* [PATCH] hfsplus: free cached B-tree nodes on hfs_btree_open() error path
@ 2026-09-30 18:50 Mahmut Emin Kurhan
2026-09-30 23:04 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Mahmut Emin Kurhan @ 2026-09-30 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-fsdevel; +Cc: slava, glaubitz, frank.li, linux-kernel, Mahmut Emin Kurhan
hfs_btree_open() can fail after hfs_bnode_find(tree, HFSPLUS_TREE_HEAD)
has already inserted the head node into tree->node_hash.
__hfs_bnode_create() inserts the new bnode into tree->node_hash before
it reads the node's pages; if a page read fails it sets HFS_BNODE_ERROR
and returns the node still hashed. hfs_bnode_find() then takes its
node_error path, which calls hfs_bnode_put(). hfs_bnode_put() only frees
a node once its refcount reaches zero *and* HFS_BNODE_DELETED is set; for
the errored head node that flag is not set, so the node stays in
tree->node_hash with a zero refcount.
hfs_btree_open() then sees IS_ERR(node) and jumps to free_tree:, which
does a bare kfree(tree). Only hfs_btree_close() walks tree->node_hash[]
and frees the cached nodes, so the head node is leaked. Mounting a
crafted HFS+ image whose head B-tree node fails to read therefore leaks
kernel memory on every attempt.
Reported by kmemleak while fuzzing HFS+ image mounts:
BUG: memory leak
unreferenced object (size 192):
__hfs_bnode_create+0x105/0x8d0 fs/hfsplus/bnode.c
hfsplus_bnode_find fs/hfsplus/bnode.c
hfsplus_btree_open fs/hfsplus/btree.c
hfsplus_fill_super fs/hfsplus/super.c
Free any nodes still present in tree->node_hash on the error path before
freeing the tree. The paths that reach free_tree before hfs_bnode_find()
have an empty hash, so the loop is a no-op there.
Found via coverage-guided fuzzing (syzkaller + kmemleak) by Noroxi.
Signed-off-by: Mahmut Emin Kurhan <guvenlik@noroxi.com>
---
fs/hfsplus/btree.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/hfsplus/btree.c b/fs/hfsplus/btree.c
index 2ea8cd565..3de32f221 100644
--- a/fs/hfsplus/btree.c
+++ b/fs/hfsplus/btree.c
@@ -403,6 +403,24 @@ struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct super_block *sb, u32 id)
tree->inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &hfsplus_aops;
iput(tree->inode);
free_tree:
+ /*
+ * A B*tree node may already have been inserted into tree->node_hash
+ * (e.g. an errored head node from hfs_bnode_find()). Only
+ * hfs_btree_close() frees hashed nodes, so a bare kfree(tree) here
+ * leaks them. Release them before freeing the tree.
+ */
+ {
+ int i;
+ struct hfs_bnode *node;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NODE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
+ while ((node = tree->node_hash[i])) {
+ tree->node_hash[i] = node->next_hash;
+ hfs_bnode_free(node);
+ tree->node_hash_cnt--;
+ }
+ }
+ }
kfree(tree);
return NULL;
}
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] hfsplus: free cached B-tree nodes on hfs_btree_open() error path
2026-09-30 18:50 [PATCH] hfsplus: free cached B-tree nodes on hfs_btree_open() error path Mahmut Emin Kurhan
@ 2026-09-30 23:04 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-09-30 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] hfsplus, hfs: fix B-tree node leak " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Viacheslav Dubeyko @ 2026-09-30 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mahmut Emin Kurhan, linux-fsdevel; +Cc: glaubitz, frank.li, linux-kernel
On Wed, 2026-09-30 at 20:50 +0200, Mahmut Emin Kurhan wrote:
> hfs_btree_open() can fail after hfs_bnode_find(tree,
> HFSPLUS_TREE_HEAD)
> has already inserted the head node into tree->node_hash.
>
> __hfs_bnode_create() inserts the new bnode into tree->node_hash
> before
> it reads the node's pages; if a page read fails it sets
> HFS_BNODE_ERROR
> and returns the node still hashed. hfs_bnode_find() then takes its
> node_error path, which calls hfs_bnode_put(). hfs_bnode_put() only
> frees
> a node once its refcount reaches zero *and* HFS_BNODE_DELETED is set;
> for
> the errored head node that flag is not set, so the node stays in
> tree->node_hash with a zero refcount.
>
> hfs_btree_open() then sees IS_ERR(node) and jumps to free_tree:,
> which
> does a bare kfree(tree). Only hfs_btree_close() walks tree-
> >node_hash[]
> and frees the cached nodes, so the head node is leaked. Mounting a
> crafted HFS+ image whose head B-tree node fails to read therefore
> leaks
> kernel memory on every attempt.
I assume that HFS code requires the same fix. Am I right?
>
> Reported by kmemleak while fuzzing HFS+ image mounts:
>
> BUG: memory leak
> unreferenced object (size 192):
> __hfs_bnode_create+0x105/0x8d0 fs/hfsplus/bnode.c
> hfsplus_bnode_find fs/hfsplus/bnode.c
> hfsplus_btree_open fs/hfsplus/btree.c
> hfsplus_fill_super fs/hfsplus/super.c
>
> Free any nodes still present in tree->node_hash on the error path
> before
> freeing the tree. The paths that reach free_tree before
> hfs_bnode_find()
> have an empty hash, so the loop is a no-op there.
>
> Found via coverage-guided fuzzing (syzkaller + kmemleak) by Noroxi.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mahmut Emin Kurhan <guvenlik@noroxi.com>
> ---
> fs/hfsplus/btree.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/hfsplus/btree.c b/fs/hfsplus/btree.c
> index 2ea8cd565..3de32f221 100644
> --- a/fs/hfsplus/btree.c
> +++ b/fs/hfsplus/btree.c
> @@ -403,6 +403,24 @@ struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct
> super_block *sb, u32 id)
> tree->inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &hfsplus_aops;
> iput(tree->inode);
> free_tree:
> + /*
> + * A B*tree node may already have been inserted into tree-
> >node_hash
> + * (e.g. an errored head node from hfs_bnode_find()). Only
> + * hfs_btree_close() frees hashed nodes, so a bare
> kfree(tree) here
> + * leaks them. Release them before freeing the tree.
