From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
To: "liuyuntao (F)" <liuyuntao12@huawei.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
<tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <bp@alien8.de>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
<masahiroy@kernel.org>, <nathan@kernel.org>, <nicolas@fjasle.eu>,
<peterz@infradead.org>, <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
<leitao@debian.org>, <petr.pavlu@suse.com>,
<richard.weiyang@gmail.com>, <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
<ndesaulniers@google.com>, <jgross@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: enable HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:21:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa7f3c1b-7693-465c-9f24-e6176074a818@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d129733e-6c53-41b9-ae23-4a97c4eb5a30@huawei.com>
From: Liuyuntao (F) <liuyuntao12@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 14:37:19 +0800
>
>
> On 2024/4/24 19:06, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>> From: Yuntao Liu <liuyuntao12@huawei.com>
>> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 06:05:56 +0000
>>
>>> The current x86 architecture does not yet support the
>>> HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION feature. x86 is widely used in
>>> embedded scenarios, and enabling this feature would be beneficial for
>>> reducing the size of the kernel image.
>>>
>>> In order to make this work, we keep the necessary tables by annotating
>>> them with KEEP, also it requires further changes to linker script to
>>> KEEP
>>> some tables and wildcard compiler generated sections into the right
>>> place.
>>>
>>> Enabling CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC or CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE will enable
>>> the objtool's --orc and --retpoline parameters, which will alter the
>>> layout of the binary file, thereby preventing gc-sections from
>>> functioning
>>> properly. Therefore, HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION should only be
>>> selected when they are not enabled.
>>
>> Dunno, I have DCE enabled for years on my home kernel, see commit [0]
>> with both ORC and retpolines enabled, and I didn't have any issues.
>> vmlinux still shrinks well, even with Clang LTO.
>>
>>>
>>> Enabling CONFIG_LTO_CLANG or CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT will use vmlinux.o
>>> instead of performing the slow LTO link again. This can also prevent
>>> gc-sections from functioning properly. Therefore, using this
>>> optimization
>>> when CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION is not enabled.
>>>
>>> The size comparison of zImage is as follows:
>>> x86_def_defconfig i386_defconfig tinyconfig
>>> 10892288 10826240 607232 no dce
>>> 10748928 10719744 529408 dce
>>> 1.3% 0.98% 12.8% shrink
>>>
>>> When using smaller config file, there is a significant reduction in the
>>> size of the zImage.
>>
>> [0] https://github.com/solbjorn/linux/commit/25c4953ea73d
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Olek
>
> I apply your patch, and use LLVM toolchain to compile the kernel, it not
> boot on QEMU.
> I use the following command.
>> qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 2 -m 1024M -nographic -kernel
>> mainline_linux/arch/x86/boot/bzImage -hda rootfs.img -append
>> "root=/dev/sda console=ttyS0 rootfstype=ext4 init=/linuxrc rw"
> Have you tested your patch on the latest mainline version?
Nope, it was a year ago and I haven't touched it since then. Did the
low-level code change a lot?
> Thanks.
> Yuntao.
Thanks,
Olek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-25 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-22 6:05 Yuntao Liu
2024-04-22 16:01 ` Masahiro Yamada
2024-04-23 11:48 ` liuyuntao (F)
2024-04-22 19:24 ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-04-23 12:02 ` liuyuntao (F)
2024-04-23 0:59 ` Wei Yang
2024-04-23 12:10 ` liuyuntao (F)
2024-04-24 11:06 ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-04-25 6:37 ` liuyuntao (F)
2024-04-25 9:21 ` Alexander Lobakin [this message]
2024-04-25 9:41 ` liuyuntao (F)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa7f3c1b-7693-465c-9f24-e6176074a818@intel.com \
--to=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuyuntao12@huawei.com \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=nicolas@fjasle.eu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=petr.pavlu@suse.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®