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC or CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE will enable
>> the objtool's --orc and --retpoline parameters, which will alter the
>> layout of the binary file, thereby preventing gc-sections from functioning
>> properly. Therefore, HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION should only be
>> selected when they are not enabled.
>>
>> Enabling CONFIG_LTO_CLANG or CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT will use vmlinux.o
>> instead of performing the slow LTO link again. This can also prevent
>> gc-sections from functioning properly. Therefore, using this optimization
>> when CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION is not enabled.
>>
>> The size comparison of zImage is as follows:
>> x86_def_defconfig i386_defconfig tinyconfig
>> 10892288 10826240 607232 no dce
>> 10748928 10719744 529408 dce
>> 1.3% 0.98% 12.8% shrink
>>
>> When using smaller config file, there is a significant reduction in the
>> size of the zImage.
>> ---
>
>> diff --git a/scripts/link-vmlinux.sh b/scripts/link-vmlinux.sh
>> index 7862a8101747..7287b5a9f17d 100755
>> --- a/scripts/link-vmlinux.sh
>> +++ b/scripts/link-vmlinux.sh
>> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ vmlinux_link()
>> # skip output file argument
>> shift
>>
>> - if is_enabled CONFIG_LTO_CLANG || is_enabled CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT; then
>> + if [ is_enabled CONFIG_LTO_CLANG || is_enabled CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT ] && [ ! is_enabled CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION ]; then
>> # Use vmlinux.o instead of performing the slow LTO link again.
>> objs=vmlinux.o
>> libs=
>> --
>
>
> This is wrong.
> You should not put is_enabled inside [ ... ]
>
My mistake.
> (is_enabled CONFIG_LTO_CLANG || is_enabled CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT) && !
> is_enabled CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION
>
> is still weird.
>
>
> When CONFIG_LTO_CLANG=y and CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION=y,
> the result of LTO will be discarded.
>
On arm and risc-v, these two configs can both be enabled without any
issues, i think, it should be the same for x86 as well.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-23 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-22 6:05 Yuntao Liu
2024-04-22 16:01 ` Masahiro Yamada
2024-04-23 11:48 ` liuyuntao (F) [this message]
2024-04-22 19:24 ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-04-23 12:02 ` liuyuntao (F)
2024-04-23 0:59 ` Wei Yang
2024-04-23 12:10 ` liuyuntao (F)
2024-04-24 11:06 ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-25 6:37 ` liuyuntao (F)
2024-04-25 9:21 ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-25 9:41 ` liuyuntao (F)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0ead5774-92ca-4a84-82e3-ec5c198794e5@huawei.com \
--to=liuyuntao12@huawei.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=nicolas@fjasle.eu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=petr.pavlu@suse.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®