> + */
> + {
I don't like of introducing the brackets here. Let's declare the
variables at the beginning of the method.
> + int i;
> + struct hfs_bnode *node;
We already has this declaration [1].
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < NODE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
> + while ((node = tree->node_hash[i])) {
> + tree->node_hash[i] = node-
> >next_hash;
> + hfs_bnode_free(node);
> + tree->node_hash_cnt--;
> + }
> + }
This logic looks pretty similar to the hfs_btree_close(). Should we
introduce a small method that can be reused in both cases?
I assume that you are not using the spin_lock(&tree->hash_lock) because
the tree creation is not finished and nobody can try to use the tree.
Am I right?
Thanks,
Slava.
[1]
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.3-rc3/source/fs/hfsplus/btree.c#L273
> + }
> kfree(tree);
> return NULL;
> }
> --
> 2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 0/2] hfsplus, hfs: fix B-tree node leak on hfs_btree_open() error path
2026-09-30 23:04 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
@ 2026-09-30 23:23 ` Mahmut Emin Kurhan
2026-09-30 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] hfsplus: free cached B-tree nodes " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
2026-09-30 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] hfs: free cached B-tree nodes " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Mahmut Emin Kurhan @ 2026-09-30 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-fsdevel; +Cc: slava, glaubitz, frank.li, linux-kernel, Mahmut Emin Kurhan
This is v2 of the hfsplus B-tree node leak fix.
Slava, thanks for the review. Addressing your points:
- HFS: you are right. The classic HFS driver has the identical leak:
__hfs_bnode_create() hashes the node before reading its pages,
hfs_bnode_put() only frees a node when HFS_BNODE_DELETED is set, and
hfs_btree_open() does a bare kfree(tree) on its error path. Fixed in
patch 2/2.
- Dropped the inline block and the duplicate variable declarations. The
freeing loop is now a small helper, hfs_bnode_hash_free(), reused by
both hfs_btree_close() and the hfs_btree_open() error path, so nothing
extra is declared at the call site.
- hash_lock: correct -- it is not taken because hfs_btree_open() has not
published the tree yet (it is only returned on success), so no other
thread can reach node_hash. hfs_btree_close() omits it for the same
reason.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20260930185033.1335238-1-guvenlik@noroxi.com
Changes since v1:
- factor the node-hash freeing into hfs_bnode_hash_free() (Slava Dubeyko)
- no inline braces / no duplicate declarations (Slava Dubeyko)
- add the equivalent fix for the classic HFS driver (Slava Dubeyko)
Mahmut Emin Kurhan (2):
hfsplus: free cached B-tree nodes on hfs_btree_open() error path
hfs: free cached B-tree nodes on hfs_btree_open() error path
fs/hfs/btree.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
fs/hfsplus/btree.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/2] hfsplus: free cached B-tree nodes on hfs_btree_open() error path
2026-09-30 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] hfsplus, hfs: fix B-tree node leak " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
@ 2026-09-30 23:23 ` Mahmut Emin Kurhan
2026-10-01 20:03 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-09-30 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] hfs: free cached B-tree nodes " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Mahmut Emin Kurhan @ 2026-09-30 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-fsdevel; +Cc: slava, glaubitz, frank.li, linux-kernel, Mahmut Emin Kurhan
hfs_btree_open() can fail after hfs_bnode_find(tree, HFSPLUS_TREE_HEAD) has
already inserted the head node into tree->node_hash.
__hfs_bnode_create() inserts the new bnode into tree->node_hash before it
reads the node pages; if a page read fails it sets HFS_BNODE_ERROR and
returns the node still hashed. hfs_bnode_find() then takes its node_error
path and calls hfs_bnode_put(), which only frees a node once its refcount
reaches zero *and* HFS_BNODE_DELETED is set. For the errored head node that
flag is not set, so it stays in tree->node_hash with a zero refcount.
hfs_btree_open() then sees IS_ERR(node) and jumps to free_tree:, doing a
bare kfree(tree). Only hfs_btree_close() walks tree->node_hash[] and frees
the cached nodes, so the head node is leaked. Mounting a crafted HFS+ image
whose head B-tree node fails to read leaks kernel memory on every attempt.
Factor the node-hash freeing out of hfs_btree_close() into a small helper
hfs_bnode_hash_free() and call it from both hfs_btree_close() and the
hfs_btree_open() error path. No hash_lock is taken because the tree is not
published yet, so no other thread can reach it.
Found via coverage-guided fuzzing (syzkaller + kmemleak) by Noroxi.
Signed-off-by: Mahmut Emin Kurhan <guvenlik@noroxi.com>
---
fs/hfsplus/btree.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/hfsplus/btree.c b/fs/hfsplus/btree.c
index 2ea8cd565..41e01380d 100644
--- a/fs/hfsplus/btree.c
+++ b/fs/hfsplus/btree.c
@@ -265,6 +265,24 @@ static const char *hfs_btree_name(u32 cnid)
}
/* Get a reference to a B*Tree and do some initial checks */
+static void hfs_bnode_hash_free(struct hfs_btree *tree)
+{
+ struct hfs_bnode *node;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NODE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
+ while ((node = tree->node_hash[i])) {
+ tree->node_hash[i] = node->next_hash;
+ if (atomic_read(&node->refcnt))
+ pr_crit("node %d:%d still has %d user(s)!\n",
+ node->tree->cnid, node->this,
+ atomic_read(&node->refcnt));
+ hfs_bnode_free(node);
+ tree->node_hash_cnt--;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct super_block *sb, u32 id)
{
struct hfs_btree *tree;
@@ -403,6 +421,7 @@ struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct super_block *sb, u32 id)
tree->inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &hfsplus_aops;
iput(tree->inode);
free_tree:
+ hfs_bnode_hash_free(tree);
kfree(tree);
return NULL;
}
@@ -410,24 +429,10 @@ struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct super_block *sb, u32 id)
/* Release resources used by a btree */
void hfs_btree_close(struct hfs_btree *tree)
{
- struct hfs_bnode *node;
- int i;
-
if (!tree)
return;
- for (i = 0; i < NODE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
- while ((node = tree->node_hash[i])) {
- tree->node_hash[i] = node->next_hash;
- if (atomic_read(&node->refcnt))
- pr_crit("node %d:%d "
- "still has %d user(s)!\n",
- node->tree->cnid, node->this,
- atomic_read(&node->refcnt));
- hfs_bnode_free(node);
- tree->node_hash_cnt--;
- }
- }
+ hfs_bnode_hash_free(tree);
iput(tree->inode);
kfree(tree);
}
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/2] hfs: free cached B-tree nodes on hfs_btree_open() error path
2026-09-30 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] hfsplus, hfs: fix B-tree node leak " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
2026-09-30 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] hfsplus: free cached B-tree nodes " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
@ 2026-09-30 23:23 ` Mahmut Emin Kurhan
2026-10-01 20:03 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Mahmut Emin Kurhan @ 2026-09-30 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-fsdevel; +Cc: slava, glaubitz, frank.li, linux-kernel, Mahmut Emin Kurhan
The classic HFS driver has the same B-tree node leak as hfsplus: on the
hfs_btree_open() error path after hfs_bnode_find(tree, HFS_TREE_HEAD), an
errored head node left in tree->node_hash is not freed because free_tree:
does a bare kfree(tree) instead of walking the hash.
Apply the same fix: factor the node-hash freeing into hfs_bnode_hash_free()
and call it from hfs_btree_close() and the hfs_btree_open() error path.
Found via coverage-guided fuzzing (syzkaller + kmemleak) by Noroxi.
Signed-off-by: Mahmut Emin Kurhan <guvenlik@noroxi.com>
---
fs/hfs/btree.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/hfs/btree.c b/fs/hfs/btree.c
index 41b4e8fc9..51d1e19a4 100644
--- a/fs/hfs/btree.c
+++ b/fs/hfs/btree.c
@@ -131,6 +131,24 @@ static int hfs_bmap_clear_bit(struct hfs_bnode *node, u32 node_bit_idx)
}
/* Get a reference to a B*Tree and do some initial checks */
+static void hfs_bnode_hash_free(struct hfs_btree *tree)
+{
+ struct hfs_bnode *node;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NODE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
+ while ((node = tree->node_hash[i])) {
+ tree->node_hash[i] = node->next_hash;
+ if (atomic_read(&node->refcnt))
+ pr_err("node %d:%d still has %d user(s)!\n",
+ node->tree->cnid, node->this,
+ atomic_read(&node->refcnt));
+ hfs_bnode_free(node);
+ tree->node_hash_cnt--;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct super_block *sb, u32 id, btree_keycmp keycmp)
{
struct hfs_btree *tree;
@@ -296,6 +314,7 @@ struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct super_block *sb, u32 id, btree_keycmp ke
tree->inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &hfs_aops;
iput(tree->inode);
free_tree:
+ hfs_bnode_hash_free(tree);
kfree(tree);
return NULL;
}
@@ -303,23 +322,10 @@ struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct super_block *sb, u32 id, btree_keycmp ke
/* Release resources used by a btree */
void hfs_btree_close(struct hfs_btree *tree)
{
- struct hfs_bnode *node;
- int i;
-
if (!tree)
return;
- for (i = 0; i < NODE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
- while ((node = tree->node_hash[i])) {
- tree->node_hash[i] = node->next_hash;
- if (atomic_read(&node->refcnt))
- pr_err("node %d:%d still has %d user(s)!\n",
- node->tree->cnid, node->this,
- atomic_read(&node->refcnt));
- hfs_bnode_free(node);
- tree->node_hash_cnt--;
- }
- }
+ hfs_bnode_hash_free(tree);
iput(tree->inode);
kfree(tree);
}
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] hfsplus: free cached B-tree nodes on hfs_btree_open() error path
2026-09-30 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] hfsplus: free cached B-tree nodes " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
@ 2026-10-01 20:03 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-10-01 21:38 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] hfsplus, hfs: fix B-tree node leak " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Viacheslav Dubeyko @ 2026-10-01 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mahmut Emin Kurhan, linux-fsdevel; +Cc: glaubitz, frank.li, linux-kernel
On Thu, 2026-10-01 at 01:23 +0200, Mahmut Emin Kurhan wrote:
> hfs_btree_open() can fail after hfs_bnode_find(tree,
> HFSPLUS_TREE_HEAD) has
> already inserted the head node into tree->node_hash.
>
> __hfs_bnode_create() inserts the new bnode into tree->node_hash
> before it
> reads the node pages; if a page read fails it sets HFS_BNODE_ERROR
> and
> returns the node still hashed. hfs_bnode_find() then takes its
> node_error
> path and calls hfs_bnode_put(), which only frees a node once its
> refcount
> reaches zero *and* HFS_BNODE_DELETED is set. For the errored head
> node that
> flag is not set, so it stays in tree->node_hash with a zero refcount.
>
> hfs_btree_open() then sees IS_ERR(node) and jumps to free_tree:,
> doing a
> bare kfree(tree). Only hfs_btree_close() walks tree->node_hash[] and
> frees
> the cached nodes, so the head node is leaked. Mounting a crafted HFS+
> image
> whose head B-tree node fails to read leaks kernel memory on every
> attempt.
>
> Factor the node-hash freeing out of hfs_btree_close() into a small
> helper
> hfs_bnode_hash_free() and call it from both hfs_btree_close() and the
> hfs_btree_open() error path. No hash_lock is taken because the tree
> is not
> published yet, so no other thread can reach it.
>
> Found via coverage-guided fuzzing (syzkaller + kmemleak) by Noroxi.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mahmut Emin Kurhan <guvenlik@noroxi.com>
> ---
> fs/hfsplus/btree.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/hfsplus/btree.c b/fs/hfsplus/btree.c
> index 2ea8cd565..41e01380d 100644
> --- a/fs/hfsplus/btree.c
> +++ b/fs/hfsplus/btree.c
> @@ -265,6 +265,24 @@ static const char *hfs_btree_name(u32 cnid)
> }
>
> /* Get a reference to a B*Tree and do some initial checks */
> +static void hfs_bnode_hash_free(struct hfs_btree *tree)
> +{
> + struct hfs_bnode *node;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < NODE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
> + while ((node = tree->node_hash[i])) {
> + tree->node_hash[i] = node->next_hash;
> + if (atomic_read(&node->refcnt))
> + pr_crit("node %d:%d still has %d
> user(s)!\n",
> + node->tree->cnid, node-
> >this,
> + atomic_read(&node->refcnt));
> + hfs_bnode_free(node);
> + tree->node_hash_cnt--;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct super_block *sb, u32 id)
> {
> struct hfs_btree *tree;
> @@ -403,6 +421,7 @@ struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct
> super_block *sb, u32 id)
> tree->inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &hfsplus_aops;
> iput(tree->inode);
> free_tree:
> + hfs_bnode_hash_free(tree);
> kfree(tree);
> return NULL;
> }
> @@ -410,24 +429,10 @@ struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct
> super_block *sb, u32 id)
> /* Release resources used by a btree */
> void hfs_btree_close(struct hfs_btree *tree)
> {
> - struct hfs_bnode *node;
> - int i;
> -
> if (!tree)
> return;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < NODE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
> - while ((node = tree->node_hash[i])) {
> - tree->node_hash[i] = node->next_hash;
> - if (atomic_read(&node->refcnt))
> - pr_crit("node %d:%d "
> - "still has %d
> user(s)!\n",
> - node->tree->cnid, node-
> >this,
> - atomic_read(&node->refcnt));
> - hfs_bnode_free(node);
> - tree->node_hash_cnt--;
> - }
> - }
> + hfs_bnode_hash_free(tree);
> iput(tree->inode);
> kfree(tree);
> }
Now your patch conflicts with [1]. Please, base your patch on for-next
branch of HFS/HFS+ git tree [2].
Thanks,
Slava.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260921153729.600313-1-bruno.produit@trailofbits.com
[2]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vdubeyko/hfs.git/log/?h=for-next
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] hfs: free cached B-tree nodes on hfs_btree_open() error path
2026-09-30 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] hfs: free cached B-tree nodes " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
@ 2026-10-01 20:03 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Viacheslav Dubeyko @ 2026-10-01 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mahmut Emin Kurhan, linux-fsdevel; +Cc: glaubitz, frank.li, linux-kernel
On Thu, 2026-10-01 at 01:23 +0200, Mahmut Emin Kurhan wrote:
> The classic HFS driver has the same B-tree node leak as hfsplus: on
> the
> hfs_btree_open() error path after hfs_bnode_find(tree,
> HFS_TREE_HEAD), an
> errored head node left in tree->node_hash is not freed because
> free_tree:
> does a bare kfree(tree) instead of walking the hash.
>
> Apply the same fix: factor the node-hash freeing into
> hfs_bnode_hash_free()
> and call it from hfs_btree_close() and the hfs_btree_open() error
> path.
>
> Found via coverage-guided fuzzing (syzkaller + kmemleak) by Noroxi.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mahmut Emin Kurhan <guvenlik@noroxi.com>
> ---
> fs/hfs/btree.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/hfs/btree.c b/fs/hfs/btree.c
> index 41b4e8fc9..51d1e19a4 100644
> --- a/fs/hfs/btree.c
> +++ b/fs/hfs/btree.c
> @@ -131,6 +131,24 @@ static int hfs_bmap_clear_bit(struct hfs_bnode
> *node, u32 node_bit_idx)
> }
>
> /* Get a reference to a B*Tree and do some initial checks */
> +static void hfs_bnode_hash_free(struct hfs_btree *tree)
> +{
> + struct hfs_bnode *node;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < NODE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
> + while ((node = tree->node_hash[i])) {
> + tree->node_hash[i] = node->next_hash;
> + if (atomic_read(&node->refcnt))
> + pr_err("node %d:%d still has %d
> user(s)!\n",
> + node->tree->cnid, node->this,
> + atomic_read(&node->refcnt));
> + hfs_bnode_free(node);
> + tree->node_hash_cnt--;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct super_block *sb, u32 id,
> btree_keycmp keycmp)
> {
> struct hfs_btree *tree;
> @@ -296,6 +314,7 @@ struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct
> super_block *sb, u32 id, btree_keycmp ke
> tree->inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &hfs_aops;
> iput(tree->inode);
> free_tree:
> + hfs_bnode_hash_free(tree);
> kfree(tree);
> return NULL;
> }
> @@ -303,23 +322,10 @@ struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct
> super_block *sb, u32 id, btree_keycmp ke
> /* Release resources used by a btree */
> void hfs_btree_close(struct hfs_btree *tree)
> {
> - struct hfs_bnode *node;
> - int i;
> -
> if (!tree)
> return;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < NODE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
> - while ((node = tree->node_hash[i])) {
> - tree->node_hash[i] = node->next_hash;
> - if (atomic_read(&node->refcnt))
> - pr_err("node %d:%d still has %d
> user(s)!\n",
> - node->tree->cnid, node->this,
> - atomic_read(&node->refcnt));
> - hfs_bnode_free(node);
> - tree->node_hash_cnt--;
> - }
> - }
> + hfs_bnode_hash_free(tree);
> iput(tree->inode);
> kfree(tree);
> }
Ditto. Now your patch conflicts with [1]. Please, base your patch on
for-next branch of HFS/HFS+ git tree [2].
Thanks,
Slava.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260921153729.600313-1-bruno.produit@trailofbits.com
[2]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vdubeyko/hfs.git/log/?h=for-next
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 0/2] hfsplus, hfs: fix B-tree node leak on hfs_btree_open() error path
2026-10-01 20:03 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
@ 2026-10-01 21:38 ` Mahmut Emin Kurhan
2026-10-01 21:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] hfsplus: free cached B-tree nodes " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Mahmut Emin Kurhan @ 2026-10-01 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-fsdevel; +Cc: slava, glaubitz, frank.li, linux-kernel, Mahmut Emin Kurhan
This is v3 of the hfsplus/hfs B-tree node leak fix, rebased onto the
for-next branch of the HFS/HFS+ tree as requested.
The leak is unchanged: hfs_btree_open() can fail after the head node has
been inserted into tree->node_hash, and the error path does a bare
kfree(tree) without freeing the hashed nodes. The fix factors the
node-hash freeing out of hfs_btree_close() into hfs_bnode_hash_free() and
calls it from both hfs_btree_close() and the hfs_btree_open() error path.
Changes since v2:
- rebased on for-next; the extracted helper now wraps the hash_lock
serialized close loop introduced by commit dce0e0248205 ("hfs/hfsplus:
serialize B-tree close against folio release") (Slava Dubeyko)
- on the open error path the tree is not published yet, so the lock is
uncontended but kept for consistency
- no functional change to the leak fix itself
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20260930232312.1405042-1-guvenlik@noroxi.com
Mahmut Emin Kurhan (2):
hfsplus: free cached B-tree nodes on hfs_btree_open() error path
hfs: free cached B-tree nodes on hfs_btree_open() error path
fs/hfs/btree.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
fs/hfsplus/btree.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/2] hfsplus: free cached B-tree nodes on hfs_btree_open() error path
2026-10-01 21:38 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] hfsplus, hfs: fix B-tree node leak " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
@ 2026-10-01 21:38 ` Mahmut Emin Kurhan
2026-10-05 19:16 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-10-01 21:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] hfs: " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
2026-10-02 18:18 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] hfsplus, hfs: fix B-tree node leak " Viacheslav Dubeyko
2 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Mahmut Emin Kurhan @ 2026-10-01 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-fsdevel; +Cc: slava, glaubitz, frank.li, linux-kernel, Mahmut Emin Kurhan
hfs_btree_open() can fail after hfs_bnode_find(tree, HFSPLUS_TREE_HEAD) has
already inserted the head node into tree->node_hash.
__hfs_bnode_create() inserts the new bnode into tree->node_hash before it
reads the node pages; if a page read fails it sets HFS_BNODE_ERROR and
returns the node still hashed. hfs_bnode_find() then takes its node_error
path and calls hfs_bnode_put(), which only frees a node once its refcount
reaches zero *and* HFS_BNODE_DELETED is set. For the errored head node that
flag is not set, so it stays in tree->node_hash with a zero refcount.
hfs_btree_open() then sees IS_ERR(node) and jumps to free_tree:, doing a
bare kfree(tree). Only hfs_btree_close() walks tree->node_hash[] and frees
the cached nodes, so the head node is leaked. Mounting a crafted HFS+ image
whose head B-tree node fails to read leaks kernel memory on every attempt.
Factor the node-hash freeing out of hfs_btree_close() into a small helper
hfs_bnode_hash_free() and call it from both hfs_btree_close() and the
hfs_btree_open() error path. The helper keeps the hash_lock serialization
added in commit dce0e0248205 ("hfs/hfsplus: serialize B-tree close against
folio release"); on the open error path the tree has not been published yet,
so the lock is uncontended but harmless.
Found via coverage-guided fuzzing (syzkaller + kmemleak) by Noroxi.
Signed-off-by: Mahmut Emin Kurhan <guvenlik@noroxi.com>
---
fs/hfsplus/btree.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/hfsplus/btree.c b/fs/hfsplus/btree.c
index bd4dbdbc8f..2183828d5d 100644
--- a/fs/hfsplus/btree.c
+++ b/fs/hfsplus/btree.c
@@ -265,6 +265,27 @@ static const char *hfs_btree_name(u32 cnid)
}
/* Get a reference to a B*Tree and do some initial checks */
+static void hfs_bnode_hash_free(struct hfs_btree *tree)
+{
+ struct hfs_bnode *node;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NODE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
+ spin_lock(&tree->hash_lock);
+ while ((node = tree->node_hash[i])) {
+ hfs_bnode_unhash(node);
+ spin_unlock(&tree->hash_lock);
+ if (atomic_read(&node->refcnt))
+ pr_crit("node %d:%d still has %d user(s)!\n",
+ node->tree->cnid, node->this,
+ atomic_read(&node->refcnt));
+ hfs_bnode_free(node);
+ spin_lock(&tree->hash_lock);
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&tree->hash_lock);
+ }
+}
+
struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct super_block *sb, u32 id)
{
struct hfs_btree *tree;
@@ -403,6 +424,7 @@ struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct super_block *sb, u32 id)
tree->inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &hfsplus_aops;
iput(tree->inode);
free_tree:
+ hfs_bnode_hash_free(tree);
kfree(tree);
return NULL;
}
@@ -410,27 +432,10 @@ struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct super_block *sb, u32 id)
/* Release resources used by a btree */
void hfs_btree_close(struct hfs_btree *tree)
{
- struct hfs_bnode *node;
- int i;
-
if (!tree)
return;
- for (i = 0; i < NODE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
- spin_lock(&tree->hash_lock);
- while ((node = tree->node_hash[i])) {
- hfs_bnode_unhash(node);
- spin_unlock(&tree->hash_lock);
- if (atomic_read(&node->refcnt))
- pr_crit("node %d:%d "
- "still has %d user(s)!\n",
- node->tree->cnid, node->this,
- atomic_read(&node->refcnt));
- hfs_bnode_free(node);
- spin_lock(&tree->hash_lock);
- }
- spin_unlock(&tree->hash_lock);
- }
+ hfs_bnode_hash_free(tree);
iput(tree->inode);
kfree(tree);
}
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 2/2] hfs: free cached B-tree nodes on hfs_btree_open() error path
2026-10-01 21:38 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] hfsplus, hfs: fix B-tree node leak " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
2026-10-01 21:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] hfsplus: free cached B-tree nodes " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
@ 2026-10-01 21:38 ` Mahmut Emin Kurhan
2026-10-05 19:20 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-10-02 18:18 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] hfsplus, hfs: fix B-tree node leak " Viacheslav Dubeyko
2 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Mahmut Emin Kurhan @ 2026-10-01 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-fsdevel; +Cc: slava, glaubitz, frank.li, linux-kernel, Mahmut Emin Kurhan
The classic HFS driver has the same B-tree node leak as hfsplus: on the
hfs_btree_open() error path after hfs_bnode_find(tree, HFS_TREE_HEAD), an
errored head node left in tree->node_hash is not freed because free_tree:
does a bare kfree(tree) instead of walking the hash.
Apply the same fix: factor the node-hash freeing into hfs_bnode_hash_free()
and call it from hfs_btree_close() and the hfs_btree_open() error path. The
helper keeps the hash_lock serialization from commit dce0e0248205 ("hfs/hfsplus:
serialize B-tree close against folio release").
Found via coverage-guided fuzzing (syzkaller + kmemleak) by Noroxi.
Signed-off-by: Mahmut Emin Kurhan <guvenlik@noroxi.com>
---
fs/hfs/btree.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/hfs/btree.c b/fs/hfs/btree.c
index 4f0ddc76e8..140cdb5ec6 100644
--- a/fs/hfs/btree.c
+++ b/fs/hfs/btree.c
@@ -131,6 +131,27 @@ static int hfs_bmap_clear_bit(struct hfs_bnode *node, u32 node_bit_idx)
}
/* Get a reference to a B*Tree and do some initial checks */
+static void hfs_bnode_hash_free(struct hfs_btree *tree)
+{
+ struct hfs_bnode *node;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NODE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
+ spin_lock(&tree->hash_lock);
+ while ((node = tree->node_hash[i])) {
+ hfs_bnode_unhash(node);
+ spin_unlock(&tree->hash_lock);
+ if (atomic_read(&node->refcnt))
+ pr_err("node %d:%d still has %d user(s)!\n",
+ node->tree->cnid, node->this,
+ atomic_read(&node->refcnt));
+ hfs_bnode_free(node);
+ spin_lock(&tree->hash_lock);
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&tree->hash_lock);
+ }
+}
+
struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct super_block *sb, u32 id, btree_keycmp keycmp)
{
struct hfs_btree *tree;
@@ -296,6 +317,7 @@ struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct super_block *sb, u32 id, btree_keycmp ke
tree->inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &hfs_aops;
iput(tree->inode);
free_tree:
+ hfs_bnode_hash_free(tree);
kfree(tree);
return NULL;
}
@@ -303,26 +325,10 @@ struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct super_block *sb, u32 id, btree_keycmp ke
/* Release resources used by a btree */
void hfs_btree_close(struct hfs_btree *tree)
{
- struct hfs_bnode *node;
- int i;
-
if (!tree)
return;
- for (i = 0; i < NODE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
- spin_lock(&tree->hash_lock);
- while ((node = tree->node_hash[i])) {
- hfs_bnode_unhash(node);
- spin_unlock(&tree->hash_lock);
- if (atomic_read(&node->refcnt))
- pr_err("node %d:%d still has %d user(s)!\n",
- node->tree->cnid, node->this,
- atomic_read(&node->refcnt));
- hfs_bnode_free(node);
- spin_lock(&tree->hash_lock);
- }
- spin_unlock(&tree->hash_lock);
- }
+ hfs_bnode_hash_free(tree);
iput(tree->inode);
kfree(tree);
}
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] hfsplus, hfs: fix B-tree node leak on hfs_btree_open() error path
2026-10-01 21:38 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] hfsplus, hfs: fix B-tree node leak " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
2026-10-01 21:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] hfsplus: free cached B-tree nodes " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
2026-10-01 21:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] hfs: " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
@ 2026-10-02 18:18 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-10-05 18:51 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Viacheslav Dubeyko @ 2026-10-02 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mahmut Emin Kurhan, linux-fsdevel; +Cc: glaubitz, frank.li, linux-kernel
On Thu, 2026-10-01 at 23:38 +0200, Mahmut Emin Kurhan wrote:
> This is v3 of the hfsplus/hfs B-tree node leak fix, rebased onto the
> for-next branch of the HFS/HFS+ tree as requested.
>
> The leak is unchanged: hfs_btree_open() can fail after the head node
> has
> been inserted into tree->node_hash, and the error path does a bare
> kfree(tree) without freeing the hashed nodes. The fix factors the
> node-hash freeing out of hfs_btree_close() into hfs_bnode_hash_free()
> and
> calls it from both hfs_btree_close() and the hfs_btree_open() error
> path.
>
> Changes since v2:
> - rebased on for-next; the extracted helper now wraps the hash_lock
> serialized close loop introduced by commit dce0e0248205
> ("hfs/hfsplus:
> serialize B-tree close against folio release") (Slava Dubeyko)
> - on the open error path the tree is not published yet, so the lock
> is
> uncontended but kept for consistency
> - no functional change to the leak fix itself
>
> v2:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20260930232312.1405042-1-guvenlik@noroxi.com
>
> Mahmut Emin Kurhan (2):
> hfsplus: free cached B-tree nodes on hfs_btree_open() error path
> hfs: free cached B-tree nodes on hfs_btree_open() error path
>
> fs/hfs/btree.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> fs/hfsplus/btree.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
The patchset looks reasonable to me. Let me run xfstests for the
patchset. I'll share the results ASAP.
Thanks,
Slava.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] hfsplus, hfs: fix B-tree node leak on hfs_btree_open() error path
2026-10-02 18:18 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] hfsplus, hfs: fix B-tree node leak " Viacheslav Dubeyko
@ 2026-10-05 18:51 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Viacheslav Dubeyko @ 2026-10-05 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mahmut Emin Kurhan, linux-fsdevel; +Cc: glaubitz, frank.li, linux-kernel
On Fri, 2026-10-02 at 11:18 -0700, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> On Thu, 2026-10-01 at 23:38 +0200, Mahmut Emin Kurhan wrote:
> > This is v3 of the hfsplus/hfs B-tree node leak fix, rebased onto
> > the
> > for-next branch of the HFS/HFS+ tree as requested.
> >
> > The leak is unchanged: hfs_btree_open() can fail after the head
> > node
> > has
> > been inserted into tree->node_hash, and the error path does a bare
> > kfree(tree) without freeing the hashed nodes. The fix factors the
> > node-hash freeing out of hfs_btree_close() into
> > hfs_bnode_hash_free()
> > and
> > calls it from both hfs_btree_close() and the hfs_btree_open() error
> > path.
> >
> > Changes since v2:
> > - rebased on for-next; the extracted helper now wraps the
> > hash_lock
> > serialized close loop introduced by commit dce0e0248205
> > ("hfs/hfsplus:
> > serialize B-tree close against folio release") (Slava Dubeyko)
> > - on the open error path the tree is not published yet, so the
> > lock
> > is
> > uncontended but kept for consistency
> > - no functional change to the leak fix itself
> >
> > v2:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20260930232312.1405042-1-guvenlik@noroxi.com
> >
> > Mahmut Emin Kurhan (2):
> > hfsplus: free cached B-tree nodes on hfs_btree_open() error path
> > hfs: free cached B-tree nodes on hfs_btree_open() error path
> >
> > fs/hfs/btree.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > fs/hfsplus/btree.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> > 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> The patchset looks reasonable to me. Let me run xfstests for the
> patchset. I'll share the results ASAP.
>
The xfstests HFS+ run hadn't reveal degradation or new issues.
Thanks,
Slava.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] hfsplus: free cached B-tree nodes on hfs_btree_open() error path
2026-10-01 21:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] hfsplus: free cached B-tree nodes " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
@ 2026-10-05 19:16 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Viacheslav Dubeyko @ 2026-10-05 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mahmut Emin Kurhan, linux-fsdevel; +Cc: glaubitz, frank.li, linux-kernel
On Thu, 2026-10-01 at 23:38 +0200, Mahmut Emin Kurhan wrote:
> hfs_btree_open() can fail after hfs_bnode_find(tree,
> HFSPLUS_TREE_HEAD) has
> already inserted the head node into tree->node_hash.
>
> __hfs_bnode_create() inserts the new bnode into tree->node_hash
> before it
> reads the node pages; if a page read fails it sets HFS_BNODE_ERROR
> and
> returns the node still hashed. hfs_bnode_find() then takes its
> node_error
> path and calls hfs_bnode_put(), which only frees a node once its
> refcount
> reaches zero *and* HFS_BNODE_DELETED is set. For the errored head
> node that
> flag is not set, so it stays in tree->node_hash with a zero refcount.
>
> hfs_btree_open() then sees IS_ERR(node) and jumps to free_tree:,
> doing a
> bare kfree(tree). Only hfs_btree_close() walks tree->node_hash[] and
> frees
> the cached nodes, so the head node is leaked. Mounting a crafted HFS+
> image
> whose head B-tree node fails to read leaks kernel memory on every
> attempt.
>
> Factor the node-hash freeing out of hfs_btree_close() into a small
> helper
> hfs_bnode_hash_free() and call it from both hfs_btree_close() and the
> hfs_btree_open() error path. The helper keeps the hash_lock
> serialization
> added in commit dce0e0248205 ("hfs/hfsplus: serialize B-tree close
I think it is not good idea of mentioning this. This patch is not
upstream yet.
> against
> folio release"); on the open error path the tree has not been
> published yet,
> so the lock is uncontended but harmless.
>
> Found via coverage-guided fuzzing (syzkaller + kmemleak) by Noroxi.
Should we use Reported-by: tag?
>
> Signed-off-by: Mahmut Emin Kurhan <guvenlik@noroxi.com>
> ---
> fs/hfsplus/btree.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/hfsplus/btree.c b/fs/hfsplus/btree.c
> index bd4dbdbc8f..2183828d5d 100644
> --- a/fs/hfsplus/btree.c
> +++ b/fs/hfsplus/btree.c
> @@ -265,6 +265,27 @@ static const char *hfs_btree_name(u32 cnid)
> }
>
> /* Get a reference to a B*Tree and do some initial checks */
Are you sure that it is correct place for the comment?
> +static void hfs_bnode_hash_free(struct hfs_btree *tree)
Maybe, hfs_btree_free_nodes() because function lives in btree.c?
> +{
> + struct hfs_bnode *node;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < NODE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
> + spin_lock(&tree->hash_lock);
> + while ((node = tree->node_hash[i])) {
> + hfs_bnode_unhash(node);
> + spin_unlock(&tree->hash_lock);
> + if (atomic_read(&node->refcnt))
> + pr_crit("node %d:%d still has %d
> user(s)!\n",
> + node->tree->cnid, node-
> >this,
> + atomic_read(&node->refcnt));
> + hfs_bnode_free(node);
> + spin_lock(&tree->hash_lock);
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&tree->hash_lock);
> + }
> +}
> +
> struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct super_block *sb, u32 id)
> {
> struct hfs_btree *tree;
> @@ -403,6 +424,7 @@ struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct
> super_block *sb, u32 id)
> tree->inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &hfsplus_aops;
> iput(tree->inode);
> free_tree:
> + hfs_bnode_hash_free(tree);
We have inconsistency here. The hfs_btree_close() calls
hfs_bnode_hash_free() and iput() then. Here we have opposite sequence.
Thanks,
Slava.
> kfree(tree);
> return NULL;
> }
> @@ -410,27 +432,10 @@ struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct
> super_block *sb, u32 id)
> /* Release resources used by a btree */
> void hfs_btree_close(struct hfs_btree *tree)
> {
> - struct hfs_bnode *node;
> - int i;
> -
> if (!tree)
> return;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < NODE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
> - spin_lock(&tree->hash_lock);
> - while ((node = tree->node_hash[i])) {
> - hfs_bnode_unhash(node);
> - spin_unlock(&tree->hash_lock);
> - if (atomic_read(&node->refcnt))
> - pr_crit("node %d:%d "
> - "still has %d
> user(s)!\n",
> - node->tree->cnid, node-
> >this,
> - atomic_read(&node->refcnt));
> - hfs_bnode_free(node);
> - spin_lock(&tree->hash_lock);
> - }
> - spin_unlock(&tree->hash_lock);
> - }
> + hfs_bnode_hash_free(tree);
> iput(tree->inode);
> kfree(tree);
> }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] hfs: free cached B-tree nodes on hfs_btree_open() error path
2026-10-01 21:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] hfs: " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
@ 2026-10-05 19:20 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Viacheslav Dubeyko @ 2026-10-05 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mahmut Emin Kurhan, linux-fsdevel; +Cc: glaubitz, frank.li, linux-kernel
On Thu, 2026-10-01 at 23:38 +0200, Mahmut Emin Kurhan wrote:
> The classic HFS driver has the same B-tree node leak as hfsplus: on
> the
> hfs_btree_open() error path after hfs_bnode_find(tree,
> HFS_TREE_HEAD), an
> errored head node left in tree->node_hash is not freed because
> free_tree:
> does a bare kfree(tree) instead of walking the hash.
>
> Apply the same fix: factor the node-hash freeing into
> hfs_bnode_hash_free()
> and call it from hfs_btree_close() and the hfs_btree_open() error
> path. The
> helper keeps the hash_lock serialization from commit dce0e0248205
> ("hfs/hfsplus:
> serialize B-tree close against folio release").
>
> Found via coverage-guided fuzzing (syzkaller + kmemleak) by Noroxi.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mahmut Emin Kurhan <guvenlik@noroxi.com>
Please, see my comments for HFS+ patch. This patch has the same issues.
Thanks,
Slava.
> ---
> fs/hfs/btree.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/hfs/btree.c b/fs/hfs/btree.c
> index 4f0ddc76e8..140cdb5ec6 100644
> --- a/fs/hfs/btree.c
> +++ b/fs/hfs/btree.c
> @@ -131,6 +131,27 @@ static int hfs_bmap_clear_bit(struct hfs_bnode
> *node, u32 node_bit_idx)
> }
>
> /* Get a reference to a B*Tree and do some initial checks */
> +static void hfs_bnode_hash_free(struct hfs_btree *tree)
> +{
> + struct hfs_bnode *node;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < NODE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
> + spin_lock(&tree->hash_lock);
> + while ((node = tree->node_hash[i])) {
> + hfs_bnode_unhash(node);
> + spin_unlock(&tree->hash_lock);
> + if (atomic_read(&node->refcnt))
> + pr_err("node %d:%d still has %d
> user(s)!\n",
> + node->tree->cnid, node->this,
> + atomic_read(&node->refcnt));
> + hfs_bnode_free(node);
> + spin_lock(&tree->hash_lock);
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&tree->hash_lock);
> + }
> +}
> +
> struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct super_block *sb, u32 id,
> btree_keycmp keycmp)
> {
> struct hfs_btree *tree;
> @@ -296,6 +317,7 @@ struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct
> super_block *sb, u32 id, btree_keycmp ke
> tree->inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &hfs_aops;
> iput(tree->inode);
> free_tree:
> + hfs_bnode_hash_free(tree);
> kfree(tree);
> return NULL;
> }
> @@ -303,26 +325,10 @@ struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct
> super_block *sb, u32 id, btree_keycmp ke
> /* Release resources used by a btree */
> void hfs_btree_close(struct hfs_btree *tree)
> {
> - struct hfs_bnode *node;
> - int i;
> -
> if (!tree)
> return;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < NODE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
> - spin_lock(&tree->hash_lock);
> - while ((node = tree->node_hash[i])) {
> - hfs_bnode_unhash(node);
> - spin_unlock(&tree->hash_lock);
> - if (atomic_read(&node->refcnt))
> - pr_err("node %d:%d still has %d
> user(s)!\n",
> - node->tree->cnid, node->this,
> - atomic_read(&node->refcnt));
> - hfs_bnode_free(node);
> - spin_lock(&tree->hash_lock);
> - }
> - spin_unlock(&tree->hash_lock);
> - }
> + hfs_bnode_hash_free(tree);
> iput(tree->inode);
> kfree(tree);
> }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-05 19:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-30 18:50 [PATCH] hfsplus: free cached B-tree nodes on hfs_btree_open() error path Mahmut Emin Kurhan
2026-09-30 23:04 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-09-30 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] hfsplus, hfs: fix B-tree node leak " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
2026-09-30 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] hfsplus: free cached B-tree nodes " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
2026-10-01 20:03 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-10-01 21:38 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] hfsplus, hfs: fix B-tree node leak " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
2026-10-01 21:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] hfsplus: free cached B-tree nodes " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
2026-10-05 19:16 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-10-01 21:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] hfs: " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
2026-10-05 19:20 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-10-02 18:18 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] hfsplus, hfs: fix B-tree node leak " Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-10-05 18:51 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-09-30 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] hfs: free cached B-tree nodes " Mahmut Emin Kurhan
2026-10-01 20:03 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®